It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: face23785
I actually agree that Clinton clearly mishandled classified information, that she knew that at least some of the communications constituted mishandling of classified information and of course, that she lied about it.
We also know now that Powell did similar. I wonder what's going on with the new administration? Donald Trump is using an insecure personal phone. Kushner and others are known to use encrypted apps which could violate record keeping regs. It's strongly suspected that John Kelly's phone was hacked and there was a DHS report last year that found evidence of IMSI catchers in multiple DC locations, including near the White House.
originally posted by: proximo
The most interesting thing about this report so far to me is that a bunch of these FBI agents investigating Clinton were also using private email accounts for work activities such as Strzok, Page and Comey.
This tells me the real reason they did not go after Hillary is they were covering their own asses for breaking the law - not that they did not know she broke it.
That is corruption plain and simple - and this clearly shows why we cant have the DOJ investigating itself.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Zelun
This pretty much I just predicted so far from what's now being reported and what I'm reading. Certain texts gave an appearance of bias but exhaustive examination of the actual investigation didn't turn up any impropriety.
There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual.
Nonetheless, these messages cast a cloud over the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation and the investigation’s credibility. But our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable. The broader impact of these text and instant messages, including on such matters as the public perception of the FBI and the Midyear investigation, are discussed in Chapter Twelve of our report.
The part about not having any evidence of political bias is specifically talking about Comey, hence the reference to Chapter 5, which is all about Comey. It later goes on to state there was political bias at least from Strzok, who was one of the lead investigators. That's huge.
In assessing the decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop, we were particularly concerned about text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions they made were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, and the implication in some of these text messages, particularly Strzok’s August 8 text message (“we’ll stop” candidate Trump from being elected), was that Strzok might be willing to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. Under these circumstances, we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: theantediluvian
Wow you're good. You should have an 800 number. LOL.
Do readings.
Strzok & Page will get dinged again for their texts with something about an appearance of bias. There's supposedly a couple previously unseen texts that will be suggestive but there will be no direct proof of impropriety. The pro-Trump crowd will seize on these texts and renew demands for a second SC.
“[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page texted Strzok.
“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded.
The Justice Department inspector general on Thursday castigated former FBI Director James B. Comey for his actions during the Hillary Clinton email investigation and found that other senior bureau officials showed a “willingness to take official action” to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president.
Page writes that she was preparing the talking points because "potus wants to know everything we’re doing."
Critical to their conclusion was that the emails in question lacked proper classification markings,
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: face23785
I actually agree that Clinton clearly mishandled classified information, that she knew that at least some of the communications constituted mishandling of classified information and of course, that she lied about it.
We also know now that Powell did similar. I wonder what's going on with the new administration? Donald Trump is using an insecure personal phone. Kushner and others are known to use encrypted apps which could violate record keeping regs. It's strongly suspected that John Kelly's phone was hacked and there was a DHS report last year that found evidence of IMSI catchers in multiple DC locations, including near the White House.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Hmmmm ... haven't read every post to this point, but let me guess:
IG Horowitz is now officially "Deep State."
Sessions is suspect probably also "Deep State."
We should condemn the entire FBI because of two texts by two people even though this extensive investigation shows those two people did nothing incorrect in their work ... Comey and Lynch might have made better decisions about their comportment ... but there is no evidence of wrong-doing?
How am I doin'? LOL.
The Justice Department inspector general on Thursday castigated former FBI Director James B. Comey for his actions during the Hillary Clinton email investigation and found that other senior bureau officials showed a “willingness to take official action” to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785
The collusion part is not dead.
Sorry you've been misinformed.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Hmmmm ... haven't read every post to this point, but let me guess:
IG Horowitz is now officially "Deep State."
Sessions is suspect probably also "Deep State."
We should condemn the entire FBI because of two texts by two people even though this extensive investigation shows those two people did nothing incorrect in their work ... Comey and Lynch might have made better decisions about their comportment ... but there is no evidence of wrong-doing?
How am I doin'? LOL.
originally posted by: Zelun
a reply to: face23785
Yeah, I wondered about this too. My understand from the service and holding a clearance was that the nature of the information is what determines how it is classified, not the markings. So disseminating classified materials over non-secure channels is bad, and so is doing it without the proper markings. So wouldn't that make both at the same time a double-whammy?
Critical to their conclusion was that the emails in question lacked proper classification markings,
page vi
Am I reading this wrong?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: face23785
Nah. I'm not DNC ... I'm Deep State, LOL. Or is it the Gnomes of Zurich? Muahahah.
I've made my way through the thread now, and as I anticipated, since there's no findings of wrongdoing much less criminal action on the part of anyone at the FBI, some of you have already started throwing Horowitz and Sessions under the Trump Short Bus.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: face23785
Thanks for the confirmation that I was correct!
Seriously though, aren't you happy that the IG found no wrongdoing or criminal activity on the part of the FBI?
Sadly, this undermines all the hard work that so many in the MSM and their allies have done to try to discredit the FBI's investigation of Russian interference in our elections.
"Just the facts, ma'am."
LOL
particularly a text message from Strzok on August 8 stating “No. No he’s not.We’ll stop it.” in response to a Page text “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!,” are not only indicative of a biased state of mind but imply a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.
We further found evidence that in some instances Strzok and Page advocated for more aggressive investigative measures in the Midyear investigation
For example, seven email chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending emails about those matters and receiving emails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.