It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Nazi Peril

page: 12
63
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 24 2018 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy


No one likes the Nazi's. No one.


Precisely


Conflating your political opponents opposing ideology with Hitler's vile Nazi Germany is beyond wrong. It is insulting to those who survived atrocities from a genocidal and raving mad totalitarian. Ridiculous that some feel this is acceptable.

To be clear: Trump has done nothing to warrant this bull# nor have us Trump voters in casting our vote for America.




posted on Jun, 25 2018 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven


If slaves were fully counted as a person for purposes of representation, the Civil War would not have occurred when it did. It's possible that it might have occurred later, as Northern population continued to grow. If slaves were not counted as a person for purposes of representation, Southern states would not have enjoyed half a century of political dominance.


It is kind of silly that they were people for one purpose, but animals for all other purposes.




Recall, what I responded to, though:

Dehumanization of people seems to be a big thing these days.

I'm merely pointing out that it's not a recent thing. Slaves were dehumanized for political power - by both sides.


When an economy fails, and people are faced with a choice between either:

A: Failing to feed all the humans

or

B: Not counting some people as human, but succeeding at feeding all the ones they do count

It's easy sometimes to choose B. You feel like less of a failure somehow.



posted on Jun, 25 2018 @ 11:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: bobs_uruncle


Newsflash: Fidel censored the press as well. Whatabout the whataboutisms? And now censorship without affordable healthcare for everyone is suddenly a good thing due to Obama, weird progressives and Cuba. WTF.

Is there a "make everything worse" angle "for the good", that I simply don't get?


Lots of dictators an non-dictators have censored the press, but you missed the point. Publishing lies I think is libel when comes to corporations. Publishing lies when it comes to politics/governments in order change the government I think is sedition or maybe treason. Why does the lamestream media get away with libel, sedition and/or treason?

Hell, Opariah made a public noise about about beef and she was sued up the Ying yang. Why is ok, for the lamestream media and not Opariah?

Cheers - Dave



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 12:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

There are very specific conditions that have to be met before a charge of treason applies.




It's high time the government step in and properly regulate the lamestream media, hand out prison sentences to CEO's


Have a serious think about it - when you call for the type of regulation you are advocating its very Orwellian. Ministry of Truth and all that.

hint: Pravda Newspaper

Goebells control of the Press - the head of the Ministry of Popular Enlightenment and Propaganda.


There is far too much social engineering going on in the msm, it's quite apparent. It's objective seems to be to widen the rift between opposing viewpoints. It calls for the replacement of government daily based on lies, twisted editorials and ridiculous "experts". The media is weaponized, as such, it presents a clear danger as it is promoting civil war over a president doing principally the right things. Admittedly, the guy couldn't deliver a ham sandwich as far as his eloquence or lack of with speeches. FFS's though, the media has gone batsh** stupid and it appears is trying to prevent him from doing his job. There's something seriously wrong with that and to be honest, it look like treason. It's comparable to mutiny, but on a grander scale.

Cheers - Dave
edit on 6/26.2018 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 05:45 AM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Hey Dave,

I completely agree with you. They say that the MSM is controlled by 5 corporations and that cannot be a good thing.

However I still think Govt control will be even nastier - imagine the likes of the Govt of the day making back door deals with what gets pushed...oh wait they do it already...


www.collective-evolution.com...


A declassified document from the CIA archives in the form of a letter from a CIA task force addressed to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency details the close relationship that exists between the CIA and mainstream media and academia.
The document states that the CIA task force “now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,”


Rupert Murdoch of News Corp was playing both sides from the beginning of his News empire

www.humantruth.info...


In 1968 he done a secret deal with the Deputy Prime Minister of Australia ('Black Jack' McEwen) to destroy the political career of Billy McMahon, a rival1. The Secret Service were told to investigate fake claims, and Murdoch ran the story, causing an outcry against Billy McMahon. He also played with the careers of Gough Whitlam and Malcolm Fraser.

In 1969 Murdoch swapped favours to get the law changed so he could export business assets, and began his global career1. He engaged in the same political chess in the UK, dealing with Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Woodrow Wyatt and then Tony Blair. A deal with Thatcher exchanged positive reporting in the news for the securing of Murdoch's purchase of The Times and The Sunday Times2,3.

A Government investigation in 2011 and 2012 saw Murdoch reveal that when he switched his paper's support from Labour to the Conservatives the Prime Minister (a close personal friend) called him with bitter threats.

The true story is that these politically corrupt relationships with Murdoch shouldn't have developed in the first place. Murdoch's staff also frequently developed close personal relationships with key senior police officials, skewing and preventing some police investigations into journalistic misbehaviour4.



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 05:51 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

If you get called "Nazi" a lot you might want to ask yourself what opinions you are expressing that might strike people as being "Nazi?" They are calling you a "Nazi," not a "Commie," a "Pinko," a "Zionist," or a "Race Traitor." Why is that, do you suppose?



posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 07:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: DBCowboy

If you get called "Nazi" a lot you might want to ask yourself what opinions you are expressing that might strike people as being "Nazi?" They are calling you a "Nazi," not a "Commie," a "Pinko," a "Zionist," or a "Race Traitor." Why is that, do you suppose?


The same people that are using Nazi, are using it because deplorable, racist, Zionist, race traitor, didn't work! So yeah, considering the source? Not too concerned.




posted on Jun, 26 2018 @ 10:29 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

They use that one because it resonates with folks. ...and the others didn't stick. Thing is too many on both ends are beginning to run out of things to call each other. I wonder what comes next.

Not sure I want to know.



posted on Jun, 27 2018 @ 09:27 PM
link   
In the political world, calling someone a "racist" is like what calling them a "poo poo head" was in kindergarten.

It's the meanest name. And it's an accusation that can be thrown around carelessly, with no need for evidence to back it up, because it amounts to speculating about someone's state of mind. No libel suits.

People will believe it if they don't trust Trump, and get upset about it if they do trust him. Which gives the press exactly what it needs: a controversy. That stuff is their bread and butter.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 05:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: DBCowboy

If you get called "Nazi" a lot you might want to ask yourself what opinions you are expressing that might strike people as being "Nazi?" They are calling you a "Nazi," not a "Commie," a "Pinko," a "Zionist," or a "Race Traitor." Why is that, do you suppose?


The same people that are using Nazi, are using it because deplorable, racist, Zionist, race traitor, didn't work! So yeah, considering the source? Not too concerned.



Wow. You just don't get it, do you? Why don't they just call you "faggot?"
edit on 28-6-2018 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
63
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join