The TRAP Is SET!---R.I.P. Democrat Party 2018

a reply to: introvert

It's not a Q thing. It's a TAT thing.

Thanks for the great OP TAT, strong work.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IAMTAT

Oooo..Sorry, Sherlock. My instincts...My theory. I chose as many often do to make a thread rather than a post.

Ok. But it was a "Q" thing", as I suspected.

If Q had/has the same theory...I'm not aware of it...BUT... Please feel free to show me Q saying the same thing. I'll wait.

I did not say "Q" did say something similar or the same. I asked if this was a "Q" thing, which it does appear to be, and if not what info you used to come to this conclusion.

Last time....you're getting redundant and boring.

Is Q mentioned ANYWHERE in the OP?
NO.

ALSO last time...MY theory...NOT Q's.

Nod once...if you understand me.

a reply to: introvert

Many of the topics discussed in the megathread are worthy of their own threads.

Have to admit, we are living in a time to remember. The political theatre alone is something out of a fiction novel.

www.realclearpolitics.com...

Ocasio-Cortez wants a litmus test: “[O]ur incumbents created that system. Everyone who voted for it is responsible. Period. … If they’re not actively calling for the abolition of ICE, then I don’t want to hear it. … If they don’t acknowledge that their actions were a mistake, frankly, they need to go.”

that particular type of rhetoric won't bring people to the polls....
gee who would again stay home if they don't agree with their party....

originally posted by: CreationBro

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IAMTAT

So...this is from the "Q" stuff:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

You even deleted your post in that thread so you could make it a thread of it's own.

Useful idiots on the right, talking about what the useful idiots on the left are doing.

How did I not see this was a Q thread spinoff.

At least the useful idiot righties are loud about how much they hate the leftists and their "soon to be demise".

That way theyre almost helping extremist left wing people realize the error of their ways...

The extreme lefties arent really being loud back, not in the same ways, like telling the extreme righties that they are being led into a trap, a very big trap.

The authoritarian mindsets are gaining traction in the extremists day by day itd seem, as they beat their chests and mentally masturbate to the thought of "death to the democrats!" or "end to the republicans!" All of these numb skulls are being led to the slaughter, and to think the extremists in any party are immune is #ing laughable. But ive tried so many times, as others have, to warn them of what is to come, but they all keep pushing that cart down into the pit of fire.

So enjoy your hellacious wank fest.

FYI, there'll be a fema camp awaiting new arrivals soon enough.

If the Republicans want to use the Democrats 2016 strategy, have at it.

We all know how well it worked before. I agree with you for once.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
www.realclearpolitics.com...

Ocasio-Cortez wants a litmus test: “[O]ur incumbents created that system. Everyone who voted for it is responsible. Period. … If they’re not actively calling for the abolition of ICE, then I don’t want to hear it. … If they don’t acknowledge that their actions were a mistake, frankly, they need to go.”

that particular type of rhetoric won't bring people to the polls....
gee who would again stay home if they don't agree with their party....

Historically people are voted out. So is there enough there for this to happen in Nov? We'll see.

a reply to: intrepid

yeah nobody supported build the wall at all......and most mainstream voters want to abolish ice....sure they do....

a reply to: IAMTAT

I am also wondering how Mexico electing AMLO will play into this.

He is obviously going to go hard against Ttump, but being a socialist he should be happy to welcome back his fellow countrymen and women and anyone else that is being deported or sent away at the border. Sure, not all are from Mexico but from what I have read about him I would think he would have a hard time denying anyone based on his political stance.

At least now we may be able to see exactly how a socialist administration handles their ever growing issues in a very up close and personal way.

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
a reply to: introvert

Bull, what does this particular thread have to do with Q?

If you are a regular poster on the Q thread, does that now mean you are not allowed to create topics elsewhere?

If something on the Q thread inspires my thoughts, am I not allowed to create an unrelated thread elsewhere on the forum?

His post in this thread exemplifies the kind of thinking we can expect from that camp if ever they regain power.

Spooky as hell, imo.

Trump has simply pulled back the curtain on OZ...er....I mean DC.

The corruption is there. We knew it was there but it was never pointed out but a politician. This is all about money. The Dems and the RINO's are trying to figure out how to get back on track and it is not happening.

Takes a looooong time to drain a swamp.

Mid-term elections are going to be brutal to both sides as there will be a new RINO in town that sides with the centrist and not just conservative thinking.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Let's talk in a year when I fully expect Mexico to be in financial crisis.

And when a wave of new economic refugees hit our southern border, even attitudes on the left will suddenly change.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
www.realclearpolitics.com...

Ocasio-Cortez wants a litmus test: “[O]ur incumbents created that system. Everyone who voted for it is responsible. Period. … If they’re not actively calling for the abolition of ICE, then I don’t want to hear it. … If they don’t acknowledge that their actions were a mistake, frankly, they need to go.”

that particular type of rhetoric won't bring people to the polls....
gee who would again stay home if they don't agree with their party....

I wonder if there are any historians around here who can tell us what the death of the Whig party was like?

It really does look like the Dems are not only driving toward a cliff, but accelerating toward it. Even most Democrats don't agree with these calls to abolish ICE, but despite that it seems to be their newest cause de jure.

I can seriously see the DNC splintering in the near future, with the more sensible members forming one or more new political parties in an attempt to distance themselves from the lunacy.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Last time....you're getting redundant and boring. Is Q mentioned ANYWHERE in the OP? NO.

Does someone have to mention "Q" in their OP for their information to be derived from the "Q" material?

No. Of course not.

ALSO last time...MY theory...NOT Q's.

Did not say it was "Q"'s theory. But it does relate to "Q", which is evidenced by your posting of it in that thread, which you ended up deleting and making a thread on it's own.

So it is quite reasonable to state that this topic is related to "Q" in some manner.

I've asked if you could provide some context for how you came to this "theory" and you have not done so. So it is reasonable to suggest it id derived from the "Q" discussions and is not based on any actual evidence to support your theory.

a reply to: introvert

You are the one making false claims.

It's up to you to show all of us who disagree with you, how TAT's post is in any way related to Q.

It should be easy if you are correct.

a reply to: introvert

Excellent example of guilt by association theory.

Thanks for the reminder of how so many of you roll.

originally posted by: kimish
a reply to: introvert

Many of the topics discussed in the megathread are worthy of their own threads.

Have to admit, we are living in a time to remember. The political theatre alone is something out of a fiction novel.

Indeed. Much like the "Q" stuff, this thread appears to be a work of fiction.

No information has been provided to show how the OP came to this theory, except that the OP first posted it in that thread, and it relates to the "Storm" aspect which is very much what "Q" is all about.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Let's talk in a year when I fully expect Mexico to be in financial crisis.

And when a wave of new economic refugees hit our southern border, even attitudes on the left will suddenly change.

Even then the attitude of the left wouldn't change. In fact, they would dig their heels in even further because more at the border equates to more votes for the left.

It's one of their only plays left - they'll be all for it!!

originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
a reply to: introvert

You are the one making false claims.

It's up to you to show all of us who disagree with you, how TAT's post is in any way related to Q.

It should be easy if you are correct.

I did. I provided a link to the "Q" thread in which the OP posted this "theory" and then deleted it to make it a thread of it's own.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: introvert

Excellent example of guilt by association theory.

Thanks for the reminder of how so many of you roll.

Guilt by association?

What guilt?

All I have said is that the OP is related to the "Q" stuff, and that is true. I provided a link.

Why are you guys so defensive about connecting this to "Q"?