How does the IG report affect Mueller investgation?

a reply to: Justso

Foundation atrocities continue.

Ha ha. See what happens when you embrace every dumb conspiracy theory that comes down the pike?
Meanwhile back at the ranch...
Every thing he accused Clinton of, he is guilty of. It was projection to rival the Roxy in its hey day!

Twenty two indictments, guilty pleas, jail time.
VS
Nothing.

Who are you kidding?
Who is stupid enough to believe any of this?

a reply to: carewemust

No the majority want the investigation to continue.
You are totally wrong.
You're embarrassing yourself.

Stop mashing the reply button Karen...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

Conspiracy. Total bull#.

Really? Wanna take another swing at it?


* - Sessions: DOJ inspector general to probe FISA abuse allegations
* - BREAKING: Jeff Sessions Orders New Look Into Uranium One Criminal Investigation
* - Inspector general recommends criminal investigation of Andrew McCabe
* - The Inspector General's Report Criticizes James Comey. Here's What You Need to Know
* - IG investigating claims of a spy being placed into Trump campaign
* - IG has begun a review of aspects of the Russia investigation. His findings could land in 2020 amid the presidential race.
* - IG initiated in March a review of the F.B.I.’s surveillance of Carter Page


* - Senate Judiciary Demands DOJ And FBI Turn Over Flynn 302 Forms Due To Comey's Contradictory Statements


Rosenstein letter authorizing the SC - Section B

The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 27th. 2017, including....

a reply to: Xcathdra

Where's the beef honey?

Oh my i don't know whether to laugh or feel sorry for you.
The IG report is done. There is no more due on this.
Requests from trump sycophants in the house for further investigations doesn't mean they are going to do it. They can ask til the cows come home but it looks like trump doesn't own the IG. Or Jeff Sessions for that matter.

This investigation was only meant to affect the midterm elections, to turn public opinion about the direction the politics of Washington had taken in 2016.

The last grasp at retaining power back to the Party of no message, just "Get Trump"

Mueller dragging his feet coming to any conclusions, is meant to suggest that there is something to investigate. Suggestions are enough for those who lost.

All optics .... to satisfy the believers that the election was stolen .... A pacifier and final attempt to change the tide that is rolling thru Washington.

Mueller's conclusion will be disappointing, just like election night at the DNC.

What is important is to Vote this Fall ... Be Heard and make it count.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

No the majority want the investigation to continue.
You are totally wrong.
You're embarrassing yourself.

The problem is you ignore the fact Trump is not a target yet you keep claiming he is. So who is lying? You, Rosenstein or Mueller?

* - Rosenstein Tells Trump He’s Not a Target in Mueller, Cohen Probes
* - Mueller: Trump's not a target.

22 people indicted / plead guilty yet not one for anything linked to Trump nor Trump-Russia collusion
Everyone Mueller Has Charged in Russia Election Probe, All 22 of Them
* - Michael Flynn - False statements - currently under review by the federal judge. FBI cleared Flynn and currently the 302's submitted are under investigation for changes made at the insistence of McCabe and Sally Yates (acting AG at the time). Comey also got caught lying because he testified to Congress agents said Flynn was not lying to them. Talking to Russians during the transition is not illegal and had nothing to do with TRump Russia colusion.
* - Richard Pinedo - Identity Fraud
* - Alex van der Zwaan - lying to federal agents about a conversation with Gates regarding Ukraine.
* - Paul Manafort - lying to federal agents / financial crimes / FAR violation all from 2005. Currently Judge Ellis is reviewing the motion that the SC is acting outside of its jurisdiction. The SC got caught misleading the court by making claims that Rosenstein noted in a secret memo that expanded the SC jurisdiction to section B. When they were ordered to produce the unredacted memo they changed their story and said the authorization by Rosenstein was a verbal order.
* - Thirteen Russians and Three Russian entities - 2014 posed as US citizens to run political ads (BEFORE Trump was the nominee). Determined to havr no impact on the election or outcome and unrelated to Trump / Trump campaign.
* - Rick Gates - Lying to federal agents and conspiracy (financial crimes with Manafort from 2005).
* - George Papadopoulos - lying to federal agents

None of which have anything to do with Trump Russia collusion or any Trump involvement.

a reply to: Sillyolme

and yet reality says you are wrong. Feel free to read the facts in the post you are ignoring laying out all the IG investigations.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

Where's the beef honey?

Oh my i don't know whether to laugh or feel sorry for you.
The IG report is done. There is no more due on this.
Requests from trump sycophants in the house for further investigations doesn't mean they are going to do it. They can ask til the cows come home but it looks like trump doesn't own the IG. Or Jeff Sessions for that matter.

Give it up already, dont you get tired of defending this baloney?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Martin75

Strzok was entitled to his opinion of trump.
The report showed this did not effect his work or the investigation and in fact he and Page asked for even stricter actions in the investigation into the server.

And I got oceanfront property in Arizona great price.

Has the FBI been allowed to look at that server oh right they didn't need to. This is bull# and the country will not stand for it

originally posted by: MetalThunder
This investigation was only meant to affect the midterm elections, to turn public opinion about the direction the politics of Washington had taken in 2016.

The last grasp at retaining power back to the Party of no message, just "Get Trump"

Mueller dragging his feet coming to any conclusions, is meant to suggest that there is something to investigate. Suggestions are enough for those who lost.

All optics .... to satisfy the believers that the election was stolen .... A pacifier and final attempt to change the tide that is rolling thru Washington.

Mueller's conclusion will be disappointing, just like election night at the DNC.

What is important is to Vote this Fall ... Be Heard and make it count.

Oh it's going to affect the midterm elections all right just not the way they thought.

The people are pissed! And this just pissed him off more. Get ready for the pissed off American people. You pissed us off the first time we elected Trump. You pisses off this time.... Tick tock

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: GuidedKill

There is still lying to Congress as well as on 302 apps to clear

That's complete conspiracy theory you know.
And there is no other report due. This was it.
The IG is not investigating the Russia probe or Robert Mueller.

Bahahaha
Uninformed blowhard

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Too bad trump told Lester Holt, the Russian spies that he invited into the oval office and every American with a tv that he fired Comey because of the RUSHER THING.
It really doesn't matter what the IG reported because that's just a condemnation of James Comey but it does not address why he was fired at all. And we all know why he was fired because the president of the United States told us why he fired him.

please show where Trump didn't have the authority to fire Comey for ANY reason and you will have a valid point, if you can't, then you have no point, and honestly, no reason to have posted that other than to effectively tie a pork chop around you neck to get the dog to show you some attention.

a reply to: network dude

No my yob mon.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude

No my yob mon.

No reason was needed to fire Comey. Not sure why this is so hard for you to understand.

As for your job.. It is your job to support your posts with facts. Thus far you have never done this.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude

No my yob mon.

No reason was needed to fire Comey. Not sure why this is so hard for you to understand.

As for your job.. It is your job to support your posts with facts. Thus far you have never done this.

You're absolutely correct!! However this damning IG report only throws water all over any smoke Mueller thought he saw. With a job review that bad there is no doubt that Comey was unemployable. Even before Trump took office. It's a shame that Barack Obama employed and promoted such a scum bag. While shameful not surprising that Obama would employ such trash. Birds of a feather flock together and all. Fact is he did such a poor job over all Comey is lucky he was allowed to draw that check so long.

So buh bye obstruction....Piss poor job performance was the reason for firing, as evident by the IG report.

Now on to that collusion charge....what statute was that again???

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Too bad trump told Lester Holt, the Russian spies that he invited into the oval office and every American with a tv that he fired Comey because of the RUSHER THING.
It really doesn't matter what the IG reported because that's just a condemnation of James Comey but it does not address why he was fired at all. And we all know why he was fired because the president of the United States told us why he fired him.

please show where Trump didn't have the authority to fire Comey for ANY reason and you will have a valid point, if you can't, then you have no point, and honestly, no reason to have posted that other than to effectively tie a pork chop around you neck to get the dog to show you some attention.

She has a very valid point. Trump did not have to have a reason to fire Comey. That is correct. Even though he did not have to have a reason to fire Comey, the reason he did so is very important, as it is an indication of his intent.

Intent is important because if he did do so because of the Russia "thing", it could be reasonable grounds to bring up impeachment charges in congress. That precedent was set with Nixon, who did something very similar to what Trump is accused of doing. Specifically, section 4- Article 1 of his articles of impeachment.

interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees;

To argue that he had the authority to do what he did is a bit of a "pork chop" of it's own, to serve as a distraction from the real meat and potatoes of the issue. If it was simply a matter of him having the authority to do what he did, the SC would not be wanting to interview Trump about the issue. But they do. They themselves want to know his intent as to why he did what he did.

So I think your position is very disingenuous or ill-informed.

a reply to: introvert

So by the standards set by the Clinton email investigation all Trump has to do is say I fired him over job performance and had no intent....

Should be wrapped up by Monday then.....

Witch hunt bro....You're smart enough to see it....Just to bias to care

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Better to be pissed off than pissed on.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Better to be pissed off than pissed on.

Speaking from experience?

Ewwww