It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: toms54
originally posted by: MetalThunder
a reply to: Krazysh0t
An alternative is to take the names/ information from the "Asylum seekers" then take them and their kids and turn them back to Mexico to await processing of said information.
Lets see what facilities the Mexicans build to house the parents and children.
After All most are trying to escape countries south of Mexico - so Mexico to them should be head and heels better to stay in then the country they fled.
Once approved let the families in.
But we are not allowed to deport them. When they seek asylum they are supposed to be in mortal danger. Sending them back would cause their death (theoretically.)
I think an answer would be to inject them with a pet chip that has GPS so we can locate them. We would have to put it somewhere they couldn't easily remove it. Like into their brain.
originally posted by: underwerks
You know, Trump could stop this at once if he wanted to.
Which means he doesn’t want to.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks
Why should Trump adopt your open border policy?
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks
Why should Trump adopt your open border policy?
Why do you keep calling it an open border policy when it isn’t? If you have to invent parts of your argument for it to be argument, it isn’t really an argument.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks
Why should Trump adopt your open border policy?
Why do you keep calling it an open border policy when it isn’t? If you have to invent parts of your argument for it to be argument, it isn’t really an argument.
If you want to allow unfettered access by anyone with no punishment as a result, then it is open borders.
Be honest at least.
Jeez!
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: network dude
obama had a massive amount of unaccompanied minors coming across the border... those minors had no parental supervision to begin with.
that's quite a bit different than creating the bargaining chi.... or I mean unaccompanied minor by taking the parent out of the picture!!!
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: network dude
obama had a massive amount of unaccompanied minors coming across the border... those minors had no parental supervision to begin with.
that's quite a bit different than creating the bargaining chi.... or I mean unaccompanied minor by taking the parent out of the picture!!!
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks
Why should Trump adopt your open border policy?
Why do you keep calling it an open border policy when it isn’t? If you have to invent parts of your argument for it to be argument, it isn’t really an argument.
If you want to allow unfettered access by anyone with no punishment as a result, then it is open borders.
Be honest at least.
Jeez!
Read the posts you are responding to at least. Jeez.
Nowhere in anything I’ve typed have I pushed for open borders. ???
If your only argument is based on mischaracterizing what I say, then that pretty much says it all. Can’t really argue about this just using facts huh?
originally posted by: dawnstar
first I want to say....
the actual truth seems to have flown out the window and well, not all the stories are true, heck maybe none of them are completely true. but, I am hearing stories which I am sorry, are describing situations that quite frankly if a parent was doing this to their kid, their kid would wind up in a foster home and the parent would end up in jail for child abuse and neglect!!!
to leave a bunch of toddlers locked up together in cages, with no adult supervision, no one to change their diapers or to comfort them.. or with older kids who find themselves changing those diapers because there are no adults around doing it...
that is just criminal behavior, and if the stories are true... it's our own government that is the criminal here!
ya, in the US if you break the law, you MIGHT end up in jail and your kids MIGHT end up in foster homes... but in no time are those kids left with people who are banned from full filling the basic need of changing the kids diaper or interacting with them and trying to comfort them. and, I would like to point out that often times, judges will consider the kids when passing down sentences and when at all possible, will avoid sending both parents to jail for the sake of the children.
if our government has chosen to take custody of these kids, then they sure the heck better make sure that they have the staff in place capable of caring for these kids adequately.... by what I hear, I really get the impression that they haven't done that!!! it's my understanding that crossing the border illegally is more like a misdemeanor.... abusing and neglecting children in mass, well, that is a much more serious crime! either pay for the danged staff, or leave them with their parents, who by the way, probably wouldn't be charging you a cent to change their kid's diapers!!
sick sobs.... before hearing and reading about this, I was really hoping that the mueller investigation wouldn't find a reason to arrest and prosecute both jared and ivanka, ya know because of their kids...
now?? heck with it! if they have done illegal crap, show them no leniency... throw them in jail and let the kids stay with their grandma or whoever...