It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Women’s March, whose mission is to “harness the political power of diverse women,” issued a statement denouncing President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee by initially referencing the nominee as “XX," indicating that it was written before the White House announcement Monday evening and sent without final edits.
“In response to Donald Trump’s nomination of XX to the Supreme Court, The Women’s March released the following statement,” the email begins.
Key Republican senators vowed Tuesday not to vote or even hold a hearing on any Supreme Court nominee by President Obama to fill the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia -- a move likely to put the replacement process in a holding pattern, for now.
First, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said his party will not permit a vote. Then, every GOP member of the Senate Judiciary Committee penned a letter pledging not to even hold a hearing until the next president is sworn into office.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
No way they would have sent that out without knowing that "XX" was there, so they are obviously continuing the narrative of division on purpose.
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Yep.
Dingbats ruled solely by emotion.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
4D chess by the women's march, triggering the triggerables.
No way they would have sent that out without knowing that "XX" was there, so they are obviously continuing the narrative of division on purpose. The more triggered people get the more emotional their responses/reactions are instead of logical. Trump is a master of it and so is the media/Hollywood. They're playing you guys so hard.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Yep.
Dingbats ruled solely by emotion.
Dingbats ruled by ignorance.
Fixed it for you.
LOL, cheeks still stinging over the delay in replacing Scalia, ya? Get over it, it happened and Kavanaugh will certainly be approved before the midterms, let alone before Trump's successor takes the office in 2025.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Yawn.
The Judicial Crisis Network had three sites on three different domains ready to go — one for each of the three on the short list. They'd also already done their ad buys in preparation for supporting anyone that Trump nominated.
Also:
March of 2016
Key Republican senators vowed Tuesday not to vote or even hold a hearing on any Supreme Court nominee by President Obama to fill the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia -- a move likely to put the replacement process in a holding pattern, for now.
First, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said his party will not permit a vote. Then, every GOP member of the Senate Judiciary Committee penned a letter pledging not to even hold a hearing until the next president is sworn into office.
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Yep.
Dingbats ruled solely by emotion.
Dingbats ruled by ignorance.
Fixed it for you.
But....but...but they wear pussy-shaped hats in public so they can't be ignorant, right ?........
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
4D chess by the women's march, triggering the triggerables.
No way they would have sent that out without knowing that "XX" was there, so they are obviously continuing the narrative of division on purpose. The more triggered people get the more emotional their responses/reactions are instead of logical. Trump is a master of it and so is the media/Hollywood. They're playing you guys so hard.
You call it "4D chess".
I call it "chutes and ladders".
They didn't get to take the ladder into the cesspool of ignorance.
They got in the "fast route"