It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Philosopher Karl Popper defined the paradox in 1945 in The Open Society and Its Enemies Vol. 1 (in note 4 to Chapter 7).
If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
Now you're just spouting unsubstantiated BS.
originally posted by: DanteGaland
Paradox of Tolerance
Philosopher Karl Popper defined the paradox in 1945 in The Open Society and Its Enemies Vol. 1 (in note 4 to Chapter 7).
TLDR for challenged:
If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
Would you like to know more?
I don't have to TOLERATE intolerance, bigotry ect.
originally posted by: JBurns
Again, US citizens are separated from their children all the time. If a single parent commits a crime and is arrested, the children have to be cared for. If family/etc aren't available/are unwilling to care for the minors then they're placed into state custody.
Those ignoring this fact are exposing this disingenuous arguments. Plenty of US citizen criminals face this same consequence of breaking our laws.
Further, that vast 80% of unaccompanied minors are sent there WILLINGLY and KNOWINGLY by their parents back home in their real/actual country. The parents are choosing to split with 80% of these unaccompanied minors
Obviously all illegals need to be detained (and their children housed/cared for) until they can be repatriated to their home country/sent home or until a legitimate and valid asylum request can be granted. Again, asylum requests would be practical if all the fraudsters and scammers and freeloading illegals weren't abusing the system to gain admittance to our country.
We don't need or want those criminals here.
originally posted by: ker2010
originally posted by: JBurns
Again, US citizens are separated from their children all the time. If a single parent commits a crime and is arrested, the children have to be cared for. If family/etc aren't available/are unwilling to care for the minors then they're placed into state custody.
Those ignoring this fact are exposing this disingenuous arguments. Plenty of US citizen criminals face this same consequence of breaking our laws.
Further, that vast 80% of unaccompanied minors are sent there WILLINGLY and KNOWINGLY by their parents back home in their real/actual country. The parents are choosing to split with 80% of these unaccompanied minors
Obviously all illegals need to be detained (and their children housed/cared for) until they can be repatriated to their home country/sent home or until a legitimate and valid asylum request can be granted. Again, asylum requests would be practical if all the fraudsters and scammers and freeloading illegals weren't abusing the system to gain admittance to our country.
We don't need or want those criminals here.
See this should make sense to ANYONE who thinks logically, and does not base everything on pure emotions.
Everything stated here should be logical common sense on the same level of common sense as not petting a rattlesnake.