Donald Trump, Kissinger, Rothschild - the money and the influence

I wasn’t planning on making this thread but another thread I came across this morning made me aware that some of the very frequent posters and supporters of Donald Trump are completely unaware of the President’s ties to Henry Kissinger and to the shadow government behind him.

In writing this thread, I wanted to put in a few links to the very many threads on this website regarding Kissinger; his history, his wars, his long standing role in the old world and the new world governments… but as I searched for which threads to link to, I really could not decide what to link – there is just SO much! So, for background on Henry Kissinger I suggest a reader do a simple search on ATS for Henry Kissinger, roll up their sleeves and get ready for some reading about the vilest, darkest parts of our history.

And then we have to explore the friendship and the influence between Donald J. Trump and Henry Kissinger, spanning four decades.

Henry Kissinger has been a friend of mine. I’ve liked him, I’ve respected him. But we’ve been friends for a long time, long before my emergence in the world of politics, which has not been too long.

But I can say from a world standpoint and with many of the countries that Henry and I would talk about before the election — because I would talk with Henry before the election — we’ve made a lot of progress with many of them. We have some outstanding, and we’ll handle that as we have to handle it.

And this is no lie.

Donald Trump is said to have come under the wings of the super elites in the late 70s, when Resorts International almost went bankrupt, what would have been his first bankruptcy (he had six). In October of 1978 in The Spotlight newspaper the following people are listed as principal investors of Resorts International: Meyer Lansky, Tibor Rosenbaum, William Mellon Hitchcock, David Rockefeller, and Baron Edmond de Rothschild.

It is through this potential bankruptcy that the long relationship was forged. A senior managing director of Rothschild Inc., Wilbur L. Ross Jr., starts working for Donald Trump and only with his assistance did Trump manage to save his casinos. That same Wilbur Ross, now an employee of Jacob Rothschild years later, came to Trump's support in 2016, during his campaign. In 2017 Trump appointed him to the US Secretary of Commerce.

In March of 1992, Bloomberg writes that the connection between the real-estate tycoon and the Rothschild dynasty “should not be considered a coincidence.”

Move back to Henry Kissinger and we know that by the mid to late 80s, Kissinger, an agent of the Rothschild Inc., what is affectionately called the Deep State these days, has befriended Trump and the long collaboration and grooming began.

Here is an image of them attending a Liza Minelli show together in 1987:



Over the decades they have indeed become closer and have met more and more frequently during the campaign and since Trump took over his role in the White House.

In 2016, during the campaign, they met three times starting in May of that year. It is after the May meeting that Kissinger spoke to CNN and said that the President will most likely not be keeping all of his campaign promises as he was ‘undergoing a transition from being a campaigner to being a national strategist,’ in a televised interview.

They met three times again in 2017, the last one being in October and then again in February of this year. This is what we know; they may have met other times unofficially.

Why is this important? Why is this concerning?

I think every time you see the super elites take an interest in someone, start giving them money and supporting them, providing legal help and advice, it is worth a deeper look. When those same super-elites now start having frequent meetings with the person they groomed for years and when they are given important positions within the government it becomes more concerning. That people are unaware of this or that they ask ‘so what’s the problem?’ is the most concerning of all.

Thanks for reading.

White House . Truth in Media . Philosophy of Metrics . Anti Media . WaPo

I’m posting this in the conspiracy forums as that is what it is, but it still deserves attention and research. Some meetings are easily verifiable and some have become conspiracy decades later. I’m putting some links below that will get people started but I very much suggest that everyone do their own digging and see what links you may come across and what you can uncover. A couple of the articles I’m linking have dozens of links themselves that make interesting connections.

I also suggest that whatever interesting you find -- you archive. There have been interviews from the 80s on the internet, and there were links to the magazine where David Rockefeller and Baron Edmond de Rothschild have openly called Trump ‘a man of use’ and ‘a colorful front man’ and no copies of that magazine can now be found online, only quotes of the article. I have seen the link to the magazine, opened it and read it a couple of years ago. All traces of it are gone.

He knew the Clintons, too, and before his nomination there were accusations that his candidacy was meant to give Hillary a boost. Obviously this wasn't true.

Trump has been busy for years gathering information and how to beat them.

😎

As you start gaining wealth and class, your social circle gets really small... you are never more than a person or two away from serious power players. It doesn't mean anything nefarious, but it is just a reality.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Trump has been busy for years gathering information and how to beat them.

😎

That's one way of looking at it.

The connection is definitely there, the motive is the conspiracy part. I say money and power is the motive, as is always the case; for both sides.

a reply to: Kharron

Trump is in Zionist Pockets

And this is no lie.

Every time I see or hear those words , I think of young people.
Every single mistruth is preceded by those same words.

well, trump wouldn't have come this far if he truly was an enemy of the deep state.
imo the elite saw the winds are changing and the masses begin leaning to the right.
pizzagate appeared etc.
so the elite gave the people a candidate they can identify with.
the media outrages against him are mostly staged so the average joe even more feels like trump is one of them.

number one point of last years bilderberg agenda was "the trump administration: a progress report".

also, wasn't there a thread here on ATS linking trump to this occult paedo jew and his lolita island?

personally, i'm done with trump since his bombing of syria after this staged gas attack.
though i'm aware he's a better choice than killary.

originally posted by: Gothmog

And this is no lie.

Every time I see or hear those words , I think of young people.
Every single mistruth is preceded by those same words.

In this case, I am referring to what the President said, in those quotes.

What he said is no lie. He really is a friend of Kissinger's (and of those behind him).

a reply to: Kharron

I have friends with different political beliefs than I do too.

What is your point?

Should we hate a man because he is a globalist? I don't like Kissingers politics at all, but I wouldn't let that stop me from being his business partner.

The same with the Rothchilds. Until Trump was elected president there would be no reason, unless some of the more nefarious satanic conspiracies prove true, to avoid befriending the Rothchilds.

Trump was a billionaire business man who associated with other billionaires. Trump may be completely opposed to the Rothchild banking system but what was he supposed to do about that as a common citizen?

Again what is your point?

originally posted by: Isurrender73
a reply to: Kharron

I have friends with different political beliefs than I do too.

Are your friends considered war criminals among many around the world? Does their resume read like this; and this is just during Nixon:

Let’s consider some of Kissinger’s achievements during his tenure as Richard Nixon’s top foreign policy–maker. He (1) prolonged the Vietnam War for five pointless years; (2) illegally bombed Cambodia and Laos; (3) goaded Nixon to wiretap staffers and journalists; (4) bore responsibility for three genocides in Cambodia, East Timor, and Bangladesh; (5) urged Nixon to go after Daniel Ellsberg for having released the Pentagon Papers, which set off a chain of events that brought down the Nixon White House; (6) pumped up Pakistan’s ISI, and encouraged it to use political Islam to destabilize Afghanistan; (7) began the US’s arms-for-petrodollars dependency with Saudi Arabia and pre-revolutionary Iran; (8) accelerated needless civil wars in southern Africa that, in the name of supporting white supremacy, left millions dead; (9) supported coups and death squads throughout Latin America; and (10) ingratiated himself with the first-generation neocons, such as Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz, who would take American militarism to its next calamitous level.

Do your friends encourage you to run for President and expect positions in your government? If the answer is yes, then I may be talking with Donald Trump here.

Donny?

Trump was a billionaire business man who associated with other billionaires. Trump may be completely opposed to the Rothchild banking system but what was he supposed to do about that as a common citizen?

What has he done as a President? Beside appointing a senior Rothschild officer to the head of Commerce?

originally posted by: Kharron

originally posted by: Gothmog

And this is no lie.

Every time I see or hear those words , I think of young people.
Every single mistruth is preceded by those same words.

In this case, I am referring to what the President said, in those quotes.

What he said is no lie. He really is a friend of Kissinger's (and of those behind him).

If someone else said " And this is no lie" I would advise placing the statement in quotes.

As far as it goes , how many folks were friends with Kissinger
About all the old time rich and politicians .
Most likely.
That is who Kissinger played up to.

Great OP

Anybody who believes that Trump is fighting or has beaten the deep state is in fantasy land


The Trump presidency 100 percent is a black psychological operation on the psyche of the American people.

Trump has been held in mothballs for just this clown act he is performing by and for the elite, to do two things primarily: give credibility back to the Neocons and the MSM, and start a conflict with Iran, and he is a flack to make the deep state Syrian lost palatable.

The Russian, Putin Trump friendship is all a part of the Syrian aspect of the operation.

a reply to: Kharron


Love your work



I was reading about Trumps connection to the rothchilds the other week, its very interesting and leaves me highly suspicious he is one of their puppets.

Much obliged!

a reply to: anticitizen

To point 1, whether he's with or against Builderberg, they'd have a report/update to keep tabs on him for other members.

Point 2, epsteins brother saw him on a plane ONCE. And it wasn't the infamous Lolita express, just another one of his planes. Also it wasn't going to or from his pedo island. He hitched a ride from FL to NY.

Point 3, I was with you at first. Why bomb Syria when you know they didn't actually attack? Word is that the target was actually a satellite location where Iran was refining/processing nuclear material.

Just my thoughts and things that came to mind that I've read while going over your post.

Personally I didn't vote for the guy. I'm also no inclined to think he's with them either since he's been undoing a lot of things that are generally accepted as pushed by elites. Like you mentioned, staged events could be used to sway opinions but he seems to actively be working in the other direction. Regardless what anyone says, I'm gauging now by his actions AND results.

Cheers

Probably a good idea you did bring this up.

Trump? Was he at the right place at the right time, for a reason? Hillary would have gotten us into a full blown world war, I have little doubt. Trump on the other hand, and almost single handed, has put all us slaves back to work. That will be his legacy. Unless he did what Kennedy did, and wake up! But isn't that what got Kennedy killed?

What is it Rosenstine is really hiding? Just the corruption at the top of our country, or maybe global corruption. Surly Trump knows about the infiltration of our Government by Rothchild "Zionist" agents. One went to see him (Kissinger).

The media, even Fox, is owned by global interests, same as our Federal Reserve. When he moves on them (Trump), you will know what side he stands on. Until then, we all, are nothing but misguided finical slaves, fighting ourselves(with some minor exceptions).

Ending the Korean war? Meeting with Putin? Do I smell freedom?

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Probably a good idea you did bring this up.

Trump? Was he at the right place at the right time, for a reason? Hillary would have gotten us into a full blown world war, I have little doubt. Trump on the other hand, and almost single handed, has put all us slaves back to work. That will be his legacy. Unless he did what Kennedy did, and wake up! But isn't that what got Kennedy killed?

I'm glad you brought this last bit up, the killing of Kennedy. And I'm not discounting this happening with Trump, but it will be for a different reason. I have mused about this on ATS before.

Trump is nouveau riche, he is The Great Gatsby; in the grand scheme of things, and compared to the old money, he and his family just got their money. He has to tell everyone how much he has and he exaggerates, he defecates on a toilet made of solid gold -- he is the definition of gaudy.

He is the opposite of old money, money acquired centuries ago and passed down, and I think that as much as he thinks he is cementing his legacy and his name here and starting the transition into old money, he will be made an example of.

When his role is played out, I have this weird feeling that he will be martyred by the bosses. This would serve two purposes; for one, it would create the much needed civil unrest and a possible uprising, that would ultimately give rise to new power. And two, send a message to other nouveau riche to enjoy their money and stay where they are; there is no upward mobility at the very top, there are no openings posted when one of them dies. Enjoy your riches and stay put.

I would hate to be right about this as it would mean violence and civil disobedience, but I can't shake the feeling.

originally posted by: Kohll
He knew the Clintons, too, and before his nomination there were accusations that his candidacy was meant to give Hillary a boost. Obviously this wasn't true.

Obviously? Are you sure? Is Hillary in jail or prison? How much money is the libral media making? How much influence do those persons in the media have? $$$ is everything to those who are trying to change the world - and it is far more important than a title. A title will get your name in a history book - a good plan and a lot of money will let you write it.

originally posted by: Drque

originally posted by: Kohll
He knew the Clintons, too, and before his nomination there were accusations that his candidacy was meant to give Hillary a boost. Obviously this wasn't true.

Obviously? Are you sure? Is Hillary in jail or prison? How much money is the libral media making? How much influence do those persons in the media have? $$$ is everything to those who are trying to change the world - and it is far more important than a title. A title will get your name in a history book - a good plan and a lot of money will let you write it.

So maybe his candidacy Was meant to give Hillary a boost then... for 2020? Or are you thinking 2024? Or was the "boost" designed for a different purpose than allowing her to win the election?