It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Senate Says, "Hell yes, Putin wanted Trump for President

page: 17
63
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:13 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

You want to talk about your estimations of the intellect of those on this site, or do you want to discuss the topic?

The topic is plain and needs no further citation: the Senate Intelligence Committee has issued their report which finds that Russia interfered in our 2016 election specifically.

What more does a five year old need to understand about that?




posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
a reply to: Gryphon66

Then I guess you shouldn't accuse people or "Orwellian double speak" when they aren't the topic either.


Then posts shouldn't center around blatant and self-contradictory lies.

I addressed the post; you addressed your conception of me.

/shrug


Where did I lie?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:13 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns


why aren't we doing anything to stop them from doing it again?

they penetrated our power grid and nothing was done - is that weak?

what do you think trump should say to putin next week regarding this report? if he doesn't say anything, and just accepts putin's word, is that weak?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Then why did we need a special prosecutor if it was this simple?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yet you believe the Senate vs. the House, why is that?

Who CARES about election "interference?" (whatever that means)

You don't think WE interfer in elections? Or that Russia/EU/China/every other country HAS NOT interfered in every other US election? News: they have!


I haven't said I "believe" anything, however, I would tend to trust a bipartisan effort over the rather ludicrous one-sided political effort led by Trump's man Nunes.

Who CARES about Election interference? I for one. Many others. If you aren't concerned about the reliability of our electoral processes, I really have nothing more to say.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Any time some one starts pretended no there is no evidence trump colluded put a copy of this..

Good morning Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting. The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin. What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would you be able to speak to Emin about it directly? I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first. Best Rob Goldstone




That email alone justified an investigation.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:16 AM
link   
a reply to: knoxie

Because they can't do a damn thing to us. It is called retaliation. If they attack us, WW3 is assured. That is what nuclear M.A.D. is all about. Hence why Russia has done no such thing to us.

Despite the fact that they HAVE infiltrated our cyber/power grids (just as we've done to them and almost every other country out there - ask NSA's TAO about that)

Or that we "Interfere" in elections. Ask Hati. Lybia. IRAN. Or how about UKRAINE? (or did you guys forget about Nuland's coup?)

None of this is new. None of this is uncommon. None of this matters.

This is spy-games bull# that has been leaked to the mainstream conscience. Point is, this is an intelligence/security matter NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT MATTER.
edit on 7/4/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: network dude

You want to talk about your estimations of the intellect of those on this site, or do you want to discuss the topic?

The topic is plain and needs no further citation: the Senate Intelligence Committee has issued their report which finds that Russia interfered in our 2016 election specifically.

What more does a five year old need to understand about that?


And this goes back to my initial post. How then do you quantify that interference. Russia didn't influence my decision, when it had been made before even they knew who would be in the general. Unless, you're going to suggest conspiracy.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
a reply to: Gryphon66

Then why did we need a special prosecutor if it was this simple?


The Special Prosecutor is examining whether Trump Campaign officials aided and abetted the Russian effort confirmed by the Senate's report.

Why are you pretending that you don't know what's going on?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Completely ignore the fact that HILLARY CLINTON did the exact same thing. You realize Chris Steele was a foreign agent, right? How about the fact that Steele "conspired" with Russians to interfere in our election by spreading information obtained from the Russians against Trump?

Your selective outrage is not surprising to me, based on what I've seen of your posts here.


I thought the dossier was no big deal, JoshCox? Thought "oppo research" was a normal part of a campaign? That's because it is. Only problem is that it should NEVER be taken seriously, unlike you bitter clingers who have continually clung (in a bitter way) to this ridiculous notion that it is a crime to get information on your enemies - it is not.
edit on 7/4/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

The interference has been well-documented, examined, reviewed and explained.

References to that can be found in the Senate's report and many other sources.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns


weak.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


Who CARES about Election interference?


Your a Day Late and a Dollar to Short... what year is it now?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:20 AM
link   
a reply to: knoxie

How about an actual reply? Or do you lack the facilities for that? (I bet you do)

Of course you can't reply, because I'm 100% right and you're 100% WRONG. Your ridiculous reply proves that.

Your kind makes me sick.
edit on 7/4/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
a reply to: Gryphon66

Then why did we need a special prosecutor if it was this simple?


The Special Prosecutor is examining whether Trump Campaign officials aided and abetted the Russian effort confirmed by the Senate's report.

Why are you pretending that you don't know what's going on?


Because I got lost in how much scope the SP has gained over the course of this investigation. Last I heard we were now looking into porn stars.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Who is to say Russia ever wanted a shooting war???

It very well could have been Patton and the robber barons of the day afraid America might have its own peasants revolt who orcastratrd the Cold War..


Going back and looking at the anti Russian propaganda in the 50’s all the way to Regan.. it was just SOOO blantant?...

Propaganda only conservatives would fall for today, and relatively EVERYONE bought it then..



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Chris Steele was not an agent of the UK after 2009.

Chris Steele was a respected IC contact and specialist in Russia/Ukraine.

The only thing in your post even approximating truth is that the Clinton campaign did pay for opposition research which eventually included material from Steele.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: knoxie

Ahem.

Since you're too weak/non-knowledgable to answer this question, time to drive it home. Answer, or prove to everyone else how little you know about this subject matter.


Despite the fact that they HAVE infiltrated our cyber/power grids (just as we've done to them and almost every other country out there - ask NSA's TAO about that)

Or that we "Interfere" in elections. Ask Hati. Lybia. IRAN. Or how about UKRAINE? (or did you guys forget about Nuland's coup?)

None of this is new. None of this is uncommon. None of this matters.

This is spy-games bull# that has been leaked to the mainstream conscience. Point is, this is an intelligence/security matter NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT MATTER.


Come on? Gonna run away with your tail between your legs or actually answer the question?

Of course you'll run. That's what low-information cowards do. Get a clue.
edit on 7/4/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

The porn star thing broke election law.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 09:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Wardaddy454

The interference has been well-documented, examined, reviewed and explained.

References to that can be found in the Senate's report and many other sources.



I'm not asking if there was any interference. I know there was. There is in every election.
What I am asking is how do they now quantify that. Because the next logical step is what, impeachment?



new topics

top topics



 
63
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join