It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Did you see my post where I said that there ARE jobs in Mexico???? In all the same areas they work in in the US. Why promote a flood of massive migration when they could fix the problems of their own country? Where is Mexico's culpability here? Or El Salvador or where ever.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
So how would that work? millions of people pouring into the US and getting jobs and paying taxes..... oh wait, I think I heard Tucker Carlson mention the remittances that Mexico relies on from their nationals in the US.....
Take income taxes out of their paychecks. It would work exactly the same way it works for anyone who legally lives in the US now.
Ive just told you that the Mexican government wants massive migration into the US so that they can receive remittances from those people. It is naïve to believe that they really want US citizenship. And the Democrat Party just wants voters so they can continue to push their socialist utopia. The Democrat Party is owned and backed by Soros and his billions of dollars in the OSI.
See my edit, you edited your post while I was responding.
The fact is that Obama's policies enabled child trafficking and drug trafficking too.
You are obviously painfully unaware that the reality is this is what we can expect....
We, as we say all the time, are very pro-immigration. But what Sr. Obrador, a classic lefty Latin crony capitalist if there ever was one (though, surprise, he’s selling himself as an enemy of crony capitalism this go ’round), is suggesting here is an overt hostile act. But has just the bare patina of “humanitarianism”. Enough for the soft heads and the fellow travelers.hpub.org...
From The Daily Caller) Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) called for mass immigration to the United States during a speech Thursday, declaring it a “human right” for all North Americans.
“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in the United States.”
He then declared it as “a human right we will defend,” eluniversal.com reports.
So what do you think about that? Do you think its really good for the US? Or for this type of thing to happen in other countries? Soros has promoted this in other countries. And his motive is not pure, as I have posted his own words already, he wants to rule the globe himself.
Why should a nation have to fix their own problems? Why are you so opposed to the idea of people flocking to a nation where those problems don't exist?
originally posted by: Xenogears
And liberal states go about putting sanctuaries, giving them welfare, and discretly allowing them and their children to vote.
While our population and high iq individuals reproduce little, millions upon millions of low iq migrants given the promise of welfare and sanctuaries start pouring in replacing the population.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
How about some xo action stating only citizens can have welfare?
Oh that does not serve the plan the admin has i suppose.
originally posted by: Xenogears
Have you not seen the increase in violent crime from migrants in places like germany? They bring their hell here, know it, and understand it. Moving them from one location to another won't change their capabilities or culture.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Xenogears
And liberal states go about putting sanctuaries, giving them welfare, and discretly allowing them and their children to vote.
I don't see a problem with any of these things. Welfare only benefits society, sanctuary is nothing more than not prosecuting people over illegal immigration, which this proposal would eliminate anyways, and I don't think voting should be limited to citizens, only to residents.
While our population and high iq individuals reproduce little, millions upon millions of low iq migrants given the promise of welfare and sanctuaries start pouring in replacing the population.
While I don't agree with the high/low IQ point in the first place, why wouldn't high IQ people come here too? A system that enables anyone to succeed at a high quality of life is going to be very attractive to people with talent, of any intelligence level.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Xenogears
Have you not seen the increase in violent crime from migrants in places like germany? They bring their hell here, know it, and understand it. Moving them from one location to another won't change their capabilities or culture.
Since Germany opened their borders, the crime rate has dropped. Any source that says otherwise is lying to you.
www.reuters.com...
www.dw.com...
www.independent.co.uk...
The report used statistics from Lower Saxony - regarded as an average state - where police saw an increase of 10.4% in reported violent crimes in 2015 and 2016. Based on figures from the state's interior ministry, which keeps a separate record of alleged crimes by migrants, the report suggested that 92.1% of this increase was attributable to migrants.
bbc
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: trustmeimdoctor
I think we shouldn't detain anyone. It's a waste of money. Just boot them back across the border no matter if they want asylum or not. It's not our problem.
I am starting to think that if we are gonna detain anyone it should be violent offenders.
Actually i have always thought that but the feds keep conflating the ones who need to be stopped because of real criminality with those seeking asylum
the federal laws are too contrived to function in an effectual manner any longer.
STATES RIGHTS will fix this
and per the Constitution immigration and federal sovereignty at a border is reserved solely to the federal government and not the state.
States have no rights in this area.
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
How about some xo action stating only citizens can have welfare?
Oh that does not serve the plan the admin has i suppose.
Because it would be challenged, and liberal judges would block it for years.
Besides we do not want to become mexico. Understand enough mexicans come here, and this becomes a new mexico. Generation after generation the gang members and corrupt politicians die, only to be replaced by new ones. They will bring that here.
Where is your White Paper on the benefits of massive migration and how your proposal would eliminate the problem? It sounds a bit anecdotal rather than based on real numbers and statistics. We have seen the level of crime that comes with people living in tent housing and such. Or how about those refugees who had nice paid for apartment housing and phones and the like and they trashed it completely. People tend to not appreciate stuff that's been given to them free of charge. Its a fallacy that if you give free stuff people will magically be good and productive.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Xenogears
And liberal states go about putting sanctuaries, giving them welfare, and discretly allowing them and their children to vote.
I don't see a problem with any of these things. Welfare only benefits society, sanctuary is nothing more than not prosecuting people over illegal immigration, which this proposal would eliminate anyways, and I don't think voting should be limited to citizens, only to residents.
While our population and high iq individuals reproduce little, millions upon millions of low iq migrants given the promise of welfare and sanctuaries start pouring in replacing the population.
While I don't agree with the high/low IQ point in the first place, why wouldn't high IQ people come here too? A system that enables anyone to succeed at a high quality of life is going to be very attractive to people with talent, of any intelligence level.
How do you know it is not the MSM lying? Merkel is likely an Elitist globalist anyway. She is going to promote what is best for the One World Government. How could she say that crime is down in the face of the raping going on there? Its been in the news..... perhaps she meant that its gone down a bit since the initial surge. That must be comforting.
Since Germany opened their borders, the crime rate has dropped. Any source that says otherwise is lying to you.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
so says the person who claimed that after crossing border with adult a child then separated by officials then becomes unaccompanied.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
The days of bending the constitution to your will are over.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
We got it wrong long ago and it will be resolved without your help if that is what it takes.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
Selective interpretation is not healthy.......
“If for the arrogant President Macron this is not a problem, we invite him to stop insulting and to show instead some concrete generosity by opening up France’s many ports and letting children, men and women through at Ventimiglia,” he said in a statement, referring to the northeastern Italian town at the border with France.
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: Aazadan
How do you know it is not the MSM lying? Merkel is likely an Elitist globalist anyway. She is going to promote what is best for the One World Government. How could she say that crime is down in the face of the raping going on there? Its been in the news..... perhaps she meant that its gone down a bit since the initial surge. That must be comforting.
Since Germany opened their borders, the crime rate has dropped. Any source that says otherwise is lying to you.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Xenogears
And liberal states go about putting sanctuaries, giving them welfare, and discretly allowing them and their children to vote.
I don't see a problem with any of these things. Welfare only benefits society, sanctuary is nothing more than not prosecuting people over illegal immigration, which this proposal would eliminate anyways, and I don't think voting should be limited to citizens, only to residents.
While our population and high iq individuals reproduce little, millions upon millions of low iq migrants given the promise of welfare and sanctuaries start pouring in replacing the population.
While I don't agree with the high/low IQ point in the first place, why wouldn't high IQ people come here too? A system that enables anyone to succeed at a high quality of life is going to be very attractive to people with talent, of any intelligence level.
www.frontpagemag.com...
The EU must take in "at least a million asylum-seekers annually for the foreseeable future" and ante up €15,000, or US$16,800, for each "asylum-seeker for each of the first two years to help cover housing, health care, and education costs – and to make accepting refugees more appealing to member states."
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: Aazadan
How do you know it is not the MSM lying? Merkel is likely an Elitist globalist anyway. She is going to promote what is best for the One World Government. How could she say that crime is down in the face of the raping going on there? Its been in the news..... perhaps she meant that its gone down a bit since the initial surge. That must be comforting.
Since Germany opened their borders, the crime rate has dropped. Any source that says otherwise is lying to you.
Because the only people who believe the nonsense about migrant crime are the same people who believe in nonsense like a massive conspiracy between news agencies in order to somehow promote a one world government headed by Soros.
www.frontpagemag.com...
Soros makes little effort to conceal his contempt for this nation. He openly favors the collapse of the greenback and the decline of America in general. “The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States,” he has said. Soros praises Red China effusively and has said the totalitarian nation—which cuts babies in unauthorized pregnancies from the wombs of their mothers, tortures and kills religious dissenters such as Falun Gong members,
originally posted by: howtonhawky
the powers of the federal gov. are enumerated
do you understand that if the power was not enumerated then it belongs to the state
originally posted by: howtonhawky
i do not expect you to accept that though cause it would quail your jack booted desires to give any power back to the states
instead you will lump together several previous unconstitutional rulings in order to garner your interpretation
originally posted by: howtonhawky
it is clear that the feds can not get it right
originally posted by: howtonhawky
they were givin power to naturalize people and they can not even get that right
originally posted by: howtonhawky
by allmeans you seem like you want to continue with the failed system or just round up every one you can and deport them
originally posted by: howtonhawky
that divides the country by way of civil war
is that your desire?
if not then take a deep breath and go back to the first time the states gave away there power and let's take it back.
also you can not stop what is coming from cali without civil war
it would be much easier to adhere to the constitution and get back to states rights!