It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cynicalheathen
I'm fine not getting any social security / medicare benefits, and would let them keep what I've paid in over the last 20 years if I can stop paying.
I'm pointing out the half assed, ultra-biased article
There's nothing half-assed or biased about it except your misleading, idiotic, one sided joke of a critique.
This is a declaration of war against most Americans, make no mistake about it. without Social Security most people will never be able to retire, which is tyranny in itself, but that also means they will keep working which means fewer jobs for younger people. and with huge cuts in medical benefits and getting rid of restrictions on not covering people with health conditions it it will bankrupt and probably kill hundreds of thousands of people.
But we should destroy our country because some 20 year old ass@oles think it's cool.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: CB328
Hang on... how are they going to fund the Space Force? Cut Education? Yes, that would make sense.
originally posted by: CB328. without Social Security most people will never be able to retire,
originally posted by: CB328
The absolute worst, possible things the Republicans could imagine doing short of starting WWIII. I called this months ago when Ryan said he was retiring, they wanted to stop him from advertising this plan and save it for after the midterms. I guess looking on the bright side of enough voters hear about this the GOP purge will be so big they may never recover. I consider this an act of war against the 99% of Americans who aren't millionaires.
House GOP plan would cut Medicare, Social Security to balance budget
www.washingtonpost.com... =.e8ea179777cb
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: CB328
Hang on... how are they going to fund the Space Force? Cut Education? Yes, that would make sense.
Other countries spend less on education and get far more out of it. But we can't even begin to think about improving the DOE without a hyperbolic knee-jerk like this.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Is this the old wordplay where not increasing Soc Sec by a certain amount is considered a "cut"? Example soc sec supposed to increase by 1 billion and now it will only increase by 500 million so they call it a 500 million cut?
I don't think lowering the debt is what the repub are really concerned about.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DJW001
When you have a rational argument, I would be more than happy to respond.
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: CB328
Hang on... how are they going to fund the Space Force? Cut Education? Yes, that would make sense.
Other countries spend less on education and get far more out of it. But we can't even begin to think about improving the DOE without a hyperbolic knee-jerk like this.