It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Resolution on DOJ/FBI Misconduct - Is this real?

page: 4
35
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Gryphon66

But see, that is how it works.. Just condemning corruption IS inherently partisan because it goes after someone. It only appears partisan to those who would otherwise support that person or party.


... and your suggestion of a non-partisan trustworthy independent news source is?


Your own mind when it can become absolutely honest and humbled is my answer. But we all know why that will fail don't we.




posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Gryphon66

But see, that is how it works.. Just condemning corruption IS inherently partisan because it goes after someone. It only appears partisan to those who would otherwise support that person or party.


... and your suggestion of a non-partisan trustworthy independent news source is?


Your own mind when it can become absolutely honest and humbled is my answer. But we all know why that will fail don't we.


So you can't even mention ONE of these alleged uncorrupted news sources???

Thanks.



posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 07:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

I agree the biggest difference now is that we can see it more clearly. I also believe the media is more partisan than ever though.



posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 07:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Gryphon66

I agree the biggest difference now is that we can see it more clearly. I also believe the media is more partisan than ever though.


Agreed, 1000%



posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 08:13 PM
link   
A stonewalling DOJ tonight, ahead of the midnight deadline...but it won't help them. Tick...Tick...Tick...


The Justice Department also noted that due to the House requests, it has to build and deploy a search tool to look through classified systems.
Source: abcnews.go.com...

Build a "search tool"..haha.



posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Oh, goody!

An impeachment trial to provide distraction from real issues with our immigration system.



posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 08:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: carewemust

Oh, goody!

An impeachment trial to provide distraction from real issues with our immigration system.


Nope. Not gonna happen. Probably just a vote to hang a "contempt of Congress" sign around Rosenstein's neck. They did the same to "Fast and Furious" AG Eric Holder, around 2013.

But a contempt citation would make firing Rod Rosenstein entirely appropriate, by either Jeff Sessions, or President Trump.



posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 08:46 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Yeah but your boys in Congress need to sow their stuff ... letting AG Keebler do it just wont have enough joosh.



posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 08:59 PM
link   
So if by tonight all the requested documents arent surrendered then they are in contempt and are arrestable?

What does being "in contempt of congress" mean for those involved?



posted on Jul, 6 2018 @ 11:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
So if by tonight all the requested documents arent surrendered then they are in contempt and are arrestable?

What does being "in contempt of congress" mean for those involved?


Not much, actually. You won't see them getting arrested.



posted on Jul, 7 2018 @ 12:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
So if by tonight all the requested documents arent surrendered then they are in contempt and are arrestable?

What does being "in contempt of congress" mean for those involved?


The resolution that Congress passed has no legal teeth. It's called "non-binding". It merely sets the stage for contempt proceedings against Rosenstein, or for him to be fired.

From a societal standpoint, being fired is the best choice of the two. Having a contempt citation on your record shows that legal action was taken against you.



posted on Jul, 8 2018 @ 03:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
a reply to: Sillyolme

This is why independent media is growing. If MSM isn’t covering what’s happening, more news will be going independent.

Embrace change, don’t be stuck in the old way if doing things


"Independent media" is typically more partisan and fake than normal news.

IMO.


well, when they are partisan they don't try to hide it so it would appear as if there is More partisanship, because you are just so used to being lied to, the bold honesty makes you uncomfortable.

But yes, we know, it is evil and wrong to seek information that has not been approved by one of the 6 media billionaires.




top topics



 
35
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join