It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

OIG Report Released: Full text

page: 10
32
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

No direct evidence. There is a difference.

Also why are you ignoring the facts?


The report stated that investigators "did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected [the Clinton email investigation]," but added that “we were concerned about text messages exchanged by FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, Special Counsel to the Deputy Director, that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations.”




posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: Gryphon66

Dude, you got called out, everybody sees it. Take your licks and begone.


Nah. I think I'll stay and keep pointing out the ridiculous spin and lies.

I posted the quotes; thats what can be seen.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I am not ignoring the facts.

You are desperately trying to obfuscate.

You keep posting a quote that you originally directed to another member. And the quote is from The Hill making commentary about the IG report. Yes, parts of the IG report are quoted.

That's your quote, not the quote from burntheships, which I haven't addressed with you.

Are you confused about what you're arguing about???

The IG report states, clearly and repeatedly, that no investigation was compromised. Is that true or not?
edit on 14-6-2018 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Gryphon66

The OIG doesnt not answer to the FBI or DOJ. Any criminal referral goes to Huber, the DOJ prosecutor from Utah. Policy violations go to the FBI since its a policy review of the agents actions. Any improper action by DOJ prosecutors that possibly violated policy goes to the DOJ for a policy review.

You up to speed now or do we need to explain it to you in another way for you to understand it?


I've been up to speed. You keep answering questions that no one's asking.

Did Director Wray address any referrals for indictments?

Has anyone addressed referrals for indictments? If so, who?



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:52 PM
link   
Starting on page 76 of the actual report, there is some really interesting information about FBI screw-ups in the actual investigation of Clinton's emails.

There is too much to even summarize here. They could not location many devices that reportedly had emails stored on them. They had other devices in their possession, but could not search them because Clinton did not give them permission to search. They neglected to get search warrants for these and other devices.

It seems like Clinton and her people were much more "careless" with emails than just storing them on one server. They had copies of emails all over the place on several servers, at least 13 mobile devices, multiple laptops, and even thumb drives.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:55 PM
link   
TL;DR:

No one will be charged.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Too much to summarize, eh?

You'll find this on page vi:




As described in Chapter Seven of our report, the prosecutors concluded that the evidence did not support prosecution under any of these statutes for various reasons, including that former Secretary Clinton and her senior aides lacked the intent to communicate classified information on unclassified systems. Critical to their conclusion was that the emails in question lacked proper classification markings, that the senders often refrained from using specific classified facts or terms in emails and worded emails carefully in an attempt to “talk around” classified information, that the emails were sent to other government officials in furtherance of their official duties, and that former Secretary Clinton relied on the judgment of State Department employees to properly handle classified information, among other facts.

We further found that the statute that required the most complex analysis by the prosecutors was Section 793(f)(1), the “gross negligence” provision that has been the focus of much of the criticism of the declination decision. As we describe in Chapters Two and Seven of our report, the prosecutors analyzed the legislative history of Section 793(f)(1), relevant case law, and the Department’s prior interpretation of the statute. They concluded that Section 793(f)(1) likely required a state of mind that was “so gross as to almost suggest deliberate intention,” criminally reckless, or “something that falls just short of being willful,” as well as evidence that the individuals who sent emails containing classified information “knowingly” included or transferred such information onto unclassified systems.

The Midyear team concluded that such proof was lacking. We found that this interpretation of Section 793(f)(1) was consistent with the Department’s historical approach in prior cases under different leadership, including in the 2008 decision not to prosecute former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales for mishandling classified documents.


Pretty clear eh? And in only three paragraphs.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Multiple servers and devices confirmed.

The classified stuff was flying all over the place !!

😃



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:57 PM
link   
Furthermore:




pg vii

We analyzed the Department’s declination decision according to the same analytical standard that we applied to other decisions made during the investigation. We did not substitute the OIG’s judgment for the judgments made by the Department, but rather sought to determine whether the decision was based on improper considerations, including political bias. We found no evidence that the conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of the facts, the law, and past Department practice. We therefore concluded that these were legal and policy judgments involving core prosecutorial discretion that were for the Department to make.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:58 PM
link   
This part is interesting:

He further told us that it was
“completely logical” that Clinton’s attorneys would not consent to the FBI’s review
of the laptops given that the laptops contained privileged information related to the
attorneys’ representation of other clients. FBI Attorney 1 told us that she believed,
based on the representations of Clinton’s counsel, that the six laptops never
contained the full 62,320 emails and that they only contained copies of the 30,490
emails that had been produced to the State Department. She stated that, as a
result, she did not believe that it was necessary to review the six laptops, especially
given the privilege concerns.


Page 113 of the pdf.

1. Why do Clinton's attorneys get to refuse access to privileged material, but Cohen had no choice? Just another example of the double standard.

2. They even admit that the laptops that were not searched contained copies of emails. That should have made them automatically part of the investigation and subject to search. Yet, the FBI just took their word for it that there was nothing to see there.


edit on 6/14/18 by BlueAjah because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Interestingly, their conclusions are not coinciding with the facts of the report. It's starting to look like Comey's form of drawing conclusions.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BlueAjah

Multiple servers and devices confirmed.

The classified stuff was flying all over the place !!

😃


So are [187]'s. RIP Seth Rich.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

LOL.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah


All the Clinton vs Trump double-standards need to be itemized. The number must be close to 100 by now!



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Did you read the full report, or just their conclusion?
The actual report hits the FBI hard for how they handled the investigation.
I am guessing that someone else put pressure on them to "handle" the conclusions, assuming that most people would only read that part.




edit on 6/14/18 by BlueAjah because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:04 PM
link   
Just heard that the Inspector General declared that Hillary Clinton "ABUSED CHILDREN". Is that true? If so, pizzagate is real after all.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

You don’t know what I mean?
I don’t know what you mean.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Just heard that the Inspector General declared that Hillary Clinton "ABUSED CHILDREN". Is that true? If so, pizzagate is real after all.


Got a quote? (He asks foolishly).



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Just heard that the Inspector General declared that Hillary Clinton "ABUSED CHILDREN". Is that true? If so, pizzagate is real after all.


a reply to: Gryphon66




Thomas Paine
‏ @Thomas1774Paine
46m46 minutes ago

BREAKING: IG Report Confirms True Pundit BOMBSHELL on Hillary’s Emails; Details Comey Was Briefed on Clinton-Linked ‘Sex Crimes Against Children’ Evidence on Weiner Laptop


IG Report Confirms True Pundit BOMBSHELL on Hillary’s Emails; Details Comey Was Briefed on Clinton-Linked ‘Sex Crimes Against Children’ Evidence on Weiner Laptop

Keep in mind True Pundit broke this story on November 2, 2016. (That’s 21 months ago for those keeping score).

Now, today, the Inspector General confirmed the FBI knew there was evidence on Anthony Weiner’s laptop and Hillary Clinton’s emails linked to sex crimes against children.

And James Comey was briefed about it.

From our 2016 news breaking article:

New York Police Department detectives and prosecutors working an alleged underage sexting case against former Congressman Anthony Weiner have turned over a newly-found laptop he shared with wife Huma Abedin to the FBI with enough evidence “to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life,” NYPD sources told True Pundit.

The NYPD seized the computer from Weiner during a search warrant and detectives discovered a trove of over 500,000 emails to and from Hillary Clinton, Abedin and other insiders during her tenure as secretary of state. The content of those emails sparked the FBI to reopen its defunct email investigation into Clinton on Friday.

But new revelations on the contents of that laptop, according to law enforcement sources, implicate the Democratic presidential candidate, her subordinates, and even select elected officials in far more alleged serious crimes than mishandling classified and top secret emails, sources said. NYPD sources said these new emails include evidence linking Clinton herself and associates to:

Money laundering
Child exploitation
Sex crimes with minors (children)
Perjury
Pay to play through Clinton Foundation
Obstruction of justice
Other felony crimes

Now, today, sex crimes with minors is mentioned several times in the 500-page IG report.

Here is the first, where a FBI investigator testifies he debriefed Comey on the materials after being notified of the sex-crimes-linked intelligence from the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division. Page 294:

Under the heading — “Hillary Clinton & Foundation Crime Against Children:”


click link for article...
edit on 14-6-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

True Pundit?

An article from 2016 from same is their source?

LOL



new topics

top topics



 
32
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join