It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI may have modified witness reports, misled DOJ watchdog with 'false information,' GOP Rep says

page: 1
20
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+1 more 
posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:27 PM
link   

Horowitz said later he has additional information suggesting that the witness reports were changed after-the-fact in both the Clinton and Russia probes -- a particularly alarming possibility given the IG report's findings of bias in those investigations.

www.foxnews.com...

So there is evidence the FBI was lying, altering witness statements in an attempt to hurt Trump.
edit on 20-6-2018 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Seems like things are moving faster now..

I wonder who's going to jail first.

I'll bet Strzok.


edit on 20/6/2018 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Where and when did Horowitz say this?



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou

Why? What crime did he commit. You're outta ya mind as they say.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Don't worry, Silly.

Haven't you heard?

It's a nothinburger.




posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:37 PM
link   
bring them down already PRISON SENTENCES



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


Like the Immigration decisions made by Trump's Attorney General, the DOJ/FBI actions taken to hurt Donald Trump, were approved at the very top, by President Obama.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Read the source.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

More FBI agent comments ...


“I am numb," one wrote on Election Day. “Viva le resistance,” the lawyer wrote later, in response to what he would do now that Trump had won.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Sillyolme

Read the source.


Why do that.

She lives in a world of preconceived notions.

Tragic...



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I forgot, it's a nothingburger.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:46 PM
link   
a reply to: whyamIhere

Basically it's so shocking they can't believe it's true. Once proven it goes from too incredulous to he true to a meh who cares.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


So there is evidence the FBI was lying, altering witness statements in an attempt to hurt Trump.


Wow, you picked up what water carrier Meadows laid down and ran with it. Here's what Meadows said:


"The other thing that I would ask you to look into, there is growing evidence that 302s were edited and changed,” Meadows told Horowitz. “Those 302s, it is suggested that they were changed to either prosecute or not prosecute individuals. And that is very troubling.”


What "growing evidence" is there that 302s were edited to "either prosecute or not prosecute individuals?" Rumors published by Sara Carter back in January?



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Wow I read the article. You should try.


Horowitz suggested that the IG is reviewing information concerning modified 302s, saying his office intended to "follow up" on the matter.


Apparently there is something there since it's officially being looked at.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 01:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian

What "growing evidence" is there that 302s were edited to "either prosecute or not prosecute individuals?" Rumors published by Sara Carter back in January?


Hard to say since the FBI & DOJ keep trying to hide their malfeasance & corruption behind, ahem, "national security."

There wasn't, according to the resistance crew, anything wonky about McCabe either. Except there was.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


Basically it's so shocking they can't believe it's true. Once proven it goes from too incredulous to he true to a meh who cares.


Yeah, that's it. Top of the front page of ATS right now: TWO FBI Agents Murdered One Day Before Testifying Against Hillary Clinton!.

A complete fabrication from Neon Nettle, the people who brought you "evidence of the Queen shape shifting goes viral!" "Tony Podesta Arrested! Warrants issued for Hillary Clinton and John Podesta!" and yesterday's "Leaked Image of Barack Obama Dressed as Satan Goes Viral."

Let's get real here. You're part of a peer group that should be last throwing stones given the fact that many of them cannot stop themselves from believing absolutely any absurd thing that they want to be true, regardless of the lack of evidence and no matter how ridiculous they are on their faces.

Mark Meadows talks a lot of #, mostly just regurgitated talking points from the pro-Trump echo chamber. If he's got evidence, let's hear it.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

I think you are confused here. The OP didn't write the article, he posted it here and we all get to read it. If you are angry at how it was written or what it says, I think you might want to direct your anger at those people.



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Sillyolme

Don't worry, Silly.

Haven't you heard?

It's a nothinburger.



funny that isnt it. there were literally members in this community saying that not even 5 minutes after the report was made public claiming to have read the executive summary, and that we should all just move along and there was nothing to see here........seems they were premature



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 01:20 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


Apparently there is something there since it's officially being looked at.


You mean like the Trump campaign colluding with the Russian government?

How exactly did Horowitz "suggest" it? Why didn't the writer just quote what Horowitz said in response instead of a characterization of his response? Whenever you get a characterization and a two-word quote, that should be a red flag.

I'm going to help you out and tell you what he said. (source)


“If I could just mention, we have been getting those kind of referrals and as often happens when we issue reports like this we get other information coming to us, and we are intending to follow up on that,” Horowitz said.


They're looking into it because they were asked to look into just like how Meadows was asking them to look into it. You made an assumption based on a lack of information or should say, a deliberate omission of information intended to create a hole for your imagination to fill.
edit on 2018-6-20 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2018 @ 01:21 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Y'all keep saying nothing there and sticking up for a corrupt 7th Floor but the evidence keeps increasing:

Comey insubordinate leaker with double standards.

McCabe lying leaker.

Strzok biased double standards reassigned before recently being escorted out of the building.

Not to mention Page, Baker, both Ohrs, Kortan, etc. ad infinitum. Soon to be Rosenstein I betcha.

That's just scratching the surface of ever-increasing revelations. Obviously not a witch hunt either. All based on facts and solid evidence. Get a grip and come into the light.


edit on 20-6-2018 by The GUT because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
20
<<   2 >>

log in

join