It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Saiker
The conspiracy theorist in me says its all planned and the American people are beingly intentionally led to one-party rule.
Admittedly, Im a Trump supporter and everything he has done so far is for the betterment of our country, but hidden in the statement
"You're going to be tired of winning" may bring upon us a time in the future where the party of war and fewer freedoms in the name of national defense becomes a clear and present danger. The alternative is to embrace a party that has gone over the cliffs of insanity and that's not an option.
Don't attack me its a conspiracy site and I didn't bad mouth trump.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: IAMTAT
Can I reference this thread on Nov. 7th?
I will never underestimate the stupidity of the American public. (see Hillary 2016 campaign)
But the left is doing a wonderful job of shooting themselves in the foot. And knee. And other foot. And other knee.
They went full retard, then double-downed.
originally posted by: underwerks
So why fight your own countrymen just to further empower the state that you claim to be fighting against?
originally posted by: underwerks
I’m just putting this out there, and I’m sure it’ll be roundly dismissed as crazy like most of my comments, but how about we stop looking to groups bigger than ourselves to define us as individuals?
Has this two party trash heap really led us down a better road? Ever? All I see is people being tricked into believing that other Americans are the enemy. The real winner of any civil conflict will undoubtedly be the state, that much you can be assured of.
So why fight your own countrymen just to further empower the state that you claim to be fighting against?
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
a reply to: introvert
You are the one making false claims.
It's up to you to show all of us who disagree with you, how TAT's post is in any way related to Q.
It should be easy if you are correct.
I did. I provided a link to the "Q" thread in which the OP posted this "theory" and then deleted it to make it a thread of it's own.
originally posted by: loam
originally posted by: introvert
Why are you guys so defensive about connecting this to "Q"?
Why are you so insistent about connecting this to Q?
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: underwerks
So why fight your own countrymen just to further empower the state that you claim to be fighting against?
And you've just won..........
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
Also, this is the mudpit, so TAT is not required to make sauce.
If you a re a prolific poster on the Q thread, or if you have come up with an idea whilst discussing conspiracies on the Q thread, everything else you post is now related to Q?
How does TAT posting this in the Q thread make it have anything to do with Q, that's not evidence it's just your wrongful assertion.
If anything, the fact that it was removed from the other thread and turned into a thread of it's own, is more proof that IT WAS NOT relevant to that thread and needed to have a space of it's own to be discussed within.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: loam
originally posted by: introvert
Why are you guys so defensive about connecting this to "Q"?
Why are you so insistent about connecting this to Q?
Because it appears to be true and the basis for the accusations regarding the child sex trafficking issue. That is the "storm" that is mentioned by the "Q" conspiracy theorists.
Again, I provided a link to the "Q" thread in which the OP first posted this content.
This OP appears to be attempting to repackaging the "storm" theory and push it as his own.