It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'm committed to the truth.
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Gryphon66
Again, you are incorrect.
I must admit you are trying hard to paint a broad brush about the honesty of the FBI based of a very specific part of the report, but you will be called out for the error (or lie).
The report made it clear that there was bias within the FBI against the now President AND it affected their decision making.
That's just a fact.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Gryphon66
Again, you are incorrect.
I must admit you are trying hard to paint a broad brush about the honesty of the FBI based of a very specific part of the report, but you will be called out for the error (or lie).
The report made it clear that there was bias within the FBI against the now President AND it affected their decision making.
That's just a fact.
Yes, the report made it clear that Strzok and Page expressed bias against Trump and for Clinton in their communications.
It also makes clear that those opinions didn't affect the investigations they were working on.
Are you truly ignorant of the fact that the FBI then and now is mostly comprised of Republicans and Trump supporters?
I've posted evidence of this previously ... if you're nice, I might post it again for you, since you seem uninformed on the issues.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth
The report wasn't about trump. Why would they mention that?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Gryphon66
Please detail a few successes in domestic terrorism. What i recall are a series of entrapment schemes where they find mentally challenged muslim boys to execute an fbi concocted terror plot.
That and burning women and children alive.
Meanwhile their negligence with 911 was so bad it almost looks like complicity.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth
The report wasn't about trump. Why would they mention that?
Why they mentioned it is less important than the fact that they did.
If you would really like to know why, it is detailed in the report. Perhaps you should actually read it.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Gryphon66
Im just refuting you claim that they were a cornerstone.