It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Progressives Harass Pam Bondi (Florida AG) At Movie, Police Have To Escort Her Out

page: 12
61
<< 9  10  11    13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 03:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Political affiliation will become another protected group, and we will lose a little more of our 1st amendment rights. Because millenials are freaking idiots and were never taught how to act.

If they do that, then they'll have to get rid of gerrymandering.

in a number of states, Democrats have had the majority of the vote, while Republicans take the majority of seats.

It would hurt the GOP for that to happen.


Show me one. I think you are mistaken. No R will win in a state where the D's out vote them unless they have an Electoral college set up like the USA.


originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Greven

Can't come up with a valid answer.

phfffft

😎

That you do not like the facts do not make them fake.

Pennsylvania is fun... if you look at its 18 districts, which will be redistricted by court-order due to how gerrymandered they are, you come up with this:

Total votes across districts in 2016:
Democrat 2,625,157
Republican 3,096,576

It might have been closer, but two of the district races were unopposed
District 3 (244,893 Republican votes, 0 Democrat votes)
District 18 (293,684 Republican votes, 0 Democrat votes)

For example of how bad they've packed some, check out these two:
1st District
2nd District


There are 18 districts - 18 House of Representatives seats - and 12 are Republicans.

Next?




posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 04:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: DBCowboy

Freedom of expression, not freedom from consequences.


So if you don't think appropriately, you suffer the consequences.


Yeah, sorry, but if someone's going to wear white sheets and burn crosses in the yards of black folks, I'm not going to be particularly civil to them.


I didn't say act inappropriately, I said think inappropriately.

You want to punish people for thinking differently, not just acting illegally.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 05:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: DBCowboy

Freedom of expression, not freedom from consequences.


So if you don't think appropriately, you suffer the consequences.


Yeah, sorry, but if someone's going to wear white sheets and burn crosses in the yards of black folks, I'm not going to be particularly civil to them.
yeah sorry but if someone's going to call for genocide of whites and call whiteness a plague and riot and target homeless whites, I'm not going to be civil to them At All.

Check yourself before you get checked by someone else, or lose another election.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: DBCowboy

Freedom of expression, not freedom from consequences.


So if you don't think appropriately, you suffer the consequences.


Yeah, sorry, but if someone's going to wear white sheets and burn crosses in the yards of black folks, I'm not going to be particularly civil to them.


I didn't say act inappropriately, I said think inappropriately.

You want to punish people for thinking differently, not just acting illegally.

Nope. You don't know what I want at all.
edit on 17Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:34:55 -0500America/ChicagovAmerica/Chicago6 by Greven because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: AutisticEvo

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: DBCowboy

Freedom of expression, not freedom from consequences.


So if you don't think appropriately, you suffer the consequences.


Yeah, sorry, but if someone's going to wear white sheets and burn crosses in the yards of black folks, I'm not going to be particularly civil to them.
yeah sorry but if someone's going to call for genocide of whites and call whiteness a plague and riot and target homeless whites, I'm not going to be civil to them At All.

Check yourself before you get checked by someone else, or lose another election.

Who is doing this?



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 05:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: dovdov
a reply to: infolurker

Hypocrisy much? Trump and his followers have called for and sanctioned violence against the left for nearly two years, resulting in actual death. Now liberals get a backbone and stand up to Trump and his cult with the VERY SAME RHETORIC and somehow they are now the victims. Trump has damaged our nation unlike any President in American history, and as his behavior becomes more and more unsavory and fascistic it must be opposed by any legal means necessary. If this involves protests and calling out someone who violates their conscience to work for the Trump administration then so be it. Trump and his people started this, now others will finish it. We can't get that guy out of the WH fast enough. The world will breathe easy when a sane person is in the WH again.
Trump never called for violence neither did any respectable voter for him. Your the ones who started the racist fascist rhetoric, attacked EvEN CHILDREN at rallies and let's not forget and endless list of assaults against mother's, women, children and many reasonable young men BY YOUR Kind.
To further dump this bucket of truth let's go down the list of items you all used for the very premeditated purpose of violence against his support both before and after the election.

1. Rocks(that's assault in the first degree and possible manslaughter
2. Soda cans filled with cement(also deadly)
3. Bike locks(assault with a deadly weapon against a peaceful protestor
4. Poles.
5. Bottles(another life endangering assault)
6. Pepper spray(against peaceful ralliers)
7. Skateboards
8. 30 of you assaulting a minor who was there to pick up his mom
9. Chains
10. Bricks and modified nightsticks.

The list goes on. I suggest you take your ignorance to YouTube and spend a few hours researching how often the left protestors came with intention to cause destruction to businesses and bodily harm.

You cannot find NEARLY ANYTHING THAT COMES CLOSE to the numbers of times the left has had this happen to them from the right, because for the most part it didn't. But you got one deranged fool who steps on the gas the DAY AFTER your side threw many, many cans of cement and bricks and caused bodily harm...and suddenly you think you can point the finger back? You think you have any facts to stand on?

You haven't seen the Red act up yet, not even close to the scale. You have one guy thrown out of a rally and one car terrorist. The list of atrocities so far committed by your side is almost endless at this point. You just don't hear about it because MSM didn't want you to know about the life threatening injuries caused by your protestors and also they covered up and intentionally refused to acknowledge video of the Charlottesville riots where homeless men and women with nowhere to go were targeted for their race.

Also what about that poor homeless black lady in SF that your side had the fattest Latino and six buddies stomp into the ICU for trying to protect property from being destroyed? Oh and the other one getting stomped for trying to protect Trump's Hollywood Star?

You all have shown you don't care about blacks, whites, Hispanics or anyone at all, old young, mother's, grandmother's, homeless or the helpless, you acted like vicious animals, cheered on by the media, consented to by OBAMAS SILENCE ON THESE ATROCIOUS ACTS, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER DEMOCRATIC PARTY MEMEBER WHO LOOKED THE OTHER WAY AND PRETENDED IT DIDNT HAPPEN.

And you think racism or sexism cost your the presidency? No the truth did.

You are so done I'mma have to throw you to the dogs and get another stake out the fridge. Come back with lies and I will fry them with more truth and put a fork in them. Frickin delusional robots



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kharron

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Kharron

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Kharron
I don't think we need to point fingers, I think we need to find ways not to, in fact. I don't think pointing fingers has ever solved a problem, from kindergarten to high government.

And Constitution IS key. We have to make sure it is obeyed, but we have to do so peacefully.

The government has a contingency plan for every situation, except peace... and peaceful protest. The only way to get anything done is to uphold the Constitution, through peaceful protest.

A shred of violence and we're on their terms.


I will politely disagree. Everyone seems to be so pampered and taught that anything that is said to them that might hurt their feelings is WRONG, it is time for some tough love! How can you solve a problem, find a solution when you have to walk on egg shells so as not to offend someone?


Step by step. I really don't know, I'm no Gandhi, but I see things going the bad way again, for the second time in my life and I still don't know how to stop it.

I know I can do my part and tell the story of how it went the last time and maybe some will listen. We're all on our own journey, I just hope we end up listening more to each other than we do the government, any government, or the media.

Take care, thanks for the chat.


Second time in your life? How old are you? I am 55 and NEVER seen CRAZY as I am seeing now. Honestly I have been prepping somewhat for the past 3 years. This is no accident we have come to this point, and rest assured we can all point our fingers at Washington DC and our career politicians and the MSM for conditioning us as a society to get to this breaking point?

Nice chatting with you also! We usually debate in brutal verbal combat.


I came from Southern Europe, the Balkans. Lost some people in my family, some friends... I was in high school when it all started. Watched as the kids turned on each other, families and friends with split nationalities and so on. I was in the war in Bosnia and Croatia. Then I got deployed to Kosovo with the US Army when I came here. So if this grows into a civil war, it will be my fourth.

Wait until this catches up with the kids and when they start fighting each other in schools over their parents' political beliefs. And then it gets worse.



We are there now. The only thing is there is a lot of constraint by the moderates so far. When we in the middle get attacked and, it will happen if we aren't with the D's and anti USA, then there will be a day of reckoning that will end quickly because those fools are afraid to own guns and are not trained properly in weapons handling.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 06:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
I'm not sure that what we've seen so far is any different than what we've seen before, honestly. If you remember 2010-2014 there was violence and some pretty hefty rhetoric at that point too.

And of course, most of decade from 1965-75 ...
\

What i have learned is the violence was always started by the Marxists. Those people seem to reside in both sides of the UniParty.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 06:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66

Having lived through that and thought it was horrible then, this is a ratchet up.


We will see. I'm seeing a burgeoning movement to deescalate tensions as well.


I hope we all see it, Gryph.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 06:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: randomthoughts12

I might buy a pro Trump shirt and wear it around town see what happens, been thinking about it but I live in a really dangerous area could get shot


You could do that in my town, black, hispanic and white voted for him. I wonder if you went to Birmingham or NYC where we have seen some lack of logic what might happen. Birmingham has had it's bad history and the Black community had held it's head high for the most part there. They do vote D even though those same ones from the D's were the Jim Crow law keepers. Now that baffles logic.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 06:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66

Having lived through that and thought it was horrible then, this is a ratchet up.


We will see. I'm seeing a burgeoning movement to deescalate tensions as well.
I agree with the burgeoning movement statement. I hope you are right and that it is enough. The vitriol for the last two years has poisoned my soul with a growing hatred and thirst for blood as I watch both sides(but focused on the one I have good reason to stand against) deny accountability and play some childish no account finger pointing game that somehow always ends with some copout statement. Not gonna name names.

On another note, you have changed Gryph since I've been gone.(banned) you seem to be making a reasonable effort to be more, discussion driven rather than attacking either side.. I must say I am impressed. I too have changed some as well, since Ive been away. It was a different account, Catscratch I believe it was, and uh yeah, sorry about the online harassment and threat to doxx I did. I was deservedly banned and have since restrained myself from getting personal(at least too personal) against those I disagree with. You actually have said some pretty well thought out things since I've become active again and I want to let you know I respect your new viewpoint and attitude



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 06:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: DBCowboy

Freedom of expression, not freedom from consequences.


It appears the legal consequences are you are free as long as you don't hurt me or someone else. Do you have a problem with that approach?

"Sticks and stones break my bones but words will never hurt me." Really is true. Acting on your 'feelings' in a violent way ends bad for all. For some willing to do it, they will have blood on their hands. For other of the Marxist bully class, it might end in their death at the hands of the wrong person they had mistakenly attacked, not understanding that self defense when threatened counts in a court of law. Many people prefer judged by 12 over carried by 6.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman
Self-defense when threatened didn't seem to count when Trayvon Martin was stalked through a neighborhood by a man with a gun who subsequently shot him dead after allegedly being attacked by him.

It's all a matter of perspective.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Do you believe that we should have the right to protest?



If they can do it without verbal assault, or the already happening physical assaults and spittle, sure.
edit on 26-6-2018 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 07:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: Justoneman
Self-defense when threatened didn't seem to count when Trayvon Martin was stalked through a neighborhood by a man with a gun who subsequently shot him dead after allegedly being attacked by him.

It's all a matter of perspective.


You mean it was ok for Martin to attack a stranger from behind, him being unharmed prior to his own assault or not?

I see assault by a young thug gangster who got way more than he thought he would get. I see no winners but the fact that maybe thugs in the neighborhood might think twice before attacking someone who hasn't hurt you or anyone else.

We can't attack people and expect them to just accept the beating can we?
edit on 26-6-2018 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 07:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

17-year old boy, followed by an armed man first in a truck, and then on foot when he eluded him. What was that Stand Your Ground law, hmm? No duty to retreat? Who was retreating, and who was pursuing?



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 07:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: Justoneman

17-year old boy, followed by an armed man first in a truck, and then on foot when he eluded him. What was that Stand Your Ground law, hmm? No duty to retreat? Who was retreating, and who was pursuing?


The 17 year old was stalking his victim, the other guy called the cops already, I think we know what you woulda done.
You woulda died. Me too if i accidentally attacked a guy with a gun.
edit on 26-6-2018 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: Justoneman

17-year old boy, followed by an armed man first in a truck, and then on foot when he eluded him. What was that Stand Your Ground law, hmm? No duty to retreat? Who was retreating, and who was pursuing?


The 17 year old was stalking his victim, the other guy called the cops already, I think we know what you woulda done.
You woulda died. Me too if i accidentally attacked a guy with a gun.

The boy was fleeing. The man was following him. That you don't seem to get that is disturbing.

The man called the cops and then chased after the fleeing boy on foot, after leaving his truck.

I don't know, maybe you'd like a transcript of the audio?

Zimmerman: No, you go in, straight through the entrance, and then you make a left-- you go straight in, don't turn, and make a left. #, he's running.

Dispatcher: He's running? Which way is he running?

Zimmerman: Down towards the other entrance to the neighborhood.

Dispatcher: Which entrance is that that he's heading towards?

Zimmerman: The back entrance... #ing punks.

Dispatcher: Are you following him?

Zimmerman: Yeah.

Dispatcher: Okay, we don't need you to do that.

Zimmerman: Okay.

Yet, he continued following.

You and reality are far, far away from each other.
edit on 20Tue, 26 Jun 2018 20:01:20 -0500America/ChicagovAmerica/Chicago6 by Greven because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 09:15 PM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Do you believe it's okay to have foreign influences subsidizing these protests!??



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 09:38 PM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Do you have proof that these specific protesters we are talking about here are being paid?




top topics



 
61
<< 9  10  11    13 >>

log in

join