It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Promote Work Ethic? Government Tickets Children for Selling Lemonade John-Michael Seibler By John-Michael Seibler | June 1, 2016 | 5:34 PM EDT
Quietest people ever, the only time I even see them is when they're gathering up the bee boxes from all over the neighbourhood
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: Jake56
So, what you're saying is maybe people shouldn't be so quick to use political ideology as a lazy way to judge people and, instead, use their actions.
Now that's good thinking.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Jake56
That's because the content of ones character trumps any propaganda construct being pushed, and always will. In a world of diminishing responsibility and positive proactivity, you did a good thing, it will be remembered and you have good morals and ethics, so too others who conduct themselves such as how you have.
Good stuff
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Jake56
That's because the content of ones character trumps any propaganda construct being pushed, and always will. In a world of diminishing responsibility and positive proactivity, you did a good thing, it will be remembered and you have good morals and ethics, so too others who conduct themselves such as how you have.
Good stuff
That makes no sense.
Using the same logic, anyone that tips their Hispanic waiter/waitress at the restaurant would also have "good morals and ethics".
The ability to hand over money to another individual for the work they have done is in no way indicative of the individual's morals or ethics.
It's absurd to even suggest it.
The ability to hand over money to another individual for the work they have done is in no way indicative of the individual's morals or ethics.
originally posted by: Jake56
a reply to: highvein
Ha thanks for the response. I had one job and was in mid level management and had a department of 45 employees in several plants across two states.
Although our President said that he wanted the other Managers for their next years goal to emulate my department which he said "was so well trained and so well structured such that it could run by itself", I was terminated by my bible thumping Vice President boss within two weeks of the Presidents message. It could have been a front but I don't think so. Yep the "hugging" Minister was scum. That guy berated me for years and "took me to the wood shed" daily as I had to hear his daily rants. Was it because I had a Gay male, Lesbian a Hell's Angels Biker and a 50+ something male as Group - Team Leaders? They were all excellent, decent communicators, leaders and sound human beings. I was proud to have them on staff. They made Mr. Hugg's and his boss MONEY!
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Jake56
That's because the content of ones character trumps any propaganda construct being pushed, and always will. In a world of diminishing responsibility and positive proactivity, you did a good thing, it will be remembered and you have good morals and ethics, so too others who conduct themselves such as how you have.
Good stuff
That makes no sense.
Using the same logic, anyone that tips their Hispanic waiter/waitress at the restaurant would also have "good morals and ethics".
The ability to hand over money to another individual for the work they have done is in no way indicative of the individual's morals or ethics.
It's absurd to even suggest it.
It has nothing to do with the money and everything to do with the content of ones character.
Grow up.