Judiciary Committee hearing on IG report - Wray and Rosenstein - 6/28 live feed

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: Xcathdra


LOL Swalwel Mr. I want your guns is triggered over Jordans questioning!

I took away from Swalwels constant interrupting is Jordan's line of questioning is something Democrats dont want answered.

and yeah the closed door hearing yesterday with Strzok was a joke. He has an FBI lawyer with him who would not allow him to answer questions.

Because ... Mr. Strzok shouldn't have the benefit of counsel? Interesting.

that was beautiful.... Jim Jordan woo..

Rosenstein putting Jordan in his place.
Put those others under oath.
Jordan accusing him of one thing and Rosenstein looking him in the face and basically telling him sorry your crappy news source is garbage. Get interested in the truth.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I dont take that question as a personal attack. It is a valid question. Why was that entire exchange dealing with strzok and contreas redacted.

The ONLY reason to redact is to try and hide inappropriate contact. He was a FISA court judge. He was overseeing Flynn's case until he mysteriously recused himself after the fact with no explanation.

Speaking from experience that is an attempt to try and salvage a prosecution by hiding the issues that could have it thrown out of court with prejudice.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Rosenstein did no such thing.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Swalwels and Lee just "outed" how a-scared they are !!!

Oh wait, now we get to hear from Hank Johnson !!

This will be deluxe.

😃😃

Is that the guy who thought Guam would tip over if too many people moved there?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Rosenstein putting Jordan in his place.
Put those others under oath.
Jordan accusing him of one thing and Rosenstein looking him in the face and basically telling him sorry your crappy news source is garbage. Get interested in the truth.

delusional...embarrassing.. is that really how you just saw that discussion?

originally posted by: carewemust
Is that the guy who thought Guam would tip over if too many people moved there?

Yeah that's him.

And he just about confirmed that the FBI has an internal problem with left overs and implants !!!!!!!!

Bet he doesn't even realize that yet !!

And they're voting in the House right now about "The Deadline" !!!!!!!!

😃💥Sun💥Burn💥😃

a reply to: Agit8dChop

They tried for a triple play Gowdy, Gaetz, Jordan and didn't even get a man on base.
They all shouted conspiracy theory and innuendo and a lot of but but but we want it!!
They want to know what the FBI has so they can report it back to trump. Everybody there knows that.

Off for another vote?

originally posted by: Xcathdra

The ONLY reason to redact is to try and hide inappropriate contact. He was a FISA court judge. He was overseeing Flynn's case until he mysteriously recused himself after the fact with no explanation.

Speaking from experience that is an attempt to try and salvage a prosecution by hiding the issues that could have it thrown out of court with prejudice.

Yeah, that caused great outburst from the Sewer and Rosenstein fidgeted all over the place and would NOT address it. I hope that question gets pursued more today as it's not only an example of redacting info that doesn't have anything to do with national security it says a lot about the malfeasance of the process.

Did they ask Rosentein about his threats to members of congress when they were doing their oversight duties asking for documents?

a reply to: Xcathdra

Yes he did.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Did they ask Rosentein about his threats to members of congress when they were doing their oversight duties asking for documents?

Yes, he denied. Said he would love to have the accuser under oath...

a reply to: Sillyolme

like i said

delusional

I cant wait for Mueller to wrap it up and expose it all...

even though it wont stop you with the nonsense, it will be nice to rub a few peoples noses in it.

a reply to: BlueAjah

He took great offense and basically said there were a few Trump appointees there that he felt would say he did not threaten.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

You guys must be watching another fantasy version of the hearings. Tell me sweet thang what did Rosenstein give them besides the finger?

I especially liked the part where they were asked about the thirteen democrats leading the investigation. And how hard they had to try to keep from laughing.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Off for another vote?

The big one too !!

💥💥😎