It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: scrounger
I appreciated and agree with everything you've posted, except this:
f it were repealed it does not make abortion on demand (lets be UP FRONT HERE that is what pro abortionists want, no restrictions what so ever) illegal in any way...
This is a false narrative. There are no "pro-abortionists" trying to push Roe V Wade past its viability line, to allow women abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy. That's just FALSE!
Only sociopaths and psychopaths are pro-abortion. Most people you have categorized as pro-abortion are really "pro-choice".
On the other hand, there are plenty of activist pro-lifers who are just fine with forcing women to give birth to unwanted babies, and chipping away at Roe V Wade's viability line and women's rights, toward that forced birth goal.
abortion is NOT a clear right under the constitution.
Roe v wade made it a right by judicial fiat and a FEDERAL right to boot.
If you want the judges to rule against abortion laws then the framers of the constitution gave you a way.
its called MAKING AND PASSING AN AMENDMENT.
if you dont sorry but thats how the constitution works.
if abortion is so important to you personally then move to a country that has it.
if not then even if you dont like it its the constitution...
suck it up
I find it refreshing to have an non attack disagreement when discussing this option.
now on to your point
look this is an issue that abortion rights activists (the one protesting hardest for Roe V wade) is for abortion on demand.
that is NO RESTRICTIONS . In cold hard terms at any time they want "just because" to end a biological part of them.
Just look at when VIABLE LIVE children in third tri mester up to birth banning law the fight they put up.