Listen to children who’ve just been separated from their parents at the border

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: pavil

So you’re blaming Obama for what goes on in Central America?


Does that make a lot of sense?

What had he done to make it so people wouldn't send their children with very bad people to try and sneak into America?
You do remember the 2014 wave of Unaccompained Minors, right?

You were outraged back then right?

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Willtell

"Her husband" agrees with her.

This is not a Trump policy. This is the law. This law was in place before Trump became President.
If Congress changes the law, then things will get better. Trump wants Congress to act. He does not like the situation either.

That is a lie

THIS IS NOT THE LAW!

Trump doesn't have to do this.

It could be stopped with one phone call from him

what the hell is wrong with you?

originally posted by: RowanBean

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: RowanBean

Bleeding heart BS is what Liberals resort to when they have no argument,

Round round round here we go again. Left. Right. Left. Right. No U. No U. NO U!

The game is getting boring.

What is your solution to our Immigration issues then?

I'm being serious. What things would you do.

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: RowanBean

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: RowanBean

Bleeding heart BS is what Liberals resort to when they have no argument,

Round round round here we go again. Left. Right. Left. Right. No U. No U. NO U!

The game is getting boring.

What is your solution to our Immigration issues then?

I'm being serious. What things would you do.

I've always stated that we should end the war on drugs. That would reduce immigration so much.

a reply to: Willtell

Repeat after me:

"illegal criminals attempting to penetrate US borders have no rights under the constitution"
"illegal criminals attempting to penetrate US borders have no rights under the constitution"
"illegal criminals attempting to penetrate US borders have no rights under the constitution"
"illegal criminals attempting to penetrate US borders have no rights under the constitution"
"illegal criminals attempting to penetrate US borders have no rights under the constitution"

No-one wants to see children separated from their parents.

Below is a breakdown of most responsible through to least responsible for adults being separated from their children illegally attempting to penetrate the US border....because facts are important:

1. The illegal criminal 'parents' who know the law but break it anyway, hoping CNN will set them free.
2. All US government administrations and POTUS's pre Nov 9th 2016 for shirking US immigration law.
3. The hypocrites who either remained silent during Bush/Obama years or simply turned a blind eye to Obamas child cages because 'neo-liberal progressivism''
4. US lawmakers for allowing 'asylum' to be treated like a $20 hooker - open for a free-for-all, the more money the easier.
5. The MSM for their selective faux outrage, and consequential *crickets* once proven Obamas conduct was 50x worse.
6. All US citizens who find the Constitution inconvenient when it destroys progressive ideologies.

The solution would be to have a 'neutral zone' on the Mexico side of the border so that all adults are warned, in advance, that if they proceed to the zone with their children, and they do so illegally by circumventing the legal immigration/asylum process, their children will not be imprisoned, but the parents will.

Personal responsibility - liberal progressivism hates it, big daddy borderless super government will take care of everything.

2+2=5.

Ignorance is strength, war is peace...as so on and so forth.

originally posted by: RowanBean

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: RowanBean

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: RowanBean

Bleeding heart BS is what Liberals resort to when they have no argument,

Round round round here we go again. Left. Right. Left. Right. No U. No U. NO U!

The game is getting boring.

What is your solution to our Immigration issues then?

I'm being serious. What things would you do.

I've always stated that we should end the war on drugs. That would reduce immigration so much.

Elaborate.

You'd still have the Gangs in those countries. It's sad that much of Central America seems lost and destined to stay 3rd or 4th World forever.

If only they had Oil like Venezuela.

Central America, like Africa, needs a Marshall Plan.

Who is willing to pay for that?

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Willtell

"Her husband" agrees with her.

This is not a Trump policy. This is the law. This law was in place before Trump became President.
If Congress changes the law, then things will get better. Trump wants Congress to act. He does not like the situation either.

I guess if you don't know anything, you just make # up, then?
This is completely false.

Pathetic.

a reply to: pavil

Sure they will still have gangs. I'm talking about drug cartels. Ending war on drugs would cut their supply 100%, destroying their enterprises and their terrorizing of families and forcing them to be mules. Nixon and Reagan started this and the CIA was involved in the drug trafficking.

a reply to: Sublimecraft

You're ignorant

And don’t know what you're talking about …YOUR WRONG

THEY DO HAVE RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.

That’s why they have trials, for instance, its called DUE PROCESS

They don’t have the same rights that citizens do but they do have rights

Unlike the barbarian Trump, the founders weren’t barbarians

Only Trump and his followers are barbaric enough to convict people without trials
go back to school and learn something

Meh, all this junk doesn't have anything to do with any of it anyway. Safe country, BS. It's all Bull#.

As far as Trump and Sessions are concerned, it's about one thing.

Racism. And that is the long and the short of it.

Read my lips. RACISM.

a reply to: angeldoll

Amazing, these people are ignorant.

There arguing out of sheer ignorance.


I guess We're wasting our time

a reply to: Willtell

Trump, believe me, will do worse if they let him. He would commit genocide if he had the opportunity.

Do you honestly believe that? Truly? Where and when did a blowhard morph into genocidal maniac for you?

You may disagree with the man. Fine. It's a free country. Sort of. But to let disagreement turn someone else into a homicidal maniac has to be some kind of pathological reaction.

a reply to: RowanBean

The game you guys seem to play is attacking people on the left when they can't make a decent argument.

Do I really have to point this out to you?

Let me explain :

Mainstream news + children = Propaganda.

Really don't care about weeping kids when seen in MSM. MSM uses sentiment when it wants to push their agenda. Here in Europe we see weeping kids from immigrants , 'Nazi' italia hasn't let them in oh... horror.

You guys (Americans) are very lucky with a guy like Trump that's taking border security serious.

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Sublimecraft

You're ignorant

And don’t know what you're talking about …YOUR WRONG

THEY DO HAVE RIGHTS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.

That’s why they have trials, for instance, its called DUE PROCESS

They don’t have the same rights that citizens do but they do have rights

Unlike the barbarian Trump, the founders weren’t barbarians

Only Trump and his followers are barbaric enough to convict people without trials
go back to school and learn something

Absolutely, and as far as the children go, they are being summarily removed. Our laws state that children who have been summarily removed from their parents have a right to an attorney - Guardian ad Litem, and the entity who removed them MUST appear before a Judge within 72 hours to show probable cause, and if this is proven, temporary custody of the minor child is placed with the state, or another licensed entity.

We must give terrorists from other countries "a fair trial" and due process, but not minor children?
We've completely stripped them of their rights.

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: angeldoll

Amazing, these people are ignorant.

There arguing out of sheer ignorance.


I guess We're wasting our time

You recon? lol. Sweetie, it's a fact.
nighty night.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: RowanBean

The game you guys seem to play is attacking people on the left when they can't make a decent argument.

Do I really have to point this out to you?

What is your point of quoting my post?

a reply to: frenchfries

Mainstream news + children = Propaganda.

Its objective reality, not propaganda.

So, for example, if a mass killer kills a bunch of kids (which btw happens often in America nowadays) to report on it and put it forefront in the news is propaganda?

Logical?

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: angeldoll

Amazing, these people are ignorant.

There arguing out of sheer ignorance.


I guess We're wasting our time

You recon? lol. Sweetie, it's a fact.
nighty night.

good night

like shooting ducks!

a reply to: Willtell

Yea, your calls of racism and hitler are in line with a logical argument and based in fact.


Good god you folks haven't a clue.