It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Senate Says, "Hell yes, Putin wanted Trump for President

page: 18
63
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:23 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns


someone hacks our power grid and your reply is if we do anything it will start a war. sorry, that's weak to me.




posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:23 AM
link   
Now that we have all this settled, can we have investigations on other countries and institutions meddling in US elections, laws, and policies?

We could start with Israel, Canada, Mexico, the European Union, China, the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, the oil industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the insurance industry, Soros, and Koch. Any one of them has probably done more than Russia ever dreamed.

Those investigations should take us up through 2176.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:23 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

No, it didn't. Paying some liar to shut their mouth is standard procedure for politicians.

And unless you've got proof otherwise, you're just another deranged Trump hater with a story.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:24 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

PROOF FROM FOX NEWS?!!

BWAHAHAHA

The laughing stock of the world media sources??



That Fox News??


Oh man that’s hilarious..



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: network dude

You want to talk about your estimations of the intellect of those on this site, or do you want to discuss the topic?

The topic is plain and needs no further citation: the Senate Intelligence Committee has issued their report which finds that Russia interfered in our 2016 election specifically.

What more does a five year old need to understand about that?


You have stepped up to the plate, thanks.

I'm not as smart of some folks. I didn't get a 4 year degree. So when I see this topic, and I feel the obvious empty void in my soul that exists, because I truly don't understand what Russia did to sway the election, or whatever it is they are accused of, it makes me sad.

So I look forward to you explaining what it is that Russia did to effect the election.
Thanks in advance.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

The Special Prosecutor hasn't "gained scope" ... that's both illegal and nonsensical.

Are you claiming that Mueller is investigating the Stormy Daniels material? LOL.

However, if anyone was dumb enough to use campaign funds to cover up another adulterous affair by the President, that would be concerning, wouldn't it?

You know, for anyone not blinded by TDS.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
Now that we have all this settled, can we have investigations on other countries and institutions meddling in US elections, laws, and policies?

We could start with Israel, Canada, Mexico, the European Union, China, the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, the oil industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the insurance industry, Soros, and Koch. Any one of them has probably done more than Russia ever dreamed.

Those investigations should take us up through 2176.


Which is exactly why the cowards on here spewing nonsense about "Russia! RUssia RUSSIA!" should take a hint and focus on the "interference" that matters - the kind that has BEEN GOING ON FOR DECADES.

This Russia bull# is entirely discredited. I'm unsure why these liars pushing lies aren't banned on the spot for hoaxing.

I really wish they'd stop polluting my country with their virulent and bitter lies.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


However, if anyone was dumb enough to use campaign funds to cover up another adulterous affair by the President, that would be concerning, wouldn't it?


Which you're assuming entirelly. You know that is the ONLY way any of this degenerate porn star's lies harm Trump, so just like the "Collusion" bull# (which is also entirely unproven) you're clinging to it and pushing it as fact. THAT is how this bull# investigation started to begin with - liars on the left and their media DOGS repeated a lie enough times that it took hold in real peoples' minds.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Blatta blatta. Please if you want to have a real conversation, drop the "aw shucks" commentary, eh?

I'm not going to explain the same things that have been explained multiple times across the board.

You can read the Senate's report, right? Even if you didn't finish college, you're still apparently literate.

Play fetch yourself on this one; take some personal responsibility if you need explanations over and above what you've been given multiple times by myself and others.




posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:28 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

As opposed to your "proof" which is where? Come on, you act like you have evidence (SOMETHING, ANYTHING?) so present it.

Which you can't because you don't. Stop posturing. Stop feeding us bull#.

This doesn't prove your deranged "collusion" theory any more than the other bull# theories you've personally pushed here.

The ATS of old would have never tolerated such nonsensical theories.
edit on 7/4/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:28 AM
link   
a reply to: ATSAlex

Triggered much?
They need to get a stamping feet icon to go with the temper trantrum crowd.
What's gonna happen when they impeach him for corruption?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Wardaddy454

The porn star thing broke election law.


The settlement was paid out of Trump’s personal funds and had nothing to do with the campaign since their alleged one-night stand occurred 10 years before the campaign.

Secondly, Remember John Edwards? Look up how things went down with his mistress WHILE she worked for his campaign.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: c2oden

Sorry. You'll have to do your own catch up work on that.

This thread is about the Senate Intelligence Committee report and how it contradicts the House Republicans report and the administration's narrative.




He asked you a pertinent question and so far you just punted. You really have no answer, but you surely cannot admit it. Phage, you always seem to make a point of being the skeptical naysayer but it seems you've swallowed the Kool-Aid this time.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

You mean like you predicted last year? Won't happen. When he's re-elected in 2020, what will your excuse be?

When we crush your party out of mainstream existence in 2018, then what? You know why we're going to win so badly? Because you guys have wasted the last 2 years on defending illegal alien criminals, promoting racial tensions and spreading discredited Russia tin-foil conspiracy theories.

Bye bye Dem party. Enjoy your wins in California and those Northern states that no-one remembers.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:31 AM
link   
a reply to: timequake

Phage always punts.

He'll write (copy/paste) a bunch of his alternative facts (ie: only the "facts" that fit his particular agenda/narrative) and then ignore valid questions or punt with a line like above.

Posting history confirms that.

Sad too. He used to be one of the best here.
edit on 7/4/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

I may have been snarky at times, and may be a dick at others, but I can't be more serious about this at this moment. I honestly don't understand what Russia did to us. I have asked, what I thought was nicely, to have this explained.

You seem to be very vocal on this topic, so I would think you or Phage would be able to explain it. And to be clear, I understand the senate report and what they state. But they don't spell it out either, and I'm not sure they know.

So please, either explain it, or admit that you don't know either. It's cool either way.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

A blatant lie and vapid whataboutism?

Must be a Wednesday.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:33 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Don't feel bad network, you aren't alone.

13 Russians trolled Clinton supporters on the social media, remember?

Somehow that swayed an election? It wasn't the DNC rigging (that Donna Brazile exposed) against Bernie Sanders or the criminal stupidity/historic unpopularity of Clinton.... it was THE RUSSIANS (laugh)

Not even the hardcore radicals on DU believe that bull# anymore. Or at the very least they recognize it is a LOSER election strategy. Almost as stupid as an anti-gun platform. Or an "abolish ICE" platform 😂



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: dantanna

Obviously.


An alliance against NATO is much more likely these days.
We've become an AXIS nation.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Not a lie. You made the accusation, so PROVE it was from campaign funds?

Let me guess, Avenatti told you it was true? Or that degenerate prostitute Stormy whatever-her-name-was?

Give me a break. Liars are paid off FROM PERSONAL FUNDS all the time.

Women lying about sleeping with powerful men is nothing new.




top topics



 
63
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join