It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

OIG Report Released: Full text

page: 8
32
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Do you think the investigation was complete back then, which was before all info was gathered?




posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

That's not from the report.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: EnoandToyvo

Someone forgot to wind it up.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:16 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: proximo

Imagine that. Eleven investigations with the same results.
She hasn't broken the law. I'm not okay with people breaking the law and you are talking out your @$$ saying I am.
How about you accept the results that keep repeating themselves.
You can't.
Says a lot about your character if you ask me.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:19 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I haven't read anything that would suggest the fbi tried to help trump.


I don't feel like the fbi hurt hillary ether.

I solely blame comey for that.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: proximo

My bias? Not yours though?
What a joke.
Shoo you child.
Go tell your mother she wants you.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Keep reading ... you'll find the following on page 424



Although we found no documentary or testimonial evidence directly connecting the political views these employees expressed in their text messages and instant messages to the specific Midyear investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, the messages cast a cloud over the FBI investigations to which these employees were assigned. Ultimately, the consequences of these actions impact not only the senders of these messages but also others who worked on these investigations and, indeed, the entire FBI.

We therefore refer this information to the FBI for its handling and consideration of whether the messages sent by the five employees listed above violates the FBI’s Offense Code of Conduct.


I'm sure you'll get there in a while ...



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: burntheships

Those crackers are from opinion pieces ... not the IG report.

You know, the document I'm quoting from?


Apparently you are not looking close enough.

The IG report specifically said that Agent Strzok texts
revealed a bias that may have led to the FBI not investigating
Huma Abedin's laptop.

Even Strzok's attorney is all over that one.



Special Agent Strzok’s political ‘bias’ may have been a cause of the FBI’s failure, between September 29 and October 25, 2016, to seek a second search warrant


thehill.com...
edit on 14-6-2018 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Zelun

This report is damning to the FBI and DOJ. Comey, Page, Strzok and a few others are taken to task. It confirms everything we have been complaining about since before the SC even started.

5 people have already been referred for continued investigation in relation to this report.

For those who are not aware a few things -
The OIG report is not a criminal investigation. They only investigate policy and ethics violations.
Huber, the DOJ prosecutor assigned to Horowitz by AG Sessions has a grand jury empaneled and has for almost a year now. Several referrals have been made to him by the OIG.
This report only deals with the China email and the DOJ/FBI handling of that situation.
This report is one of several that are currently in the pipeline.

IG refers five FBI employees for investigation, as more anti-Trump messages revealed
edit on 14-6-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:31 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Your quotes that you asked me to comment on are NOT from the IG report ... they are commentary ON the IG report.

You still aren't quoting from the report. Everyone knows why.

Because the IG report states clearly and repeatedly that there is no evidence that any investigation that Strzok was involved in was compromised in any way.

Yeah, he needs to be disciplined. It's stupid to use work phones for personal texts.

The topic here is the OIG report; that's what I'm quoting from ... why are you dredging up opinion articles???

Hmmmm?



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

But it did not effect the investigation or the performance of the agents.
Strzok will likely be demoted or maybe, based on Chris Wrays announcement earlier this evening, he could be fired.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: burntheships The topic here is the OIG report; that's what I'm quoting from ... why are you dredging up opinion articles???

Hmmmm?


Your intentionally ignoring the quotes from the IG Report.

WHY?



Special Agent Strzok’s political ‘bias’ may have been a cause of the FBI’s failure, between September 29 and October 25, 2016, to seek a second search warrant for the Anthony Weiner laptop,” Strzok's attorney, Aitan Goelman, said in a statement.


thehill.com...

Can you read?

Strzok's attorney is freaking out about the IG REPORT.

WHY?

Because Strzok is likely going to be prosecuted for Obstruction,
and more.

READ



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burntheships

That's not from the report.


Yes it is dear.

READ it.

Your intentionally ignoring all parts that do not fit your agenda.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:39 PM
link   
a reply to: japhrimu

Before all info was gathered?

I don't know what you mean.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

If it's from the IG report why are you sourcing The Hill?

Because you're citing COMMENTARY ... Do you genuinely not know the difference?

I'd love to see any proof you have for Obstruction ... Got any?



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:43 PM
link   
The funny part of this report is the response by Democrats. Apparently it now is not the Russians who helped Trump win but James Comey who helped Trump win thru a massive error in judgment.

That might be enough to get the DOJ to prosecute Comey since there seems to be bipartisan dislike of Comey.

Comey does need to be impeached to prevent him from holding a federal job again and his law license needs to be revoked.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Yeah he's walking thin ice. HERE's just one thing the report says although CNN isn't reporting so...silly stuff gets said.




posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: burntheships

If it's from the IG report why are you sourcing The Hill?

Because you're citing COMMENTARY ... Do you genuinely not know the difference?

I'd love to see any proof you have for Obstruction ... Got any?


The Hill article in question is specifically citing from the OIG report.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 06:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

But it did not effect the investigation or the performance of the agents.
Strzok will likely be demoted or maybe, based on Chris Wrays announcement earlier this evening, he could be fired.


5 FBI agents have been referred by the OIG for internal review for potentially violating FBI policies with those text messages.

Strzok wont be the only person disciplined for this.

This OIG report bolsters Manaforts claims as well so I expect it to come up with Judge Ellis.




top topics



 
32
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join