It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judiciary Committee hearing on IG report - Wray and Rosenstein - 6/28 live feed

page: 4
22
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: shooterbrody
HAHAHAHA
you people are a riot
how is there obstruction when the deputy director recommends firing for cause
how is there obstruction when the ag recommends firing for cause
or are they both in on the obstruction too?
or is the potus not to follow the recommendations of government officials?


It would be obstruction if he fired Comey because of the "Russia thing" and not because of the recommendations made to him.

Intent appears to be very important in the matter of obstruction.


gee, did trump fire comey before he got the recommendation from comeys boss and from the AG?
NO
did trump shut down the investigation or did it continue?
oh it continued


I did not say the investigation was shut down and when he received the recommendation is irrelevant, if we believe what he said.

Please try to stay focused and no deflect.

oh so the only things pertinent to your pursuit of "intent" is a half assed spliced sound bite from a single interview with a media personality?
well done deputy you cracked the case
what a joke




posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:53 AM
link   
RR making "relevant" by his own definition !!!

💥💥



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: shooterbrody
HAHAHAHA
you people are a riot
how is there obstruction when the deputy director recommends firing for cause
how is there obstruction when the ag recommends firing for cause
or are they both in on the obstruction too?
or is the potus not to follow the recommendations of government officials?


It would be obstruction if he fired Comey because of the "Russia thing" and not because of the recommendations made to him.

Intent appears to be very important in the matter of obstruction.


gee, did trump fire comey before he got the recommendation from comeys boss and from the AG?
NO
did trump shut down the investigation or did it continue?
oh it continued


I did not say the investigation was shut down and when he received the recommendation is irrelevant, if we believe what he said.

Please try to stay focused and no deflect.

oh so the only things pertinent to your pursuit of "intent" is a half assed spliced sound bite from a single interview with a media personality?
well done deputy you cracked the case
what a joke


I provided a quote, not a sound bite. Did I misquote him? Did he say something different than what I quoted? Please provide the actual quote, if I made a mistake.

If that quote is correct, it seems reasonable to question his intent at the time of him firing Comey.

I do not actually think anything will come of it, but it does appear that Trump put himself in an odd position with what he said.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:55 AM
link   
LOL

RR totally out of his tight little comfort zone !!

😃



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:55 AM
link   
Lets see how many democrats bitch about immigration or scotus picks.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:56 AM
link   
RR handles lying well.

he even smirks..

admire his steely resolve.. but look forward to him being prosecuted down the track
edit on 28/6/18 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:57 AM
link   
Well there's a useless question.

We all know about classified stuff Congresswoman !!

Geesh.

Deflect and relax 😃



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
RR handles lying well.

he even smirks..

admire his steely resolve.. but look forward to him being prosecuted down the track


Prosecuted for what?



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

It's one of those dysfunctional relationships i just can't quit.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Sillyolme

Don’t know why you waste your time on that one..


Have you not read her posts before? Wasting time is her thing, though usually only a few seconds on very short, uninformative posts. Hanging on to the dream of obstruction at this point is useless. Maybe it's time to move on to new and improved things to accuse the president of, as I think this one is now dead. I can't wait to see what's next.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 09:59 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

ok
a half assed quote out of context with the rest of the conversation is what you are hanging on to get your "intent" to obstruct justice?
by all means dont look at the recommendations of comeys superiors...
like i said, what a joke



I do not actually think anything will come of it, but it does appear that Trump put himself in an odd position with what he said.

"odd positions" are now justification for federal investigations?
nice
also funny how hard you argue when you "do not think anything will come of it"
so your just a troll? arguing only to argue?



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:02 AM
link   
Boom....

Gaetz got him



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Trump flat out admitted it. Once to Lester Holt and then to the Russian spies he invited into the oval office which they were only too happy to tell us about since it was a secret meeting between trump and the Russians with no American journalists in the room.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: JoshuaCox

It's one of those dysfunctional relationships i just can't quit.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Yeah it doesn't matter that he didn't get the results he had hoped for. He still attempted.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:06 AM
link   
I'm praying he says

'' a team of career agents ''

so someone can say

''.. funny.. .thats exactly how Loretta Lynch described the hit squad Stzrok convened too ''



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:07 AM
link   
oh god.. sheila jackson lee is up.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody



ok a half assed quote out of context with the rest of the conversation is what you are hanging on to get your "intent" to obstruct justice? by all means dont look at the recommendations of comeys superiors... like i said, what a joke


Please provide the complete context. Explain it to me. I'm open to other options.



"odd positions" are now justification for federal investigations? nice


No. I said no such thing.



also funny how hard you argue when you "do not think anything will come of it" so your just a troll? arguing only to argue?


I fail to see you provide any real legitimate rebuttal.

In fact, you're not making much sense at all.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:09 AM
link   
Sigh.
I can't listen live so far, so I was counting on updates from you guys, and mostly we have... NIXON.

What has happened in the hearing so far?



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 10:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Sigh.
I can't listen live so far, so I was counting on updates from you guys, and mostly we have... NIXON.

What has happened in the hearing so far?



Mainly discussing what the DOJ / FBI have done in the aftermath of the IG report. Republicans are asking questions about the clinton investigation and bias and democrats are asking questions regarding the closing of the clinton investigation.




top topics



 
22
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join