It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lab4Us
If Republicans are as smart about getting elected as I think they are, these episodes could easily be turned into a brochure and mailed to every “...or current resident” in the US. Shouldn’t be too hard to demonstrate the rampant fascism of the Democratic Party, not allowing public servants the opportunity to freely move about and choose just because they disagree with policy of the administration currently in power.
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
I was going to say I don't see a problem with it because it wasn't done under religious, sexual preference or racist reasonings but if the person didn't do anything wrong in the restaurant and they're getting kicked out for personal reasons (religious, sexual preference, racism being a personal reason) I don't know how to feel about this, it's kind of a grey area.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Gryphon66
A place of “public accommodation” would mean that the government owns the property and no personal business operations are there. So you idea of how things works seems pretty wacked.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Gryphon66
A place of “public accommodation” would mean that the government owns the property and no personal business operations are there. So you idea of how things works seems pretty wacked.
That is not the meaning of public accomodation. You are mistaken.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
It's a place of public accomodation. Unless she was disrupting their business or causing a public heath nuisance ... this action is wrong in my book.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Gryphon66
A place of “public accommodation” would mean that the government owns the property and no personal business operations are there. So you idea of how things works seems pretty wacked.
That is not the meaning of public accomodation. You are mistaken.
Feel free to give the correct meaning then. If I am wrong I will say so. So a source would be nice or I can provide you with one if you prefer.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Sarah Sanders is the White House Press Secretary and she was "asked to leave" a restaurant because she works for Trump !!
The Democrats and anti-Trumpers are getting real nit-picky as more and more of their trash gets exposed.
And of course, many welcome the reactions because it always ends up adding (R) votes 😃
Sarah Sanders says she was thrown out of Virginia restaurant because she works for Trump
White House Press Secretary Sanders was thrown out of a Virginia restaurant on Friday because she works for President Trump -- the latest Trump official to be hounded out of a restaurant because of their political affiliation.
TMZ reported that she was kicked out of the restaurant -- The Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia -- on “moral grounds” and cited a waiter who said that Sanders was served “for a total of two minutes before my owner kicked her out along with seven of her other family members.”
Sanders confirmed the events on Twitter, saying she was told to leave by the owner because she worked for the president.
💥As 💥The💥Sun💥Burns💥
originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: xuenchen
i would sue the bejesus out of that restaurant if i were she.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
It exposes the hateful and the bigots.
LOL...Like they've been hiding!
Sure they have. I bet this owner thinks he is morally-superior to Sanders, and I wager he wears his anti-Trumpism as a cloak for the purpose of virtue-signalling. But his actions prove otherwise. He's a hateful bigot.