It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is definitely an evolutionary phenomenon that manifests in our pain and pleasure centers. It feels good to help people, and it feels bad to hurt people. Of course there are always outliers who do not function the same as the majority of the population.
originally posted by: RAY1990
a reply to: Raggedyman
What's your point man? You're surely reaching...
If you want a simple answer it comes from evolution.
But no. I'm guessing God made those little fishes to clean off the whales and those Greater Honeyguides of Africa were made to serve humans and find them bee hives?
You keep making the assertion that atheists have moral code, if that's the case then no humans have a moral code. Which is a load of none sense. Hell I've seen hungry dogs before and strays that were never taught. Why don't they eat me?
You're missing one fundamental truth to life, all communication and interaction is based upon two things. Food or # off. When an animal knows it's productive to share time, resources and abilities they tend to stick to this paradigm and not betray it. Seemingly this trait is somehow remembered through generations. Because last I heard we are the only animals with an oral tradition and history.
Humans in the most basic of societies still practice banishment and forms of punishment, some of these societies have no god. Why do they follow the generalized "golden rule" system?
I'd say it's because it's in our DNA, it's a part of what makes us who we are. Many animals share this trait, not to say exceptions don't exist because they do. Within individual species this "exception" is usually dealt with one way or another.
Again what's your point?
Naturally learned traits vs artificial traits?
Lets agree that not all teacher are created equal . Lets imagine one teacher fails to teach clear distinctions about subject matter . Even in the realm of scientific discussion there are lots of disagreements . Lets make it real simple and let the kids decide . Who gets to play with the ball first . Or who gets to have the last cookie . There are disagreements across every subject including Atheism . Do you see a pattern . Its called the human condition which vary's with time and temperament . we aint perfect ,none of us . How could you expect to get a perfect agreement among imperfect humans ...can't be done .
Which ones are true Christians, and which ones are false Christians, and who gets to decide that?
Humans write human documents but you need to ask who endowed the humans ? if it was a human then who ?
yes, humans wrote that. If you will notice in that definition of the word “endowed “, It does not mention God. But even if it did mention God, it would’ve been a human who wrote it.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: kaylaluv
Lets agree that not all teacher are created equal . Lets imagine one teacher fails to teach clear distinctions about subject matter . Even in the realm of scientific discussion there are lots of disagreements . Lets make it real simple and let the kids decide . Who gets to play with the ball first . Or who gets to have the last cookie . There are disagreements across every subject including Atheism . Do you see a pattern . Its called the human condition which vary's with time and temperament . we aint perfect ,none of us . How could you expect to get a perfect agreement among imperfect humans ...can't be done .
Which ones are true Christians, and which ones are false Christians, and who gets to decide that?
The answer to that would also be other humans. We have a historical record of all the rules that societies were structured with. We can plainly see the evolution and the fine-tuning of these ideas and how they were implemented to create better or worse societies.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Woodcarver
Humans write human documents but you need to ask who endowed the humans ? if it was a human then who ?
yes, humans wrote that. If you will notice in that definition of the word “endowed “, It does not mention God. But even if it did mention God, it would’ve been a human who wrote it.
He knew that s#it would happens and despite that chose to allow each person work out their salvation before Him . Its called faith not prof . deal with it , or not
why would a God who creates such dire consequences for not believing in him, leave the only evidence of his existence in a book written by anonymous humans over 2000 years ago. When he would obviously know that, it would be translated, mistranslated, and misinterpreted, and then taught to people incorrectly?
why do some ducks not fly south for the winter and end up freezing . Why do chimps have territories ? lots of questions and lots of answers ...pick one you like if that makes you happy or dig deeper .
We also see this in other animal Societies. Where do chimpanzees get their moral values? Where do ants get their moral values?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: kaylaluv
I think you will find the bible very clear on those issues, no interpretation necessary
Sorry, not so clear. For example, Jesus didn’t say anything about homosexuality or same sex marriage - whether it was okay or not okay. Some Christians will tell you his quote about a man and a women leaving their parents and getting married should be interpreted to mean gay marriage is wrong, but it doesn’t clearly say that. It’s an interpretation.
As for science and hard wired brain
I already stated clearly that I believed the brain was hard wired
What I asked for was hard scientific evidence, those links were opinion pieces in scien i.e. Magazines, not science
There are studies referred to in the articles. The articles have references, links, and citations.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: toysforadults
You have to realize that most of the people who claim atheism are actually luciferians (side note I tried to swipe out luciferians and it came out politicians) . Oh they'll deny it till the cows come home but they are none the less.
Jaden
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: kaylaluv
I think you will find the bible very clear on those issues, no interpretation necessary
Sorry, not so clear. For example, Jesus didn’t say anything about homosexuality or same sex marriage - whether it was okay or not okay. Some Christians will tell you his quote about a man and a women leaving their parents and getting married should be interpreted to mean gay marriage is wrong, but it doesn’t clearly say that. It’s an interpretation.
As for science and hard wired brain
I already stated clearly that I believed the brain was hard wired
What I asked for was hard scientific evidence, those links were opinion pieces in scien i.e. Magazines, not science
There are studies referred to in the articles. The articles have references, links, and citations.
I am sorry Kayla but
It's not worth my time
It's all there for you to search out
I don't think you care or want the truth so why should I continue
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Annee
It's not ridiculous, people lie all the time. Go on the deep web and you'll see how prevalent it is and they fight for the same things proclaimed atheists do.
Jaden
So God is deliberately trying to trick people into NOT believing in him? And only those who will believe in things that have no good reason to be believed will be saved? Somehow? God is rewarding irrational thought?
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Woodcarver
He knew that s#it would happens and despite that chose to allow each person work out their salvation before Him . Its called faith not prof . deal with it , or not
why would a God who creates such dire consequences for not believing in him, leave the only evidence of his existence in a book written by anonymous humans over 2000 years ago. When he would obviously know that, it would be translated, mistranslated, and misinterpreted, and then taught to people incorrectly?
Why do you continue to start a discussion only to run off when you are presented with very good arguments against your beliefs about imaginary beings?
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: kaylaluv
I think you will find the bible very clear on those issues, no interpretation necessary
Sorry, not so clear. For example, Jesus didn’t say anything about homosexuality or same sex marriage - whether it was okay or not okay. Some Christians will tell you his quote about a man and a women leaving their parents and getting married should be interpreted to mean gay marriage is wrong, but it doesn’t clearly say that. It’s an interpretation.
As for science and hard wired brain
I already stated clearly that I believed the brain was hard wired
What I asked for was hard scientific evidence, those links were opinion pieces in scien i.e. Magazines, not science
There are studies referred to in the articles. The articles have references, links, and citations.
I am sorry Kayla but
It's not worth my time
It's all there for you to search out
I don't think you care or want the truth so why should I continue
Who cares if some atheists are luciferians? That has nothing to do with what atheists are, and what makes a person an atheist.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: toysforadults
You have to realize that most of the people who claim atheism are actually luciferians (side note I tried to swipe out luciferians and it came out politicians) . Oh they'll deny it till the cows come home but they are none the less.
Jaden
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
This seems rather oversimplified. It doesn't sound like he said any atheist would become a murderer simply because they are an atheist.
What I got from the video was that Peterson said a *genuine* atheist would be able to rationalize a "perfect" murder on a terrible person because they had convinced themselves that there would be no metaphysical consequences and it would be for "the greater good."
Which is a dumb argument because religions have done this very thing many times over but believed they would be free form metaphysical consequences.