It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
it was hyperbole to show the possible effects of zero tolerance.
I heard the number was 40% but either way it would end if the states had the right to deport them instead of waiting on the unconstitutional ice agents do be told to do their job.
On the other hand if we had a voter id law and cut off funds for non citizens then it would be a non issue if they choose to stay no one would care as long as they do not break the law and if they did we could remove them.
Shortly after the American Civil War, some states started to pass their own immigration laws, which prompted the U.S. Supreme Court to rule in Chy Lung v. Freeman in 1875 that immigration was a federal responsibility.[12] The Immigration Act of 1891 established an Office of the Superintendent of Immigration within the United States Department of the Treasury.
Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1876)[1] was a United States Supreme Court case where the Supreme Court ruled that the power to set rules surrounding immigration, and to manage foreign relations, rested with the United States Federal Government, rather than with the states.[2][3][4] The case has been cited in other Supreme Court cases related to government authority on matters relating to immigration policy and immigration enforcement,[5] most recently in Arizona v. United States (2012).[6]
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: howtonhawky
follow our laws like I have to or get out of the country
simple
had enough of this crap my taxes are high enough already everything is taxed to death, that's the real cause of inflation as well as the Fed printing money
originally posted by: howtonhawky
do you not understand what the constitution says yet???????????????????
these things get overturned all the time
No it is not!
One comes before the other.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: howtonhawky
No it is not!
One comes before the other.
You mean one is a prerequisite for the other.
Immigration is a necessary part of naturalization. Stop your double-speak and excuses, and just say it out loud, for once, and be honest: you want open borders, and you don't care what you have to do to get them.
TheRedneck