It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
That is why democracy is a lie, and we live in an oligarchy. Rule by the rich.
Under socialism we'd still be ruled by the rich.
There'd just be different names on the banking accounts.
Just as an aside, name one nation that has been successfully ruled by the poor.
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
That is why democracy is a lie, and we live in an oligarchy. Rule by the rich.
Under socialism we'd still be ruled by the rich.
There'd just be different names on the banking accounts.
Just as an aside, name one nation that has been successfully ruled by the poor.
no we wouldn't be.
You wouldn't have a billionaire class who would not be able to lobby (bribe) politicians into voting for legislation that only benefits them.
I mean maybe you would be "ruled by the rich" but the rich would not be billionaires, they might be only millionaires, and thus would not be able to apply the amount of influence and power as they do today.
Whatever it would or would not be, it would certainly be BETTER than what we have currently for the vast majority of people, and that is why they (oligarchs) want to demonize socialism as much as possible, because it doesn't benefit THEM.
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
That is why democracy is a lie, and we live in an oligarchy. Rule by the rich.
Under socialism we'd still be ruled by the rich.
There'd just be different names on the banking accounts.
Just as an aside, name one nation that has been successfully ruled by the poor.
no we wouldn't be.
You wouldn't have a billionaire class who would not be able to lobby (bribe) politicians into voting for legislation that only benefits them.
I mean maybe you would be "ruled by the rich" but the rich would not be billionaires, they might be only millionaires, and thus would not be able to apply the amount of influence and power as they do today.
Whatever it would or would not be, it would certainly be BETTER than what we have currently for the vast majority of people, and that is why they (oligarchs) want to demonize socialism as much as possible, because it doesn't benefit THEM.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
That is why democracy is a lie, and we live in an oligarchy. Rule by the rich.
Under socialism we'd still be ruled by the rich.
There'd just be different names on the banking accounts.
Just as an aside, name one nation that has been successfully ruled by the poor.
no we wouldn't be.
You wouldn't have a billionaire class who would not be able to lobby (bribe) politicians into voting for legislation that only benefits them.
I mean maybe you would be "ruled by the rich" but the rich would not be billionaires, they might be only millionaires, and thus would not be able to apply the amount of influence and power as they do today.
Whatever it would or would not be, it would certainly be BETTER than what we have currently for the vast majority of people, and that is why they (oligarchs) want to demonize socialism as much as possible, because it doesn't benefit THEM.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
You can’t spell it out because it’s nonsense. When socialist countries go to war, usually with their own people, it’s capitalism. That’s the worst socialist lie I have ever heard.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
You can’t spell it out because it’s nonsense. When socialist countries go to war, usually with their own people, it’s capitalism. That’s the worst socialist lie I have ever heard.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
You can’t spell it out because it’s nonsense. When socialist countries go to war, usually with their own people, it’s capitalism. That’s the worst socialist lie I have ever heard.
The British empire (and its private capitalist forerunners) probably chalked up more deaths than the combined total of socialist regimes.
I think the broader point is that trying to compare different economic systems by counting deaths caused by dictatorships is pretty pointless.
The British empire (and its private capitalist forerunners) probably chalked up more deaths than the combined total of socialist regimes.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
You can’t spell it out because it’s nonsense. When socialist countries go to war, usually with their own people, it’s capitalism. That’s the worst socialist lie I have ever heard.
The British empire (and its private capitalist forerunners) probably chalked up more deaths than the combined total of socialist regimes.
I think the broader point is that trying to compare different economic systems by counting deaths caused by dictatorships is pretty pointless.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
You can’t spell it out because it’s nonsense. When socialist countries go to war, usually with their own people, it’s capitalism. That’s the worst socialist lie I have ever heard.
The British empire (and its private capitalist forerunners) probably chalked up more deaths than the combined total of socialist regimes.
I think the broader point is that trying to compare different economic systems by counting deaths caused by dictatorships is pretty pointless.
But a body count directly related to governance isn’t pointless. If millions die due to famine as the result of a government policy, that is a direct effect of the system.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
You can’t spell it out because it’s nonsense. When socialist countries go to war, usually with their own people, it’s capitalism. That’s the worst socialist lie I have ever heard.
The British empire (and its private capitalist forerunners) probably chalked up more deaths than the combined total of socialist regimes.
I think the broader point is that trying to compare different economic systems by counting deaths caused by dictatorships is pretty pointless.
But a body count directly related to governance isn’t pointless. If millions die due to famine as the result of a government policy, that is a direct effect of the system.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
You can’t spell it out because it’s nonsense. When socialist countries go to war, usually with their own people, it’s capitalism. That’s the worst socialist lie I have ever heard.
The British empire (and its private capitalist forerunners) probably chalked up more deaths than the combined total of socialist regimes.
I think the broader point is that trying to compare different economic systems by counting deaths caused by dictatorships is pretty pointless.
But a body count directly related to governance isn’t pointless. If millions die due to famine as the result of a government policy, that is a direct effect of the system.
Pretty sure Capitalism wins in a straight famine body count.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
we can play this game. But since every war in history has been for resources and profit, and since capitalism is a system based on making profits, every single death from war in history is a result of Capitalism.
Every single war has been a capitalist war
That by far dwarfs any claims of deaths from Socialism
What? So all wars before Adam smith were capitalist?
Have you heard of the Cambodian killing fields? Kmer Rouge? Vietnam? the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
the wars in southeast Asia and Afghanistan were largely due to heroin. Golden Triangle and Golden Crescent
Drug wars are capitalist wars. Does that need to be spelled out for you ?
Where there is money to be made, there will be wars, and millions and millions of people will die.
Capitalism KILLS. Far more than Socialism. Deal with reality.
You can’t spell it out because it’s nonsense. When socialist countries go to war, usually with their own people, it’s capitalism. That’s the worst socialist lie I have ever heard.
The British empire (and its private capitalist forerunners) probably chalked up more deaths than the combined total of socialist regimes.
I think the broader point is that trying to compare different economic systems by counting deaths caused by dictatorships is pretty pointless.
But a body count directly related to governance isn’t pointless. If millions die due to famine as the result of a government policy, that is a direct effect of the system.
Pretty sure Capitalism wins in a straight famine body count.