It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

page: 10
66
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:15 AM
link   
Except the Electoral college( the thing that actually determines) our elections wasn't hacked nor can it be hacked.

LIAR,LIARS.




posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: TDawg61

Actually more like the tail.

The face is much higher up.


Are you saying Strzok is the butthole of the deep state? Sounds about right.

Comey fired. McCabe fired. Strzok removed twice. Bruce Ohr demoted twice. Yeah...this is all on the up and up.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:15 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

That's your opinion.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Goodlatte lying about there being a subpoena for today's testimony.

But when all else fails bring up thirteen angry democrats.


I am pretty sure Strzok was issued a subpoena for this public hearing....and so is almost every news outlet that reported on it last week.

Seems Strzok is the only one that didn't know this....


no he wasn't.

he WANTED this public hearing.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Stevenjames15

Gowdy sounded frustrated to me. He keeps getting blocked from having his questions answered.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Stevenjames15

Gowdy generally appears unhinged because he's one of the few in Congress who don't pussyfoot around and use political correctness as the main ingredient in formulating a question.

But his substance is generally spot on where it needs to be, regardless of delivery.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Goodlatte lying about there being a subpoena for today's testimony.

But when all else fails bring up thirteen angry democrats.


I am pretty sure Strzok was issued a subpoena for this public hearing....and so is almost every news outlet that reported on it last week.

Seems Strzok is the only one that didn't know this....


no he wasn't.

he WANTED this public hearing.



I understand he wanted it. That has nothing to do with getting a subpoena for it as well.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: knoxie

Just like a crappy husband "wants" a divorce when he catches wind that he's most likely going to be served divorce papers. That doesn't mean that the papers won't still be delivered or drawn up, though.


edit on 12-7-2018 by SlapMonkey because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:19 AM
link   
Does Nadler just want to hear his own voice or something? Jesus!



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

No, that's a fact. If you think it's wrong please show evidence.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:20 AM
link   
So Strzok can't talk about an 'on going' investigation.

But those jacksnips are dropping Russia ever minute.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

Little testy off the start. STRZOK doesn't see how he could be biased in any of the investigations. This isnt going to be very productive.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: knoxie

Sorry, one does not preclude the other. Both can be true.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Does anyone know for certain that firearms are prohibited in this hearing? I'm worried we're about to see a firefight if not.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil

We know how much of that was a lie.

The FBI is impartial and yet we've seen the BIAS expressed by congressman doing their 'jobs'.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:24 AM
link   
Strzok seems super relieved that he's not being questioned right now.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:25 AM
link   
so, how do you all feel - should they release the transcripts?



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:25 AM
link   
The subpoena was for the closed testimony. Goodlatte was lying trying to muddy the waters to make it look like Strzok is being forced to cooperate when we all know he asked first for the transcript from the other testimony to be released and when they wouldn't do that asked for this open testimony.
Goodlatte ... you'll only get the evidence i think you should have and not a scrap more.
edit on 7122018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:25 AM
link   
OH MY!!!!




posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 11:28 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Everybody is entitled to their political opinion. The question isn't whether he liked trump. The question is did his views affect his work and the IG determined that it did not.




top topics



 
66
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join