It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And that is why my partners and I have decided that our medevac helicopter company will not transport Trump supporters. Our sincere religious belief is that Trump supporters are unChristian bigots whose lifestyle, which includes voting for racist pigs, is offensive.
originally posted by: RowanBean
originally posted by: rollanotherone
originally posted by: Sheye
originally posted by: DieGloke
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen
Keep it up leftist douche bags!
Only a matter of time before a lot of folks going to restaurants start wondering if the chef spit in their food because of their political beliefs.
Do you regularly go into restaurant's announcing your political view publicly?
All it takes is for one server to overhear a political comment made at the table , and the rest of the servers and kitchen staff can know within a few minutes.
Yup. Ann Coulter came into my work. Within seconds the entire staff knew and we're already talking about spit in food and tainting her drinks.
Seen the movie, "Waiting"? That's why you don't piss off the workers at restaurants. But it's very unfortunate that Ann Coulter is known for his hatred so I'm sure she constantly worry at eating at restaurants.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: queenofswords
The First Amendment is not intended to give religious people their own set of special powers that allow them to trample the rights of others and claim a religious right to do so.
First Amendment protections of religion are intended to preserve the individual's ability to practice or NOT practice the religion of that person's choice. And those protections evaporate fairly quickly if the actions of the religious person interfere with the rights of others.
Do you honestly believe that religious people have extra rights?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: rollanotherone
I'd hump her leg like a basset hound.
originally posted by: DanteGaland
a reply to: RowanBean
MEH. She sticks to CHICK FIL A.
Safe haven for her types.
You truly are sick.
Well, that explains the unhinged approach to the Trumps and those who work for him. Classic control.
Do you understand the difference in First Amendment issues compared to "deeply held moral beliefs"? PhD? Pardon me if I highly doubt that claim...just sayin'.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: rollanotherone
You truly are sick.
Why aren't you saying that to the posters whose exact words were used to describe the restaurant owner first? Or, do you think it's okay to use the exact same vernacular, that I used to describe Sarah Sanders and Kristjen Nielson, to describe the restaurant owner?
All I did was take the posters' exact words, used to rebuke the restaurant owner, and used them to rebuke Sanders and Nielson. Why the blind hypocrisy?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: queenofswords
Do you understand the difference in First Amendment issues compared to "deeply held moral beliefs"? PhD? Pardon me if I highly doubt that claim...just sayin'.
I think you're the one who's out of touch deary, just sayin..."deeply held beliefs" is the "new" religion.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: rollanotherone
No you made a scenario up where conservatives get mobbed by the screaming idiot masses for merely being who they are.
No I didn't. That scenario actually happened. Although the restaurant owner didn't expel Sanders for that fear, he could have expected something similar to have happened in his own establishment if Sanders stayed.
As I understand it...the owner/manager first questioned the employees as to whether or not Sanders and her family should be jack-booted out.
Who decides to take a poll of others...before acting upon their own personal and deeply-held moral beliefs?
“I’m not a huge fan of confrontation,” Wilkinson said. “I have a business, and I want the business to thrive. This feels like the moment in our democracy when people have to make uncomfortable actions and decisions to uphold their morals.”
.........
Wilkinson explained that she queried her employees about what to do, knowing several employees were gay and all the staff had all watched the press secretary evade questions while defending Trump’s border separation policy.
“Tell me what you want me to do. I can ask her to leave,” she told her employees. “They said yes.”
The owner politely asked Sanders to step out on the patio “for a word.”
“I was babbling a little, but I got my point across in a polite and direct fashion,” Wilkinson said. “I explained that the restaurant has certain standards that I feel it has to uphold, such as honesty, and compassion, and cooperation.”
After explaining her reasoning, she said, “I’d like to ask you to leave.”
Sanders stepped back inside to collect her belongings, then left the establishment, later complaining about her ejection on Twitter.
“We just felt there are moments in time when people need to live their convictions,” the owner explained. “This appeared to be one.”
originally posted by: Muninn
a reply to: Aazadan
These people need to be blacklisted.
Why is that, is it because only opinions like yours should be heard?
All this petty back and forth is going to lead to a whole lot of ugliness.
Careful what you wish for.