It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dragonridr
Wrong the report actually says it cant prove his bias affected the investigation.
originally posted by: dragonridr
So accordong to the IG report Hillary investigation was just severly mis managed.
originally posted by: dragonridr
I disagree as the damage done to Hillary's campaign was significant.
originally posted by: dragonridr
Now for Trump he had a major win as well this IG report set up the next one coming out on the Russian investigation.
originally posted by: dragonridr
Strzok was behinf the scenes trying to get Trump and pushed thr investigation. I found this part of the report interesting.
"As we describe in this chapter, we found that Strzok was not the sole decision-maker for any of the specific investigative decisions examined in this chapter," the report said. "We further found evidence that in some instances Strzok and Page advocated for more aggressive investigative measures than did others on the Midyear team, such as the use of grand jury subpoenas and search warrants to obtain evidence."
Guess we know why they raided Cohens office dont we.
Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein adamantly defended the character and impartiality of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, as he came head-to-head on Wednesday with an increasingly aggressive campaign by Republicans to discredit the inquiry.
The Republicans’ effort received a fresh jolt from the release one night earlier of text messages exchanged last year between an F.B.I. agent, Peter Strzok, and an F.B.I. lawyer, Lisa Page, describing the possibility of an election victory by President Trump as “terrifying” and saying that Hillary Clinton “just has to win.” Mr. Mueller removed Mr. Strzok from the Russia investigation as soon as he learned of the texts, a step that Mr. Rosenstein praised. Nonetheless, Republicans used the messages as fodder to attack the impartiality of Mr. Mueller during an appearance by Mr. Rosenstein before the House Judiciary Committee.
“The public trust in this whole thing is gone,” said Representative Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio, summing up sentiments among his party. “It seems to me there are two things you can do: You can disband the Mueller special prosecutor, and you can do what we’ve all called for and appoint a second special counsel to look into this.” But the swelling campaign to undermine Mr. Mueller’s investigation, which has dominated conservative media for days, appeared to have little effect on Mr. Rosenstein, who oversees Mr. Mueller. Mr. Rosenstein said he would only fire Mr. Mueller if he had cause under Justice Department regulations — and he said nothing that has happened so far met that standard.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: Stevenjames15
What crimes has President Trump committed?
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: Stevenjames15
What crimes has President Trump committed?
originally posted by: wantsome
Trumpism can't be stopped just like the Nazi's. It's only takes the ideology of a few to screw up everything for everyone. Nothing like cherry picking parts out of the report to suit your agenda even if it was taken out of context right?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: carewemust
Why don't you quote that?
Betcha can't.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
It says there was no evidence of any investigation being affected by Strzok's bias.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: mkultra11
I'm not sure who you're talking about, but I've been QUOTING from the actual report. The mindless tactics of "you can't/didn't/won't read" repeated over and over and over aren't going to fool anyone.
A member made an absurd claim that Pelosi has said that the President committed a crime by working with Congress on a bill. Now, perhaps those who are only interested in hearing wild beliefs repeated accept that without question, but most of us here want facts.
Surely, you're interested in facts, ... right?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
It says there was no evidence of any investigation being affected by Strzok's bias.
False.
The IG report made that finding for a single investigation, more specifically, six elements of a single investigation that they referenced clearly in the report.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
It says there was no evidence of any investigation being affected by Strzok's bias.
False.
The IG report made that finding for a single investigation, more specifically, six elements of a single investigation that they referenced clearly in the report.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Gryphon66
If this report did not reveal issues with the FBI, then why would the IG have made recommendations for further investigations? And why would the FBI now be saying that they are going to retrain all agents in certain matters?
If the report said they did fine, this would not be happening.
I don't have the slightest clue of what you are talking about. I've heard of hashtags but I don't follow social media. ATS is the extent of what I know about it. I don't have a facebook twitter or any of that. I stay off social media because it's full of idiots narcissism and trolls. I joined Facebook and it lasted a month before I shut my account down and left. That was 5 years ago.
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: wantsome
Trumpism can't be stopped just like the Nazi's. It's only takes the ideology of a few to screw up everything for everyone. Nothing like cherry picking parts out of the report to suit your agenda even if it was taken out of context right?
And there's nothing dogmatic about #Resist, #NeverTrump, or simply biting ones own nose to spite Trump's face?