How does the IG report affect Mueller investgation?

a reply to: BlueAjah

What matters is the trump DOJ’s IG report just said “political bias played no direct role in the events behind the investigations”.

That no one acted criminally..

Aka the only political bias was Indirect and the perfectly legal kind.

So what??


You claiming some moral victory where the “left’s side was 100% validated but in a kinda shady way so it doesn’t count..”?


Lol how is that a victory..



Trump/gop is the one who set the bar high.. promising felonies had been committed and people were gonna pay... “lock her up” and all.

a reply to: BlueAjah

There's no more to come. This is it.

a reply to: BlueAjah

TRUMP SAID IT WAS BECAUSE OF RUSSIA ON TV!!

Lol

a reply to: JoshuaCox

I see that you did not read the whole report. The summary of conclusions is not supported by the facts in the rest of the report. It seems likely that the conclusion was influenced by people trying to white-wash the facts.

There were at least 5 people referred for further investigation, so do not assume there was no criminality.

a reply to: BlueAjah

It's over blue.

a reply to: Sillyolme

The IG report itself does not even say that this is it, so that is not an accurate assumption.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Strzok wasn't fired.
What else are you wrong about?

a reply to: BlueAjah

Stop already. Jesus Christ. It's over. No one is going after Clinton again.
This does not say they screwed up the investigation or that they made any mistskes.
It says that FBI agents are entitled to their political opinions like any American citizen. What it says is that those opinions did not effect the investigation.

a reply to: keenmachine

The dossier is real. Some things are not verified much is verified. Don't put words in my mouth then argue about it.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

Strzok wasn't fired.
What else are you wrong about?

He was fired from the Mueller investigation.
Obviously, that is what we were talking about.

a reply to: BlueAjah

I see you don't understand that this is over.
Your personal interpretation of it doesn't matter because they already reviewed the results in a statement on tv and the bottom line is Comey was wrong in his handling of the case especially his public condemnation while exonerating her. And that the declination to bring charges was the correct one to make.
Period. Nothing more.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Period. Nothing more.

Until election cycle kicks up again.

a reply to: BlueAjah

It doesn't say there's more to come so that is an inaccurate assumption.

This was it.
The IG wasn't investigating the Russia probe or Robert Mueller.

a reply to: BlueAjah

He was removed from one investigation within the bureau and moved to another position.
If you change departments within the same company you have not been fired from one and hired by the other.
Just give it up already.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

I see you don't understand that this is over.
Your personal interpretation of it doesn't matter because they already reviewed the results in a statement on tv and the bottom line is Comey was wrong in his handling of the case especially his public condemnation while exonerating her. And that the declination to bring charges was the correct one to make.
Period. Nothing more.

At a minimum, we found that the employees’ use of FBI systems and devices to send the identified messages demonstrated extremely poor judgment and a gross lack of professionalism. We therefore refer this information to the FBI for its handling and consideration of whether the messages sent by the five employees listed above violated the FBI’s Offense Code of Conduct.

We identified numerous instances in which Comey used a personal email account to conduct unclassified FBI business. We found that, given the absence of exigent circumstances and the frequency with which the use of personal email occurred, Comey’s use of a personal email account for unclassified FBI business to be inconsistent with Department policy.

We found that Strzok used his personal email accounts for official government business on several occasions, including forwarding an email from his FBI account to his personal email account about the proposed search warrant the Midyear team was seeking on the Weiner laptop. This email included a draft of the search warrant affidavit, which contained information from the Weiner investigation that appears to have been under seal at the time in the Southern District of New York and information obtained pursuant to a grand jury subpoena issued in the Eastern District of Virginia in the Midyear investigation. We refer to the FBI the issue of whether Strzok’s use of personal email accounts violated FBI and Department policies.

We identified numerous FBI employees, at all levels of the organization and with no official reason to be in contact with the media, who were nevertheless in frequent contact with reporters. Attached to this report as Attachments E and F are two link charts that reflect the volume of communications that we identified between FBI employees and media representatives in April/May and October 2016. We have profound concerns about the volume and extent of unauthorized media contacts by FBI personnel that we have uncovered during our review.

In addition, we identified instances where FBI employees improperly received benefits from reporters, including tickets to sporting events, golfing outings, drinks and meals, and admittance to nonpublic social events. We will separately report on those investigations as they are concluded, consistent with the Inspector General Act, other applicable federal statutes, and OIG policy.

Page 13

I'll give you this Blue... He probably will get fired now.

a reply to: BlueAjah

It's over blue.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

It's over blue.

I disagree, I think it's just starting.

The more dirt the dems bring up the more it backfires on them.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

There's no more to come. This is it.

You wish