It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

some chemtrail pictures from today in upstate NY

page: 2
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 23 2005 @ 12:44 PM
link   
LMAO. SOmeone cried to the mods about me and "excessive quoting". wtf? lol. does the truth piss you off?




posted on Feb, 23 2005 @ 12:49 PM
link   
I saw some chemtrails last night here in Wa state, they were highlighted pretty well by the moon...



posted on Feb, 23 2005 @ 12:53 PM
link   
And just how ecactly do you know that they weren't ordinary contrails? did you test them?



posted on Feb, 23 2005 @ 02:44 PM
link   
joepits says:

"LMAO. SOmeone cried to the mods about me and "excessive quoting". wtf? lol. does the truth piss you off?"

I certainly didn't squeal on your posting. But what does your extensive posting have to do with "the truth". Do you really think that your posts are so threatening to anyone that they'd try to bust you to the Mods for "excessive quoting"? I certainly don't think so.

And while we're at it, joepits, when are you going to respond to all those posts on the previous thread?

When I asked why none of the "chem-trail" believers ever actually tried to find flaws in the six arguments I made at the beginning of the thread, your only response was:

"#6 is just plain wrong. Before 1998 or so "contrails" did not stay in the sky so long. This is a fact. Look in old pictures and you will have trouble finding many horizon to horizon contrails."

Well, within a day Howard Roark had posted a bunch of pictures of horizon-to-horizon contrails from as far back as the 1940's. That pretty effectively answered that argument!

(By the way, your response didn't even address what I'd written in #6. What #6 did say is that every single phenomenon used as "evidence' by the"chem-trail" crowd can just as easily (usually even more easily) be explained by normal, although varying, ambient weather conditions.

So far, Joepits, you've only attacked one portion of one of the six, and that attack was refuted in short order. The least you could do is to acknowledge Howard Roark's research.

Now, are you going to discuss contrails (or "chem-trails") in a coherent way, or are you going to accuse people who disagree with you with being Secret Agents and asking everyone to ignore them?

Sounds like you're the one not willing to look at the truth here, joepits!



posted on Feb, 23 2005 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by HowardRoark
And just how ecactly do you know that they weren't ordinary contrails? did you test them?



And that gets to the heart of the problem doesn't it? No matter how weirdly planes are pecieved to be acting it doesn't really matter - there is no evidence they are spraying chemicals.

The irony of the situation is that some planes do spray dangerous chemicals; the US military is organising spraying defoliants in Columbia:

news.bbc.co.uk...

As far as I am aware these chemicals don't actually leave any trails, so I suppose the "believers" aren't bothered. Even though there is actually plenty of evidence that the chemicals are poisoning people as well as plants. It is also pretty much out in the open, so no conspiricy (boring).

Perhaps, joepits, you should go and live in the jungles of North Columbia. When the planes go overhead you can shout "hey, they're spraying poison on me!", and it will be true for once. The advantage for the rest of us will be that you won't have an internet connection.



posted on Feb, 23 2005 @ 11:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by HowardRoark
And just how ecactly do you know that they weren't ordinary contrails? did you test them?


you dont have to test them to see if they are chemtrails. there are other identifying characteristics.



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 08:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by joepits

you dont have to test them to see if they are chemtrails. there are other identifying characteristics.


No there are not, that is just the point. All of these so-called “other identifying characteristics” are common meteorological phenomena. If a cloud can spread out and cover the whole sky, then so can a contrail. If a cloud can form “mares tails,” then so can a contrail. If a cloud can exhibit wave like patterns, then so can a contrail.



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 11:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Well, within a day Howard Roark had posted a bunch of pictures of horizon-to-horizon contrails from as far back as the 1940's. That pretty effectively answered that argument!


there is no old footage of contrails spreading out and creating clouds. in fact, when i was a lad in school, they showed us a movie on weather modification, and the state of the science(about thirty yrs. ago). they were trying to make clouds, or alternatively, to get them to start precipitating. they had little to no success, was the messsage of the flick, but they were still trying. if it were as easy to make clouds as you say, man would have been doing it for decades, now.
the pictures howard posted only show contrails coming out of (military, haha) planes. nobody is denying the existence of contrails. why do you guys keep trying to 'go there'. the time reference of those pictures is a few minutes at most(except for the sat pictures, which are not necessarily NOT chemtrails).
so, that has not effectively answered that argument to my satisfaction.



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 12:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by billybob
[there is no old footage of contrails spreading out and creating clouds.




STRATEGIC OPERATIONS (Eighth Air Force): Mission 246: 555 B-17s and 193
B-24s are dispatched to industrial areas and aviation industry plants at
Berlin, Erkner and Oranienburg but deteriorating weather and dense contrails force the formations to abort or seek targets of opportunity,

paul.rutgers.edu...



Are you familiar with the concept of supersaturation? You should be.


Specifically, their study showed that ice supersaturation occurred about 31% of the time in cirrus clouds, confirming existing assumptions regarding the frequency of homogenous (non-aerosol related) cirrus formation. However, they also found that ice supersaturation often occurred at temperatures warmer than -40C, when heterogeneous (aerosol-related) cirrus formation typically occurs.

www.pnl.gov...




Recent measurements made near the tropical tropopause during the NASA Cirrus Regional Study of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers - Florida Area Cirrus Experiment (CRYSTAL-FACE) indicate persistent ice saturation ratios (s i ) of about 1.2–1.3 in cold ice clouds (T < 200 K) even when the ice surface area is substantial [ Gao et al., 2004 ].

www.agu.org...



We find that ice supersaturation occurs 31% of the time in over 300,000 data points. We also examine the distribution of ice supersaturation with height and find that in the uppermost portion of a cloud layer, the air is ice supersaturated 43% of the time.

www.agu.org...



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 12:14 PM
link   
I would like to see a picture of two airplanes...one issuing chemtrails and the other having no trail whatsoever...in close proximity to each other...is that asking too much?

Something like this...



Actually, this one is pretty good, too..



I remember when I was young, the contrails used to start visibly behind the airplane's wing surfaces...you could usually see the gap between the trailing edges of the airplane and the beginning of the contrail.

Now these trails start directly at the wing surface...the picture above shows an example of both behaviors right next to each other...this seems indicative of two different types of trails...

Yet another example of contrails and chemtrails in close proximity...



[edit on 24-2-2005 by Geneticus]

[edit on 24-2-2005 by Geneticus]

[edit on 24-2-2005 by Geneticus]



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 12:24 PM
link   
okay. contrails can turn into clouds when there are 750 planes all going the same way. i stand corrected.


[edit on 24-2-2005 by billybob]



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 12:28 PM
link   
Geneticus, given the fact that FAA rules mandate a 1,000 foot minimum vertical separation for planes flying over 29,000 feet, those planes are definitely not in close proximity to each other.



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by HowardRoark
Geneticus, given the fact that FAA rules mandate a 1,000 foot minimum vertical separation for planes flying over 29,000 feet, those planes are definitely not in close proximity to each other.

chemtrail have been known not to follow those regulations.

[edit on 24-2-2005 by joepits]



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 01:06 PM
link   
I watch these planes all the time I live a stones throw from Lake Ontario and the jets start at dawn doing the grid pattern over the lake which in turn spreads into thin low clouds that spread over the city of Hamilton that is south west of me, by noon or if not sooner the city is cloud covered. I have a pile of photos as well, so I don’t care if these none believers spew their crap I have two eyes I see it happing before me,
It’s happening but what for is another matter.



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 01:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by joepits

Originally posted by HowardRoark
Geneticus, given the fact that FAA rules mandate a 1,000 foot minimum vertical separation for planes flying over 29,000 feet, those planes are definitely not in close proximity to each other.

chemtrail have been known not to follow those regulations.

[edit on 24-2-2005 by joepits]



And of course, you have proof of that, right?




posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 01:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sauron
I watch these planes all the time I live a stones throw from Lake Ontario and the jets start at dawn doing the grid pattern over the lake which in turn spreads into thin low clouds that spread over the city of Hamilton that is south west of me, by noon or if not sooner the city is cloud covered. I have a pile of photos as well, so I don’t care if these none believers spew their crap I have two eyes I see it happing before me,
It’s happening but what for is another matter.


You see the city cloud over as the day goes on? Oooh.

What chemicals are they spraying exactly? Ones that make clouds?



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 02:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by HowardRoark

Originally posted by joepits

Originally posted by HowardRoark
Geneticus, given the fact that FAA rules mandate a 1,000 foot minimum vertical separation for planes flying over 29,000 feet, those planes are definitely not in close proximity to each other.

chemtrail have been known not to follow those regulations.

[edit on 24-2-2005 by joepits]



And of course, you have proof of that, right?



Yes. It is in William Thomas's book "Chemtrails Confirmed". Multiple reports including some from ATC workers. But I won't be bothered to look up and retype the info for you.



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 02:52 PM
link   
Ah, William Thomas. So how mush money have you sent him? What did you pay for his book?

William Thomas is full of it.
supercell.org...


He has been proven to be a liar over and over again. Why do you beleive him?



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke

You see the city cloud over as the day goes on? Oooh.

What chemicals are they spraying exactly? Ones that make clouds?


No I see the clouds formed from the trails that had been laid over the lake, do you have a problem with that or are you trying to be witty.
and no I don't know what is in them, do you have a problem with that.
or do you have a problem with me stating what I see?



posted on Feb, 24 2005 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Off_The_Street
joepits says:

"#6 is just plain wrong. Before 1998 or so "contrails" did not stay in the sky so long. This is a fact. Look in old pictures and you will have trouble finding many horizon to horizon contrails."


I have many books showing pictures/paintings of contrails left by fighters dogfighting over Londn in 1940 and left by USAAF rids over Germany



Actually, it's the second most ridiculous. I have to go with the Secret Nazi Caves in the Antarctic that lead down into the Hollow Earth.


LMAO What about the secret Nazi moonbase one, surely that competes with Antarctica, I remember one about the 'Spice Girls too'. Chem-trails are small beer when it comes to ridiculous conspiracy theories.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join