It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the discussions.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: MemoryShock
Police action isn't a war, and foreign leadership strife coupled with mass migration crisis has been the justification for a number of them... including Obama's stated rationale for hitting Syria (one which didn't become a police action.)
originally posted by: MemoryShock
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: MemoryShock
Welcome them. That's what I'll do.
I'm nowhere near as accommodating as you are. Cheers to you.
We're off topic, Sir. You could have done this via u2u...
But hey...you're the Mod...; )
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burdman30ott6
The precipitous fall of oil had nothing to do with it? Corruption? Nothing?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
I disagree. You're positioning that unauthorized mass migration into the US poses no threat. I'm determining a baseline of personal thresholds and how they play from private affairs to opinions on related macro-political policies.
I don't suffer uninvited guests, you do... thus we are seeing very different definitions of the word "threat."
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: burdman30ott6
I say it's a threat too.
All one has to do is look at native american displacement by european immigrants.
All the natives got out of the deal was casinos in their fema camps.
Maybe. But it seems that a lot of those funds weren't actually getting to the "masses." But it's more the "sudden" thing that doesn't ring true. It actually seems to have started falling apart from the beginning.
Oils fall sped up the lack of scarce funds being used to placate the masses, keeping them at least alive on the edge of the socialist hell.
The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the discussions.
originally posted by: MemoryShock
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: burdman30ott6
I say it's a threat too.
All one has to do is look at native american displacement by european immigrants.
All the natives got out of the deal was casinos in their fema camps.
So do we invade every country that has people escaping from it?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: MemoryShock
I'm fairly certain the EU's calls for US action in Syria were tied to their member states watching swarms of migrants overwhelm their system. The chemical attacks were the public justification, but the calls for action predated the attacks. Greece was the catalyst and they were overwhelmed months before the chemical attack.