It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Guardian - Facebook asks users: should we allow men to ask children for sexual images?
Facebook’s vice president of product, Guy Rosen, said the surveys were “a mistake”.
“We run surveys to understand how the community thinks about how we set policies,” he said. “But this kind of activity is and will always be completely unacceptable on FB. We regularly work with authorities if identified. It shouldn’t have been part of this survey. That was a mistake.”
In a statement, a Facebook spokesperson added: “We understand this survey refers to offensive content that is already prohibited on Facebook and that we have no intention of allowing so have stopped the survey.
“We have prohibited child grooming on Facebook since our earliest days; we have no intention of changing this and we regularly work with the police to ensure that anyone found acting in such a way is brought to justice.”
The Chinese can already down-vote a citizen into social isolation. So much power and influence in the wrong hands could see dissenters rounded up and social movements routinely suppressed. Worse still is how many people are quick with the patriot versus unAmerican BS which fuels moral panics and gets used against the citizenry.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: trollz
Could the slope really have been that slippery? Combine this with the TEDx talk about how pedo is a normal orientation. Add in the "toddlers understand consent" video and it becomes clear that there is a major agenda at play here.
originally posted by: Theosist
The “slippery slope” in regard to these issues has never been a fallacy; rather, the term has been thrown about by leftists as a straw man against a sound argument, namely: firstly, the arguments used to normalise now accepted forms of sexual deviance and cast them as morally acceptable, when followed through to their logical conclusion, must rationally lead to the acceptance of paedophilia, bestiality, etc. as “orientations”; secondly, that by removing certain moral prohibitions along with the basis for them, the leap to the removal of prohibitions against even more aberrant behaviours becomes just a step.