It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Saiker
The conspiracy theorist in me says its all planned and the American people are beingly intentionally led to one-party rule.
Admittedly, Im a Trump supporter and everything he has done so far is for the betterment of our country, but hidden in the statement
"You're going to be tired of winning" may bring upon us a time in the future where the party of war and fewer freedoms in the name of national defense becomes a clear and present danger. The alternative is to embrace a party that has gone over the cliffs of insanity and that's not an option.
Don't attack me its a conspiracy site and I didn't bad mouth trump.
FINE, fine... it's linked to "Q" (I actually have no idea) There, now everyone can move on to discussing the theory itself and not it's origin FFS. Ya know... the meat and potatoes??!!
SO.... I'm just dying to hear your thoughts on the theory
originally posted by: intrepid
I don't know who Q is. What it is or what was said. I'm sure I'm not alone in not giving a # about it. So why is this ridiculous argument going on?
So it seems like you are saying that because it was posted there first, it must be specific to Q.
The Q drops cover many different conspiracy theories, should we not discuss any of them outside of that thread either?
OK, you've moved the goal posts now, but that's fine I was waiting for that. So now you are saying, that because it is related to human trafficking, rather than because he posted it there first, is why this is related to Q? That's your "proof" now....
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: intrepid
I don't know who Q is. What it is or what was said. I'm sure I'm not alone in not giving a # about it. So why is this ridiculous argument going on?
Similar theories have been pushed by the "Q" cult for quite some time now.
When I see a poster come into a thread that they don't agree with and IMMEDIATELY bring up Q, with no reason to do so, without making ANY effort at all to respond to the thread, I think it should be very obvious what they are trying to do.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: underwerks
I’m just putting this out there, and I’m sure it’ll be roundly dismissed as crazy like most of my comments, but how about we stop looking to groups bigger than ourselves to define us as individuals?
Has this two party trash heap really led us down a better road? Ever? All I see is people being tricked into believing that other Americans are the enemy. The real winner of any civil conflict will undoubtedly be the state, that much you can be assured of.
So why fight your own countrymen just to further empower the state that you claim to be fighting against?
Absolutely. All politics are identity politics now. All the media needs to do with use certain keywords that trigger (in the actual sense of the term) appropriate reactions based on fake identities.
The majority of us who are not in the extremes need to stand up and stop this stupidity.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: intrepid
I don't know who Q is. What it is or what was said. I'm sure I'm not alone in not giving a # about it. So why is this ridiculous argument going on?
Similar theories have been pushed by the "Q" cult for quite some time now.
Not a direct theory, as you are claiming.
So can we get on with this?
Or is more character assassination in order for the OP?
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner
That "Q" garbage is an embarrassment to ATS, the conspiracy community and decent people in general.
originally posted by: loam
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner
That "Q" garbage is an embarrassment to ATS, the conspiracy community and decent people in general.
I dunno. I think it's more embarrassing to be seen as a self appointed gatekeeper of free expression.
I'm sure everyone here is really appreciative of your efforts to decide what they should be able to read and discuss.
I dunno. I think it's more embarrassing to be seen as a self appointed gatekeeper of free expression. I'm sure everyone here is really appreciative of your efforts to decide what they should be able to read and discuss.
So your problem is with the staff then. Take it up with them.
And you are insulting people that read these theories.
You know we have brains and can figure out what's what? I don't need you to tell me what I think about this.