It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: angeldoll
Has anybody mentioned that "He" also said the election was rigged?
Until he won? (because he expected to lose)
After being elected he said "I guess it wasn't rigged". (Not "I was wrong".)
And obviously now he is expecting to be guilty of all manner of wrongdoing?
He's just trying to stay a step ahead.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
The amount of effort put into the OP is the amount of effort you'll get from my replies. Sound fair? Not much to add when the OP is literally a screen capture of a Tweet.
That's what peeks my interest the most.
How can this tweet be taken to such dramatic extremes, such as with the descriptor "bombshell", when there is no other context to go with it. Literally, the OP is very void of context and is, honestly, quite lazy.
It's an ATS soap opera thread created to stir up bickering and be a vehicle of the OP's partisan douchebaggery. Yet the same grown man that posts threads for dramatic effect, sourced from twitter of all places, has the balls to question someone else's intelligence?
Since you and unenlightened would rather discuss posting contributions, threads, OPs and low-information, instead of the team-Hillarys 'Trump colluded with Russia' fake narrative pushed onto the MSM, I posit the fact that you are too low-information and scared to man-up and be a consistent thread creator.
21,000+ posts in 3 years, thats about 18 posts per day, every day. You've made 23 pathetic threads, the last one being 18 months ago.
No-one cares for your contributions because they are all pathtic and weak sauce with no substance.
ATS has Lions and it has rabbits.
You and unenlightened fall squarely into the category of rabbits - pathetic & useless eaters, frightened to face the community on your own merits, instead, hiding in the threads of the Lions hoping your status can be elevated.
A piss-poor excuse for 'Americans' - thank god you are the minority.
...(Lady Lynn Rothschild knows well and I am sorry say that I supported the McCain/Palin ticket the final weeks-I truly believed Sen McCain was more likely include you his cabinet).
BTW, would like your campaign staff for the 2016 election!
Gods speed and tight hug,
DNC Platform Committee Member
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Gryphon66
Ummm how about writing her exoneration months before interviewing her? Then using the excuse of 'no intent' (when none was required) as the grounds for not pursuing charges?
Thre's also lots of evidence sanders was cheated. Just look for it.
They didn't have to interview her to know that there was no apparent intent to distribute classified data to our enemies.
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Pointedly, the Midyear Investigation found that there was not reason to prosecute Clinton or her staff under those statues.
Further, the OIG just found that there were no issues of bias regarding those decisions, and that the decisions not to prosecute were in harmony with DOJ policy and history.
The MYE prosecutors stated [in reference to 793(f)]:
[T]he government would likely face a colorable constitutional challenge
to the statute if it prosecuted an individual for committing gross
negligence who was both unaware he had removed classified
information at the time of the removal and never became aware he
had done so.... Moreover, in bringing a vagueness challenge, defense
counsel would also likely point to the significant disagreement as to
the meaning of “gross negligence.”
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
This is going to dominate the MSM. Standby for further info, but it reminds me of when he accused Obama of wiretapping his tower.
originally posted by: blueman12
It's hard to not come to the conclusion that trump is ego-focused and impulsive. Sure, he might be good at his previous job, but he's a terrible president.
He has been the most open president, but used his massive voice for mostly nonsense. It doesn't matter if the elites and bankers are after him. His behavior has been unacceptable for a man of that position.