FBI Agent Peter Strzok escorted out of FBI headquarters today

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: six67seven

So you're for allowing political bias to affect policy when the political bias matches your own beliefs?

Interesting.

I wouldn't expect you to 'get it' or understand.

So I won't bother with you.

Think whateeeeeeever you like.

You need to lower your expectations and drop the IQ a few, common sense and rational thinking is not allowed ya know.

www.zerohedge.com...

wow...

Paul Sperry

BREAKING: IG Horowitz now says he's no longer convinced the FBI was collecting all of Strzok's and Page's text messages EVEN OUTSIDE THE 5-MONTH BLACKOUT period when it archived none of the texts due to a technical "glitch." So a # of other Strzok responses to Page likely missing
3:41 PM - Jun 19, 2018

Paul Sperry @paulsperry_

Shooting down a Dem/MSM talking point, Horowitz testified, "We did NOT find no bias in regard to the October 2016 events." Strzok's choice to make pursuing the Russia espionage case a bigger priority than reopening the Clinton espionage case suggested "that was a BIASED decision"

If Strzok has information/evidence of crimes committed by others in this mess and is wanting to provide that info to "clear the air" and save himself I say no. Provide your info and we will look at reduced charges or prison time for you but the simple fact he might have this info and sat on it for his own self preservation just reinforces the fact he should not be employed by the FBI. The same goes for McCabe who was trying a back door method to get immunity from prosecution by trying to fool congress.


No deals for anyone.. investigate their crimes, charge them and then hang em all.

Everything above comes from the zerohedge source one post above.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Good Riddance.
I hope he is the leader
of a parade.

S&F

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: six67seven

So you're for allowing political bias to affect policy when the political bias matches your own beliefs?

Interesting.

I wouldn't expect you to 'get it' or understand.

So I won't bother with you.

Think whateeeeeeever you like.

You need to lower your expectations and drop the IQ a few, common sense and rational thinking is not allowed ya know.

It's so funny when you guys do this.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: six67seven

So you're for allowing political bias to affect policy when the political bias matches your own beliefs?

Interesting.

I wouldn't expect you to 'get it' or understand.

So I won't bother with you.

Think whateeeeeeever you like.

You need to lower your expectations and drop the IQ a few, common sense and rational thinking is not allowed ya know.

It's so funny when you guys do this.

Is it? It's the only way I've found to understand what some of you are trying to say.

a reply to: Xcathdra

“Despite being put through a highly questionable process, Pete has complied with every FBI procedure...”

So they are saying that FBI procedures are highly questionable. Funny they never mentioned this until ol’ Pete has to go through it. This letter is a piss poor attempt at spin and deflection.

pics or it didn't happen.

Why? How is it possible there is no video?
Or MSM coverage.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
pics or it didn't happen.

Why? How is it possible there is no video?
Or MSM coverage.

Except for CNN article in the op and the statement released by Strzoks attorney.

Pull your head out of the sand and you might see it.

As for why the IG laid it out in the report and during the hearings today destroyed the Democrats talking point when he noted their was bias in the Clinton investigation. Namely Strzok and how he railroaded the Clinton investigation to go after Trump to ensure Clinton won.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
pics or it didn't happen.

Why? How is it possible there is no video?
Or MSM coverage.

Oh my.
Why would Strzok be fired? Maybe you should read through a few recent threads, including the Congressional hearing threads.

hmm. Now whyyyy would the MSM not cover everything going on right now, including Strzok? Let's see...
Maybe because it shows that the Clinton investigation was corrupt?
Maybe because it shows that the Russia investigation IS a witch hunt?

But.. your trusted MSM DID cover it:
FBI agent Strzok escorted from FBI building Friday
FBI agent Peter Strzok escorted from agency amid disciplinary proceedings

Embattled agent Peter Strzok escorted from FBI headquarters
Peter Strzok escorted out of FBI building

LOL, dear Silly. I know it's hard to accept

As was discussed in the Oversight hearing - it is unprecedented for so many top level FBI employees to be fired, demoted and forced to resign within such a short period. And they are all tied to these high level investigations. They even mentioned a couple that are not publicized.

I believe there is much going on that the public is not aware of, and the FBI is in turmoil. Their reputation is shattered by these few who abused their power. I predict many appeals pending.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
pics or it didn't happen.

Why? How is it possible there is no video?
Or MSM coverage.

Interesting approach

What a load of crap..

.. this guy doesn't exist!

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: Arnie123

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
Peter got escorted ...Is Stormy still working the streets of Washington ? Lisa is probably pissed and probably willing to flip ..or flop . Competitions is tough Lisa maybe a flip/flop will work

flip flop tick tock

Thank god that whole stormy daniels thing is done with, some BS right there.

That was 15 minutes we'll never get back!

Stormy...? more like a drizzle.

Correction...more like a "dribble"

There, I fixed it for ya.

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: six67seven

So you're for allowing political bias to affect policy when the political bias matches your own beliefs?

Interesting.

I wouldn't expect you to 'get it' or understand.

So I won't bother with you.

Think whateeeeeeever you like.

You need to lower your expectations and drop the IQ a few, common sense and rational thinking is not allowed ya know.

It's so funny when you guys do this.

Is it? It's the only way I've found to understand what some of you are trying to say.

It's hilarious to me. Some of you can't conceive that anyone disagrees with your interpretation so they must be (stupid, irrational, illiterate) etc. And this is repeated in every response in every thread, even when it is obvious that the person you're talking about isn't (stupid, irrational, illiterate). It's a failed tactic that some can't let go.

a reply to: Xcathdra

A notation of bias on the part of a member of an investigation is not a biased investigation.

Did Horowitz say that the Clinton Investigation was corrupted? Because what I heard him say over and over was that the decision not to prosecute was made by individuals that had shown no political bias.

Strzok showed bias in the text messages. Honestly, who has ever questioned that?

Your description that Strzok "railroaded the Clinton investigation to go after Trump" doesn't even make logical sense.

a reply to: BlueAjah

The FBI is only in turmoil because Republicans in Congress a) can't let investigating Clinton go and b) they are trying DESPERATELY to muddy the waters regarding any wrongdoing on the part of Trump and his campaign.

a reply to: BlueAjah

It's fairly obvious that Strzok was removed (and likely terminated from employment) at the demand of Congress since the facts of his many procedural errors have been known for months. Or the FBI was waiting for the findings established in the IG report.

Further, he deserved to be fired. He obviously let his personal bias overcome his professional judgement.

I'm sure we're going to see something similar in the New York Field Office (because of anti-Clinton bias and leaks.)

In my opinion, this attempt to discredit the entire FBI is not only wrongheaded but borders on ... other crimes.

a reply to: shooterbrody



Or thereabouts.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Bias in the Clinton investigation affected the direction the investigation took and affected decisions made.

Not sure how to make it any more simple man. Bias was present and it affected the investigation. 302's were altered in Clinton AND the russia investigation. Eveidence was hidden from Congress.