It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Agit8dChop
You guys must be watching another fantasy version of the hearings. Tell me sweet thang what did Rosenstein give them besides the finger?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
I especially liked the part where they were asked about the thirteen democrats leading the investigation. And how hard they had to try to keep from laughing.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Agit8dChop
You guys must be watching another fantasy version of the hearings. Tell me sweet thang what did Rosenstein give them besides the finger?
grounds for impeachment
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: The GUT
So just out of curiosity. What would you consider a win here??? Lol
Because I can already tell you the out come..
The same outcome as the IG report and every other GOP led investigation..
They will come out and say things that sound concerning, but won’t take action against anyone since that would require actual evidence and proving it in court.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Gryphon66
Lol is there one conservative in this site that doesn’t do that??
Lol..
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Gryphon66
No more absurd than redacting info for the sole purpose of hiding embarrassment by the FBI.
Hmmm ... did I say absurd?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra
AAG Rosenstein did take the accusation that he was "hiding" material from Congress personally and rightfully so.
You're merely giving your opinion as unimpeachable fact.
No, the only reason to redact a document is not to hide "inappropriate" contact -- how absurd would that be to send to a bloodthirsty Congress?
I am not disparaging your experience or your opinion, but you tend to reprsent both here as fact ... and that's just not always accurate.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Xcathdra
I think it interesting and highly enlightening when Rosenstein quickly jumped in with, "I'm not the one doing the redacting..." as if to distance himself from that process as much as possible.