Pedophile Antifa Leader Found Guilty Of Raping Underage Girl

originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Most states in the US, the age of consent is 16, some states are 17 and some 18.

Edit to add link:
Wiki

So most western states and Texas are 18, east cost is mostly 16.

Ah that's interesting to learn, cheers for the info
I had a 16 year old coming on to me in a bar a few years ago, she made it clear she wanted sex but I refused, heck I could have known her dad lol.
Statutory rape is not rape in the sense that I think of rape, and paedophelia is sexual interest in pre-pubescent children, not people who are younger than whatever the arbitrary age limit is set by law, and capable of creating a baby.

EDIT
Crazy you don't have a federal age of consent. You could be a sex criminal in texas for sex with someone who is two weeks away from their 18th birthday, but no problem in another state. Crazy.

a reply to: watchitburn

Communists, Marxists and leftists and pedophilia tend to go hand in hand.

Really? So pedophilia is never engaged by sick people on the right? Please, your post is so bias it should be removed. Nothing like painting one political party with a broad brush! These are the type of political attacks that will be the down fall of this country. You're not doing anything constructive to change our system by throwing out such ridiculous statements.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Europe is way different. I grew up in Croatia, on the coast where the tourism is, and I was bartending in a big club at 16. My teachers used to come and drink in my club on the weekends. And then the next day in school, my super hot language teacher would talk to me in the hallway at school and play with my tie or something, and it was all normal. Other teachers would walk by and think nothing of it.

And growing up, I never heard of anyone getting raped or abused or anything like that. Just really different, hard to explain.

"Rhodes, 24, who received funding from George Soros as part of the Antifa Portland Resistance group"

Oh, you fools are laughable,

Why the mention of Antifa? Antifa doesn't have "leaders", besides this biased article pandering to the "intelligent rightists" for clickbait


why not drop some other reports?

www.kptv.com...

"Rhodes has been a leader of the "Don't Shoot PDX"

www.oregonlive.com...

"Rhodes, now 24, was a leader of the protest group Portland’s Resistance"

www.kgw.com...

"Rhodes is a self-proclaimed leader of Portland's Resistance, a group which led disorderly anti-Trump protests."

www.koin.com...

"He's a former member of the organization Don't Shoot PDX. On Monday, the group denounced Rhodes and said he has not served in a formal leadership role since November 2016.

The group Portland's Resistance also posted a statement on its Facebook page calling the allegations serious. Both organizations said they had no prior knowledge of the allegations against Rhodes."

www.koin.com...

"The 23-year-old came to prominence in Portland in 2016 as one of the leaders of Don't Shoot PDX. He later moved over to Portland's Resistance. Both groups have disavowed him since these charges came to light."

He WAS NOT A LEADER OF ANTIFA

a reply to: Kharron

It's massively different isn't it, just the mindset. I was having sex with my mates hot mother from the age of 14 to 15, I wasn't abused at all, I loved it, I wanted it. Never told my mate and never will lol.
As I said, I won't go younger than early twenties now, I'm a father so my son's age and above is my benchmark these days.
Statutory age of consent is arbritary but required, and each case should take into consideration the maturity of the young person, as well as their own perceived consent.
I really really consented with my mates hot mother, she was no sex criminal, except in the eyes of the law because I was under 16.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

I think age of consent is good and now with easy internet and easy porn, the young are exposed to more than we were. And even if they want it, they're not mentally there yet. But as you note in an earlier post, having different ages from state to state is ridiculous -- it needs to be universal, whether it's 16, 17 or 18.

Personally, I think it should be 18. And so should the drinking age. And the age to join the military. You become an adult at that age, you get to do whatever the # you want to do.

Edit: In Europe, however, consent is good at 16, as most countries already are. Having a different outlook on sex in general prepares them earlier. USA is very prude, on the outside. Depraved on the inside.

originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Most states in the US, the age of consent is 16, some states are 17 and some 18.

Edit to add link:
Wiki

So most western states and Texas are 18, east cost is mostly 16.

The legal age of consent is 18 in the states. If one person is over 18 and one person is not, and there is a four year difference in age, it is statitory rape. Regardless of consent.

a reply to: watchitburn


I read the article.


Just shoot him. Save the state some money. Bullets are cheap.

a reply to: Kharron

Sexual exposure is definitely increased for young people these days, especially with violent sex videos, choking etc.
My son tells me it's all the rage with girls his age now but he struggles doing it, says he feels weird. It seems like learned behaviour from the internet to me.

Ah 16 is a mature age, I was living independently hundreds of miles away from my family aged 16. I knew my own mind.
...my son was out drinking with me when he was 16, UK law is I had to buy him food as well, plate of fries then totally legal. He had his first after hours 'lock-in' at a bar with me, a milestone in his life, shutters come down, ashtrays come out on the bar...ah good times...

originally posted by: Vortiki

originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Most states in the US, the age of consent is 16, some states are 17 and some 18.

Edit to add link:
Wiki

So most western states and Texas are 18, east cost is mostly 16.

The legal age of consent is 18 in the states. If one person is over 18 and one person is not, and there is a four year difference in age, it is statitory rape. Regardless of consent.

This is not right. It's 16 in a number of states. It's also 16 in the UCMJ.

That doesn't mean you're totally free to do whatever you want with someone that's 16 or 17 in those states. For example, sending lewd pics to them or receiving such pics could get you federal child pornography charges. So you can legally have sex with them, but they can't legally look at sexual pictures lol gotta love our laws. Some states also have laws against the "corruption of minors" which are vague as hell, so it can give some discretion to local prosecutors if they want to charge you with that, but that's usually just a misdemeanor.

But yeah the age of consent is not 18 all across the US.

And for the record, the only reason I know all this is because when I was stationed in North Carolina there was a discussion about this because one of our airmen was involved with a high school girl that was 16. Age of consent in NC is 16, so there was nothing they could legally do to him. He wasn't violating NC law or the UCMJ. Of course, there's the added dangers of how her parents will react lol

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: Kharron

It's massively different isn't it, just the mindset. I was having sex with my mates hot mother from the age of 14 to 15, I wasn't abused at all, I loved it, I wanted it. Never told my mate and never will lol.
As I said, I won't go younger than early twenties now, I'm a father so my son's age and above is my benchmark these days.
Statutory age of consent is arbritary but required, and each case should take into consideration the maturity of the young person, as well as their own perceived consent.
I really really consented with my mates hot mother, she was no sex criminal, except in the eyes of the law because I was under 16.

I think this is a great example. Prepubescent is always s crime and should be dealt with as such.

But in your case I suggest this is how we handle it. If the 2 parties are caught and the 13+ year old claims consent the adult should be placed in jail until the child reaches the legal age of consent. In your case 16. At 16 you should return to court. If you still claim the sexual activity was consensual and you were not harmed the person should be ser free with only a misdemeanor.

If you say you were coersed and harmed it should be a felony and treated accordingly. We shouldn't be treating what is taboo the same as we treat criminals.

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: Kharron

Sexual exposure is definitely increased for young people these days, especially with violent sex videos, choking etc.
My son tells me it's all the rage with girls his age now but he struggles doing it, says he feels weird. It seems like learned behaviour from the internet to me.

Ah 16 is a mature age, I was living independently hundreds of miles away from my family aged 16. I knew my own mind.
...my son was out drinking with me when he was 16, UK law is I had to buy him food as well, plate of fries then totally legal. He had his first after hours 'lock-in' at a bar with me, a milestone in his life, shutters come down, ashtrays come out on the bar...ah good times...

The way I look at it, if you're considered mature enough at 16 to operate a dangerous machine like a car, where literally hundreds of people's lives are potentially at risk everywhere you go if you decide to use said machine irresponsibly, you're mature enough to decide who you want to have sex with.

a reply to: face23785

18 seems daft to me but I grew up in a world where 16 gives you lots more rights. I was living and working hundreds of miles away from my family aged 16 and there was nothing my parents could do about it. I was drinking at bars as most 16 year olds do, just behave and don't be a prick then you get tolerated by bouncers/security.

Statutory rape is a ridiculous crime if the person is only just under and genuinely consented. I would never have testified if my mates hot mother got found out having sex with me when I was 14. She was no criminal in my mind.

originally posted by: Isurrender73

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: Kharron

It's massively different isn't it, just the mindset. I was having sex with my mates hot mother from the age of 14 to 15, I wasn't abused at all, I loved it, I wanted it. Never told my mate and never will lol.
As I said, I won't go younger than early twenties now, I'm a father so my son's age and above is my benchmark these days.
Statutory age of consent is arbritary but required, and each case should take into consideration the maturity of the young person, as well as their own perceived consent.
I really really consented with my mates hot mother, she was no sex criminal, except in the eyes of the law because I was under 16.

I think this is a great example. Prepubescent is always s crime and should be dealt with as such.

But in your case I suggest this is how we handle it. If the 2 parties are caught and the 13+ year old claims consent the adult should be placed in jail until the child reaches the legal age of consent. In your case 16. At 16 you should return to court. If you still claim the sexual activity was consensual and you were not harmed the person should be ser free with only a misdemeanor.

If you say you were coersed and harmed it should be a felony and treated accordingly. We shouldn't be treating what is taboo the same as we treat criminals.

That's an interesting thought, but in my case I would have refused to testify. She did not abuse me, she was hot and taught me many things about sex. The law says she was a criminal though because I was 14.
I would never have testified if she had been found out, no way.

a reply to: watchitburn

How old was the girl and how old was he when this is said to have happened.

I looked up the charge of sex with a boy and at the time this guy was 20 and the ''boy'' was 17. Hardly a pedo. GUilty maybe of rape but hardly a pedo.

According to court documents, Rhodes is accused of having sexual contact with a 17-year-old boy he met via an app in 2015.

And oh, from that same Fox source

The sexual contact was consensual, the alleged victim told police

www.kptv.com...

So other than your 'fake news'' outlet, where is your information making this guy an antifa leader. Yes, I can see where he has been called that due to standing up at a protest or two but that is an easy thing to do. During a protest it is easy to stand on a car with a bull horn and talk out. That dosent' make one a ''leader.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

I agree with you but I tend to think as a society we should error on the side of protecting children. I'm certain your activity was not likely to be found out because it was consensual.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: watchitburn

How old was the girl and how old was he when this is said to have happened.

I looked up the charge of sex with a boy and at the time this guy was 20 and the ''boy'' was 17. Hardly a pedo. GUilty maybe of rape but hardly a pedo.

According to court documents, Rhodes is accused of having sexual contact with a 17-year-old boy he met via an app in 2015.

And oh, from that same Fox source

The sexual contact was consensual, the alleged victim told police

www.kptv.com...

So other than your 'fake news'' outlet, where is your information making this guy an antifa leader. Yes, I can see where he has been called that due to standing up at a protest or two but that is an easy thing to do. During a protest it is easy to stand on a car with a bull horn and talk out. That dosent' make one a ''leader.

20 and 17 and consensual???
What a ridiculous conviction, and people are bleating 'PAEDO!!!' in this thread for something that would not be illegal in the UK and most, if not all, of the EU.
Pathetic story and pathetic thread if that's true, it belittles what paedophilea actually is.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

20 and 17 is legal in most of the world, as it should be, as long as it's consensual.

originally posted by: Isurrender73
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

20 and 17 is legal in most of the world, as it should be, as long as it's consensual.

Massively agree about the consent, and if the 17 year old did consent then this conviction makes a mockery out of US justice compared to the rest of the world.
Police state much, now I've got my conspiracy hat on again, smells like a political motive to me if he is Antifa.
...I'm neutral in the left/right US thing as I live in the UK.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

See my post above