It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There's NOTHING to excuse!
Every single accusation you've made IS ENTIRELY UNPROVEN
What Russia did is on them. Unless you have proof PRESIDENT TRUMP DIRECTLY CONSPIRED TO BREAK THE LAW none of that matters! Your mere opinion simply isn't good enough! It isn't evidence! It isn't fact. It is YOUR OPINION.
You "BELIEVE" Trump used campaign money to pay the degenerate prostitute off - where's your PROOF?
You "BELIEVE" Trump unlawfully conspired with "Russia" (WHO in Russia? WHEN?) to break an ACTUAL US law? (not "collusion" - that is not a crime - must be an ACTUAL violation of federal law)
Meanwhile, YOU have ignored every single piece of contradictory information presented.
There's NOTHING to excuse!
Every single accusation you've made IS ENTIRELY UNPROVEN
What Russia did is on them. Unless you have proof PRESIDENT TRUMP DIRECTLY CONSPIRED TO BREAK THE LAW none of that matters! Your mere opinion simply isn't good enough! It isn't evidence! It isn't fact. It is YOUR OPINION.
You "BELIEVE" Trump used campaign money to pay the degenerate prostitute off - where's your PROOF?
You "BELIEVE" Trump unlawfully conspired with "Russia" (WHO in Russia? WHEN?) to break an ACTUAL US law? (not "collusion" - that is not a crime - must be an ACTUAL violation of federal law)
Meanwhile, YOU have ignored every single piece of contradictory information presented.
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yawn. It was a summary from Vox. Quoted parts are direct from the report.
www.vox.com...
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: JBurns
We have proof his some, Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort AT THE VERY LEAST wanted to collide with Russian agents...
We know Russian agents contacted them..
We know Jr replied “I love it! Especially later this summer!”
We know they went to the meeting with Russian agents..
We know the emails stolen by the Russians were leaked in later that summer..
We know trump is a control freak so it is doubtful he all of that happened without his knowledge.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: network dude
Well that’s a totally different question now isn’t it??
And an unknowable answer unless someone is gonna poll every registered voter.,
Could it have swung a close election where with winner lost the popular vote???
Absolutely.,
Could hillary have been so ilunlikeable she loses reguardless??
Absolutely..
The actual question is “was trump in on it?”
And the email released by his son would suggest he absolutely did..
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: JoshuaCox
Joshua, these folks aren't interested in the information they keep crying for ... because it's all been provided repeatedly before and directly in the Senate's preliminary report.
They're just deploying tactics to try to, in their own minds, provide cover for Mr. Trump ... when as far as I can see, he STILL isn't under investigation personally (at least on Russian collusion.)
His admiration for Mr. Putin is obvious ... but that doesn't mean he's guilty of anything.
They are just ... what ... trembling to the core that Mr. Trump is in political danger somehow.
Do they know something the rest of us don't know?
Hmmm
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: network dude
Are you saying that Trump approved of his son meeting directly with Russian agents to acquire valuable information?
Well, that is concerning.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: network dude
Are you saying that Trump approved of his son meeting directly with Russian agents to acquire valuable information?
Well, that is concerning.
Yea, I was there.
So it is against the law to get dirt on your opponent? (again, easy answer, yes, or no)
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: network dude
I myself said, above, that President Trump isn't as far as we know under investigation.
You guys are one-trick ponies.
You continue to get the same responses because you continue pretend to ignore what you know, Dude.
It's a tactic ... just not a very good one, IMO.