It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI Agent Peter Strzok escorted out of FBI headquarters today

page: 3
56
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: sligtlyskeptical

In some minds one is either against Clinton or for her.

They've forgotten that one can be for the truth regardless of who the truth regards.

Except ... not any longer.

Investigators now are supposed to exist in some sort of vacuum in which they don't have opinions.

Folks aren't thinking this issue through.




posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: six67seven

So you're for allowing political bias to affect policy when the political bias matches your own beliefs?

Interesting.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: sligtlyskeptical

Except when you've been paying attention, you know Strozk created the draft that removed the "gross negligence" phrasing and Comey approved it, and your narrative quickly falls apart.


And after he did that, Strzok proclaimed,

"The White House is Running This."



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




What would you like to see Mr. Strzok prosecuted for?
That would be determined after the investigation into him . He's not a newbie and has a history . Looking very close ate his past work is in order to find out what crime or crimes he may have committed .



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

It didn't begin with Clinton.

The GW Bush Administration used private email servers and "lost" 22 million emails.

Alberto Gonzales, Bush's AG ... took classified reports home without proper security measures (as noted in the IG report).

I'll put more faith in these calls for justice when it's justice for all!



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: six67seven

So you're for allowing political bias to affect policy when the political bias matches your own beliefs?

Interesting.


I wouldn't expect you to 'get it' or understand.

So I won't bother with you.

Think whateeeeeeever you like.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: Gryphon66




What would you like to see Mr. Strzok prosecuted for?
That would be determined after the investigation into him . He's not a newbie and has a history . Looking very close ate his past work is in order to find out what crime or crimes he may have committed .


Nah, the person I directed the question to wanted to see it done NOW.

Your answer is interesting though ... you don't care what he's charged with as long as he's found guilty of something??

LOL.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
With all the revelations in the IG Report combined with new info from the Congressional hearings Mon and Tue, it's no wonder he should not be allowed "on the property".



The Congressional Oversight Hearing today was exceptionally interesting. The Democrats knew they lost the battle. You can tell when every one of them started attempting to deflect with "but... the children". They were not getting the answers they wanted, so they just wasted their time and distracted.

Actually, I am starting to believe that the uproar about immigrant children was manufactured as a diversion from the IG report.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: RadioRobert

It didn't begin with Clinton.

The GW Bush Administration used private email servers and "lost" 22 million emails.

Alberto Gonzales, Bush's AG ... took classified reports home without proper security measures (as noted in the IG report).

I'll put more faith in these calls for justice when it's justice for all!


I was irritated by that, too. More so by the missing emails than Gonzales, but Gonzales should have known better, too. Some one should have paid the piper for the Bush mess. The Bush incident led to new laws and regs on government business on private servers and retention, btw, which should have ended the Clinton fiasco before it started.
edit on 19-6-2018 by RadioRobert because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: six67seven

So you're for allowing political bias to affect policy when the political bias matches your own beliefs?

Interesting.


I wouldn't expect you to 'get it' or understand.

So I won't bother with you.

Think whateeeeeeever you like.


Aww ... aren't you gracious! I can has my own opinion?

Gee.

You're ABSOLUTELY right though ... I dont' "get it."

I don't get how none of you can see that accusing Federal (or State or local) agents and LEOs based on their political beliefs when there is NO EVIDENCE OF bad action on an investigation, NO EVIDENCE of mishandling (and the IG just spent 18 months investigating this) isn't going to fracture and undermine the our LEGAL SYSTEM.

All this to cover for one fat, old conman.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

Moreover ... if Clinton is guilty, Gonzales is guilty ... and if they are guilty so is GWBush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powel, Rice and a dozen others.


+8 more 
posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:25 PM
link   
Silly??!!! Where are you?

Strzok is F.I.R.E.D!!

Can we use the word now?



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Nickn3

You mean there's folks who still do?



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




you don't care what he's charged with as long as he's found guilty of something??
Makes no difference to me but I would hope that it would be sufficient enough for a prosecutor to convict . I see Muller is still looking into ...you know and is still short of his target . Maybe Peets situation will be much quicker .



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
CNN has a story .... They have their "sources"

FBI agent Strzok escorted from FBI building Friday

😲💥


You know the sheesh hitted the fan when even the top MSM FAKE NEWS of all can’t just ignore or deflect the story.

About time! Now let me see some arrests!

Drain all swamp!

No matter whose side it is.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: RadioRobert

Moreover ... if Clinton is guilty, Gonzales is guilty ... and if they are guilty so is GWBush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powel, Rice and a dozen others.



Actually, no, they are not completely analogous. Gonzales, for example, didn't store his information where foreign actors got a hold of it. He was still negligent. Perhaps even grossly so, and I wouldn't care if he was prosecuted. The Bush incident(s) were clearly done to avoid preservation of record laws. But the guidelines and laws covering the use of private servers did not exist at that time. Private server use was legally hazy at that time, which led to new regulations existing for Clinton's scenario and not the Bush scenario. However, as I noted above, someone should have been held to account for that nonsense, too.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:33 PM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

I'd be concerned about raising too much ire when the statute of limitations on the charge may be expired. As well as, as you mentioned, predate the laws created for the new technology platforms.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:33 PM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

The statute doesn't regard access ... Gonzales didn't keep it in the required safe storage at his home.

There weren't laws that prevented classified materials from being exposed in Bushes Adminstration?

I'm not sure how I see that these are disparate ... the issue is mishandling classified material, not how you do it, yes?



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: RadioRobert

I'd be concerned about raising too much ire when the statute of limitations on the charge may be expired. As well as, as you mentioned, predate the laws created for the new technology platforms.


Distract, deflect, is quickly becoming the only tool that hasn't broken in their hands or fallen out of the tool box.



posted on Jun, 19 2018 @ 05:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: RadioRobert

The statute doesn't regard access ... Gonzales didn't keep it in the required safe storage at his home.

There weren't laws that prevented classified materials from being exposed in Bushes Adminstration?

I'm not sure how I see that these are disparate ... the issue is mishandling classified material, not how you do it, yes?


Were it up to me, Weinberger would have been flogged in town square for his nonsense. I can't believe no one did anything about any of that crap.







 
56
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join