It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: ParasuvO
Would you speak that way to someone in person?
What possible good does that serve? Are you showing a better way?
Why?
originally posted by: Xenogears
I hear it is Middle and Upper Middle not 20-30k.
Some say part of the migration is due to new taxes that start at 40+k in cali.
The idea of blue states facing loss of taxes suggests it is the wealthy moving, the ones that pay most of the taxes, not the poor.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Gryphon66
The Supreme Court said that Gay people don't have to be sold a cake, if the business doesn't want to serve them.
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
What would have been great would have been if the owner would have served her and then sat down with her for discussion and political debate.
And if you wasn't interested in a debate he could have just started blasting Mexican music on the radio
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Gryphon66
The Supreme Court said that Gay people don't have to be sold a cake, if the business doesn't want to serve them.
No, that’s not even close to what the Supreme Court said.
SCOTUS ruled that Colorado had failed to remain neutral to the bakers religious beliefs and on that basis reversed their findings of bias. In fact, Justice Kennedy made it clear that Colorado has a right and duty to protect all her citizens including LGBT ones.
originally posted by: CliffoCambridge
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
What would have been great would have been if the owner would have served her and then sat down with her for discussion and political debate.
And if you wasn't interested in a debate he could have just started blasting Mexican music on the radio
What would have been great was if the owner just served her, took the money and then went on living.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Gryphon66
The Supreme Court said that Gay people don't have to be sold a cake, if the business doesn't want to serve them.
“The commission’s hostility [to Phillips and his religious beliefs] was inconsistent with the First Amendment’s guarantee that our laws be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion,” Kennedy wrote. “Phillips was entitled to a neutral decision-maker who would give full and fair consideration to his religious objection.”
originally posted by: CliffoCambridge
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
What would have been great would have been if the owner would have served her and then sat down with her for discussion and political debate.
And if you wasn't interested in a debate he could have just started blasting Mexican music on the radio
What would have been great was if the owner just served her, took the money and then went on living.