It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: network dude
Blatta blatta. Please if you want to have a real conversation, drop the "aw shucks" commentary, eh?
I'm not going to explain the same things that have been explained multiple times across the board.
You can read the Senate's report, right? Even if you didn't finish college, you're still apparently literate.
Play fetch yourself on this one; take some personal responsibility if you need explanations over and above what you've been given multiple times by myself and others.
The Special Prosecutor hasn't "gained scope" ... that's both illegal and nonsensical.
Are you claiming that Mueller is investigating the Stormy Daniels material? LOL.
However, if anyone was dumb enough to use campaign funds to cover up another adulterous affair by the President, that would be concerning, wouldn't it?
You know, for anyone not blinded by TDS
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: notsure1
The American IC and the United States Senate have clearly documented these actions.
Members here, myself included, have responded to post after post asking for this information.
Take some personal responsibility and look it up for yourself.
originally posted by: JBurns
originally posted by: notsure1
A whole lot of countries endorsed Clinton for POTUS why are we not talking about them interfering in our election>
Because that doesn't go with the lyin left's' fake-news fueled narrative(s)
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Wardaddy454
A blatant lie and vapid whataboutism?
Must be a Wednesday.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
a reply to: Gryphon66
Then why did we need a special prosecutor if it was this simple?
The Special Prosecutor is examining whether Trump Campaign officials aided and abetted the Russian effort confirmed by the Senate's report.
Why are you pretending that you don't know what's going on?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Wardaddy454
Non-partisan is so funny when some people use it.
Notice the question mark?
The Trump campaign's payment to Cohen is well-established; this isn't about John Edwards.