It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Obama White House’s chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a “back burner” after he was ordered to “stand down” his efforts in the summer of 2016.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Sounds like an Epic Administrative Failure 😎
and/or the ultimate "Choke and Gag" 😎
⚖
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Report here. This is also all over Twitter.
The Obama White House’s chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a “back burner” after he was ordered to “stand down” his efforts in the summer of 2016.
You know, many of us on ATS and elsewhere have wondered how the DNC could refuse to allow the FBI to examine their server, and get away with it. Wanna bet the FBI was ordered to stand down as well?
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Report here. This is also all over Twitter.
The Obama White House’s chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a “back burner” after he was ordered to “stand down” his efforts in the summer of 2016.
You know, many of us on ATS and elsewhere have wondered how the DNC could refuse to allow the FBI to examine their server, and get away with it. Wanna bet the FBI was ordered to stand down as well?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Report here. This is also all over Twitter.
The Obama White House’s chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a “back burner” after he was ordered to “stand down” his efforts in the summer of 2016.
You know, many of us on ATS and elsewhere have wondered how the DNC could refuse to allow the FBI to examine their server, and get away with it. Wanna bet the FBI was ordered to stand down as well?
The other possibility is they needed a Russian narrative against Trump and decided to use the chaos inaction created to blame Trump while concealing the coup in the Russia mess. Also didnt Brennen and company start visiting London around the same time?
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: Butterfinger
Apparently that flexibility included bending over backwards to let Russia play with our election
I get the feeling that Russian agents were playing both sides of the aisle...
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
I get the feeling that Russian agents were playing both sides of the aisle...
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: ThanosOrder
Why would they need to do that? They have a nuclear triad of their own.
Besides, the launch codes only authenticate a person authorized to order the launch. Physical soldiers (with multiple fail-safes) have to actually fire the weapons. I believe that code is changed frequently (daily?)