It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

page: 17
66
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Yeah 10AM was just as loosely adhered to. I think it was 10:18 when they had welcoming statements.




posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:11 PM
link   
Still not much proof has shown up re Trump in this case. Not much proof of Russian hacking. The social media stuff was laughable.

What about his statements showing bias?



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: rollanotherone

You don't really understand that word do you?



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: savagediver

Isn't that what perseus used to slay medusa?



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Correct me if I'm wrong, but did Peter admit that Comey was the one who approved changing the Gross Negligence wording? But then said it was lawyers "in the room"?
edit on 12-7-2018 by rollanotherone because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:12 PM
link   
Issa needs to ask if PS destroyed his devices!



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: rollanotherone

You don't really understand that word do you?
DEFLECTION!!!!!!!



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

Strawman

I don't think you understand the meaning of that word.




posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:14 PM
link   
Reading his texts, priceless.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

Why is she a moron?Because she's not republican? You're really one to talk about bias you know.




Lot's of golden nuggets in them,thar hills.
edit on 12-7-2018 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Defending an idiot. It's so silly...



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:17 PM
link   
"Of course I'm biased, but never let it influence my work. Prove it!"



This is essentially what this boils down to. I don't personally believe that he's telling the truth.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:18 PM
link   
And now we got Norton. Colbert's favorite Congress "person".



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

As Silly pointed out.

He worked COINTEL.

Their job is the absence of truth.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
"Of course I'm biased, but never let it influence my work. Prove it!"



This is essentially what this boils down to. I don't personally believe that he's telling the truth.

No. He is a guy defending his a$$ from ruin. Lying through his teeth.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:21 PM
link   
What he says/said doesn't matter.

I don't see a way for anyone to 'prove' that Strozk acted on his bias. Or didn't. No matter how bad it looks.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:21 PM
link   
Aaron Blake

@AaronBlake


The contrast here is pretty stark:

GOP in one breath threatens Strzok with contempt if he doesn't detail Russia investigation, which is ongoing.

Then it says it won't release transcript of Strzok's initial testimony ... because its investigation is ongoing.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:21 PM
link   
Watching this clown show makes me more sad for our country than anything. I dont believe anyone in that actually gives a damn about Strzok, they just wanna score political hit points for their side. Its obvious in the questions being asked, the way they are being asked, etc.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
"Of course I'm biased, but never let it influence my work. Prove it!"



This is essentially what this boils down to. I don't personally believe that he's telling the truth.


It doesn't help his case that in his position (handling the investigation of Trump) he had said that he would stop Trump from becoming president.

If you or I say that on ATS or Twitter but are desk jockies for a company, it's a bit different. When an Agent for the FBI says it about someone before they open an investigation, it looks like motive and admission to me.

That being said, he does not reflect the FBI as a whole, and I wouldn't go as far to say that there aren't legitimate aspects of the investigation, none of us know that yet.

But Strzok saying what he did prior to his involvement in a case is alarming. Anyone who's read the history on the FBI knows that it has been used to silence politicians before. That's not something we need to allow to happen.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 01:23 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

That is Fredrica Wilson.




top topics



 
66
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join