It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Spacespider
a reply to: shawmanfromny
I wonder why nobody have bothered to dive at the Malibu beach with a gopro, exploring what people on google earth are saying look like a alien base.
If I was living in Malibu I would get started right away, whats the hold up, its been years now.. and no new information, only speculation.
What happen to the thrill of exploring the unknown.
There's no way that anyone thinks that it's a NORMAL-looking rock or glacial deposit.
So how long would it theoretically take for you to consider an alien species to settle on a planet, until you'd consider them as native to that planet? 100 years? 1,000 yrs?
If they inhabited earth for this long, and took residence in our life giving an breath taking oceans, would they really be aliens?
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: peacefulpete
There's no way that anyone thinks that it's a NORMAL-looking rock or glacial deposit.
Just like many don't think nature can produce perfect angles or square rocks so when square rocks are found its aliens?
Nature can produce very strange things that one thinks can only be done by tools
If they can be born in earths environment then when the next generation is born after they arrive is when they become native to earth. If they cannot be born here then they will remain alien until... well if they can evolve to live in earths environment and give birth here.
Wrong. An alien species which settled on a planet, would be considered "native" when they lost all memory and records of coming from somewhere else, so they would start to think they must have come from the planet that they find themselves living on.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: peacefulpete
Wrong. An alien species which settled on a planet, would be considered "native" when they lost all memory and records of coming from somewhere else, so they would start to think they must have come from the planet that they find themselves living on.
Dude you cant be serious.
here is the definition
www.dictionary.com...
do you want more links to other dictionaries giving the same definition?
If they settled and were able to live in the environment then the next generation that is born into that environment on that planet is native.
Sorry you want words to mean something else, its not the first time ATS members need words to mean something else to match their view of things.
There is literally nothing about the idea of aliens visiting Earth that has any logic attached to it. So either they don't, or they have zero capacity for logical thought, which makes you wonder how they could get here.
originally posted by: projectvxn
Are Unidentified Submerged Objects Proof That Aliens Inhabit Earth's Bodies Of Water?
They're unidentified so, no.
originally posted by: CreationBro
originally posted by: projectvxn
Are Unidentified Submerged Objects Proof That Aliens Inhabit Earth's Bodies Of Water?
They're unidentified so, no.
I think the correct answer is "maybe".
Nanotechnology and offworld bases would make far more sense.
My point is that peer review is impossible to define in operational terms(an operational definition is one whereby if 50 of us looked at the same process we could all agree most of the time whether or not it was peer review). Peer review is thus like poetry, love, or justice. But it is something to do with a grant application or a paper being scrutinized by a third party—who is neither the author nor the person making a judgement on whether a grant should be given or a paper published. But who is a peer?
Somebody doing exactly the same kind of research (in which case he or she is probably a direct competitor)? Somebody in the same discipline? Somebody who is an expert on methodology? And what is review? Somebody saying `The paper looks all right to me', which is sadly what peer review sometimes seems to be. Or somebody pouring all over the paper, asking for raw data, repeating analyses, checking all the references, and making detailed suggestions for improvement? Such a review is vanishingly rare.
originally posted by: projectvxn
Are Unidentified Submerged Objects Proof That Aliens Inhabit Earth's Bodies Of Water?
They're unidentified so, no.
originally posted by: BotheLumberJack
When I see submerged Alien Life in the Pacific, I'll believe it.
Until then... I'll leave it up to destiny.
So if we saw an airplane or helicopter flying around on Mars, you would say "That's not proof of life on Mars, because I don't know the exact model# and manufacturer of that craft, which makes it Unidentified