It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Just who do Rep Cicilline and Rep. Nadler represent because it should not be Peter Strzok

page: 1
23
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 07:39 PM
link   
It should be the American people...



So here we have more testimony and questions with Mr Strzok. The session with Gowdy I am sure is getting all the coverage but as more of the day comes out it seems like the FBI agent had a group of lawyers...in the US House of Representatives...to assist him. If you watched the video and are following either of the other two threads you have seen the Gowdy showdown.

Link 1

Link 2

So we have him interrupting Gohmert just like Gowdy was



The last minute is best....this is right before Gowdy...we see him being protected and not questioned. The people on these committies should be demanding answers united and NOT protecting and representing people who are testifying.

Does NO one else see anything wrong with this? We have sitting elected officials who are basically obstructing other members from asking questions. Trying to find answers and allowing this guy to hide behind his FBI protection.

This is a sad moment in the country watching this.




posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 07:43 PM
link   
Democrats are obviously very afraid of something.

Something very big and Earth shaking.

Zi Democrati panik was on full display today 😃




posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 07:50 PM
link   
I didnt get a chance to watch it live since I was at work all damn day. but was able to listen to some highlights (and lowlights), and holy hell the Dems pissed me off. also, who was the clown who said that he should receive a freaking Purple Heart??? Are you kidding me????



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

For one. The camera angle on Strozk made him look inhuman and up to something. But from his facial expression while Gohmert was speaking was like he was antsy to just jump at his throat and prove him wrong.

Second, Gohmert was just attacking him, almost yelling and saying bunch of random 'facts' about he said she said. There was no real evidence given, no "look I have this report / citation here", just out right scolding.

Edit: I forgot my third point.
The second video also shows just how even tho he says no, they don't take it for an answer. What more do they want? They fabricate a story off some truth and demonize his involvement.

I watched a bit of this and it was an interrogation if anything else. It was pointless and literally led to nothing more than more unnecessary democrat hate.

This whole situation in the states is more than just a joke now days, it's scary. You have both sides yelling at each other for stuff that EVERY politician and EVERY political party has been guilty of in the past, but this time the republicans are taking the democrats to the chopping block because they have power and popularity right now. This is a political genocide. And people are gobbling it up.
edit on 12-7-2018 by strongfp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 08:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Democrats are obviously very afraid of something.

Something very big and Earth shaking.

Zi Democrati panik was on full display today 😃



You bet your ass they are afraid.
But the most hilarious part of this entire dumpster fire of the Leftist’s is......
They are complete and unequivocal failures....they lied, they cheated, they tried to tilt the entire election in Hillary’s favor and they STILL LOST!!!
Of course they are going to try to defend each other, because they are all neck deep in sh!t together.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

OK. Prove it.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 08:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: RazorV66

OK. Prove it.


Geez....why do I need to prove anything?
Do some research on why this clown Strzok is there with his so called “testimony”
He was a supposed lead “investigator” into Hillary’s email disaster and the entire time he supposed to be investigating Hillary, there are thousands of documented texts by him showing his complete bias against Trump.
His “back-up” plan failed......Trump won.
And while he is getting grilled, the other deranged Democrats on the committee are trying to save him with deflections.


edit on 12-7-2018 by RazorV66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 08:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: RazorV66

OK. Prove it.
BS fallace.

Prove Russian collusion first, see how far that gets you.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

You made the claims.

I called you out.

So ball is in your court, and so far. You're just making stuff up.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: RazorV66

You made the claims.

I called you out.

So ball is in your court, and so far. You're just making stuff up.
Actions of the leftist Dems speak for itself, that's not making stuff up.

If you can't accept that, too bad?



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Deflection to a point I made that has 100% accuracy. PROVE IT. Because all I see is zero evidence and a bunch of people yelling and pointing fingers.
Emails this, collusion that, Trump this, Hillary that. Yet nothing has come of it.

I am going to throw my tin foil hat on here *boink*

Maybe you're all falling into a literal collusion of Dems and repubs trap with collusion with each other.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

What actions?

What dems? the Democrats or the Democrat - socialist party?

You do know there's two different ones right.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Arnie123

What actions?

What dems? the Democrats or the Democrat - socialist party?

You do know there's two different ones right.
TF you talking about socialist for...ah I see, you're being too literal, foolish.

I'm talking about todays coverage, stay on topic cupcake and keep up, jesus.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Arnie123

Deflection to a point I made that has 100% accuracy. PROVE IT. Because all I see is zero evidence and a bunch of people yelling and pointing fingers.
Emails this, collusion that, Trump this, Hillary that. Yet nothing has come of it.

I am going to throw my tin foil hat on here *boink*

Maybe you're all falling into a literal collusion of Dems and repubs trap with collusion with each other.
Right, another self enlightened, lmfao, fool who thinks they've figured the partisan paradigm, be quiet dude.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

There's two different democrat parties and people mix them up ALL the time.
For one the Democrats were a right leaning party, NOT LEFT, Bernies Democrats were left leaning but you know, since the narrative and ignorance is real in the states, I am not surprised people don't know the political map even if it was thrown in their face.
Just think for a second. You honestly think a major party like the Democrats would run a socialist or liberal platform? NOPE it's political suicide in the US.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

You're the one who jumped at my throat for asking for proof and pushed your anti - dem status on me. I'm just saying how it is. Don't go looking for passive comments from me when you throw the first punch.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Arnie123

There's two different democrat parties and people mix them up ALL the time.
For one the Democrats were a right leaning party, NOT LEFT, Bernies Democrats were left leaning but you know, since the narrative and ignorance is real in the states, I am not surprised people don't know the political map even if it was thrown in their face.
Just think for a second. You honestly think a major party like the Democrats would run a socialist or liberal platform? NOPE it's political suicide in the US.

Offtopic.

If you want a conversation, Stay on the topic of the thread please.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

I was:




For one. The camera angle on Strozk made him look inhuman and up to something. But from his facial expression while Gohmert was speaking was like he was antsy to just jump at his throat and prove him wrong. Second, Gohmert was just attacking him, almost yelling and saying bunch of random 'facts' about he said she said. There was no real evidence given, no "look I have this report / citation here", just out right scolding. Edit: I forgot my third point. The second video also shows just how even tho he says no, they don't take it for an answer. What more do they want? They fabricate a story off some truth and demonize his involvement. I watched a bit of this and it was an interrogation if anything else. It was pointless and literally led to nothing more than more unnecessary democrat hate. This whole situation in the states is more than just a joke now days, it's scary. You have both sides yelling at each other for stuff that EVERY politician and EVERY political party has been guilty of in the past, but this time the republicans are taking the democrats to the chopping block because they have power and popularity right now. This is a political genocide. And people are gobbling it up.


RazoeV66:




Geez....why do I need to prove anything? Do some research on why this clown Strzok is there with his so called “testimony” He was a supposed lead “investigator” into Hillary’s email disaster and the entire time he supposed to be investigating Hillary, there are thousands of documented texts by him showing his complete bias against Trump. His “back-up” plan failed......Trump won. And while he is getting grilled, the other deranged Democrats on the committee are trying to save him with deflections.


My Reply to RazorV66:




OK. Prove it.



And I got nothing. Just insults and deflections. I called out the BS. And got retaliation against my questioning or hounded about something unrelated to the topic about Russian collusion.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:34 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs


It's sadder that Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein are PROTECTING former high-ranking Obama Admin officials.

Without them on the side of Republicans/Trump, nothing Congress does really matters, from a legal point of view.

Maybe tilting more Americans against Democrats before the Nov midterms, by exposing their mental issues, is the goal.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 09:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Arnie123

I was:




For one. The camera angle on Strozk made him look inhuman and up to something. But from his facial expression while Gohmert was speaking was like he was antsy to just jump at his throat and prove him wrong. Second, Gohmert was just attacking him, almost yelling and saying bunch of random 'facts' about he said she said. There was no real evidence given, no "look I have this report / citation here", just out right scolding. Edit: I forgot my third point. The second video also shows just how even tho he says no, they don't take it for an answer. What more do they want? They fabricate a story off some truth and demonize his involvement. I watched a bit of this and it was an interrogation if anything else. It was pointless and literally led to nothing more than more unnecessary democrat hate. This whole situation in the states is more than just a joke now days, it's scary. You have both sides yelling at each other for stuff that EVERY politician and EVERY political party has been guilty of in the past, but this time the republicans are taking the democrats to the chopping block because they have power and popularity right now. This is a political genocide. And people are gobbling it up.


RazoeV66:




Geez....why do I need to prove anything? Do some research on why this clown Strzok is there with his so called “testimony” He was a supposed lead “investigator” into Hillary’s email disaster and the entire time he supposed to be investigating Hillary, there are thousands of documented texts by him showing his complete bias against Trump. His “back-up” plan failed......Trump won. And while he is getting grilled, the other deranged Democrats on the committee are trying to save him with deflections.


My Reply to RazorV66:




OK. Prove it.



And I got nothing. I called out the BS.


Yeah sure you did.
I told you to do your own research on it.
I don’t have to prove that the deranged Leftists tried to cheat their way through the election, it’s been covered over and over everywhere.
You prove that they didn’t try.







 
23
<<   2 >>

log in

join