It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: GuidedKill
Yes but do they all lie about it to the FBI?? And when they do are they all free from prosecution? Or is that just the left that gets a pass??
just who in hell is in charge?
trump and sessions
they got us going on about this and that and they do not give a crap
show's over folks
Trump was not president when Hillary was protected...Obama was....
that is foolish
500+days or leeding you on
lock her up shhhhhhhhh not really that is not on anyones shoulders other than the two peeps running the show now
your back and forth blame shifting only fuels the extenuated injustice
keep on dividing they got you hooked
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Xtrozero
So a private server with classified material is OK then?
You know it wasn't the private server that initially got Hillary in trouble. It was her refusal to copy everything from her private server to the national archives. If she had done that, her private server would be a non issue.
And that was because Guccifer published some of her emails he got from Sid Blumenthal.
🎁
There all in it together and now the show is losing it's main plot...
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Xtrozero
So a private server with classified material is OK then?
You know it wasn't the private server that initially got Hillary in trouble. It was her refusal to copy everything from her private server to the national archives. If she had done that, her private server would be a non issue.
And that was because Guccifer published some of her emails he got from Sid Blumenthal.
🎁
That is not why Hillary refused to copy her emails to the National Archive.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: GuidedKill
Exactly. If Obama had not failed to appoint a permanent IG for Hillary's State Department, this abuse and illegality would have been found out. He was complicit. There was a reason.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Xtrozero
So a private server with classified material is OK then?
You know it wasn't the private server that initially got Hillary in trouble. It was her refusal to copy everything from her private server to the national archives. If she had done that, her private server would be a non issue.
And that was because Guccifer published some of her emails he got from Sid Blumenthal.
That is not why Hillary refused to copy her emails to the National Archive.
4) The statement that "we assess it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton's private email account" is too strong. It is more accurate to say we know foreign actors obtained access to some of her emails (including at least one Secret one) via compromises of the private email accounts of some of her staffers.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Xtrozero
So a private server with classified material is OK then?
You know it wasn't the private server that initially got Hillary in trouble. It was her refusal to copy everything from her private server to the national archives. If she had done that, her private server would be a non issue.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: GuidedKill
Yes but do they all lie about it to the FBI?? And when they do are they all free from prosecution? Or is that just the left that gets a pass??
just who in hell is in charge?
trump and sessions
they got us going on about this and that and they do not give a crap
show's over folks
Trump was not president when Hillary was protected...Obama was....
that is foolish
500+days or leeding you on
lock her up shhhhhhhhh not really that is not on anyones shoulders other than the two peeps running the show now
your back and forth blame shifting only fuels the extenuated injustice
keep on dividing they got you hooked
Leading us on hey? Have you even thought for once this is the WAY better punishment? Say he arrests her, everyone says it's out of spite and it automatically gives her the victim card she loves to play so well....No thanks!
On the other hand....Let the IG report come out, let all the people who covered for her get in trouble, let it be a slow death by a thousand little leaky cuts. Let everyone see the corruption she attempted to employ to steal the elections like she stole the nomination from Bernie...Let it all come out super slow and super painful....And let it build to 2018 showing how corrupt their party is....Let Hillary and Obama's crimes stay in the media until 2020..
It's 4 D bro.....
“In the process of responding to congressional document requests pertaining to Benghazi, State Department officials recognized that it had access to relatively few email records from former Secretary Clinton,” State Department spokesman John Kirby told the Post in a statement. “State Department officials contacted her representatives during the summer of 2014 to learn more about her email use and the status of emails in that account.”
www.factcheck.org...
...The occasional use of a personal email account is permitted in certain circumstances, such as emergencies. As we wrote, the IG report said it found “many examples of staff using personal email accounts to conduct official business.” But, as we also wrote, the National Archives and Records Administration requires all work-related emails to be properly preserved. Federal rules required Clinton to preserve work emails and turn them over before leaving office, but she did not turn over her emails until 21 months after she left office.
Oh don't get me wrong, all of this is suspicious. If other gov employees or contractors are held legally responsible for such behavior or carelessness, so should she.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Actually terms like "state actors" are a thing, and it basically means entities, not theatre or film..
originally posted by: testingtesting
I reckon It was Gerard Depardieu and Fassbender.
Calling them actors suggests people masquerading as other folk. Did you have actual spies or leakers involved or was it just hackers?.
And it usually refers to our enemies....
Isn't it a great feeling knowing a woman like her so reckless with state secrets will NEVER be President?? Gives me a warm feeling knowing she will never be able to wield the power she is willing to kill for.
Makes me smile inside and out!
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Nobody is safe from hackers.
So a private server with classified material is OK then? If she was in the military and a lowly E3 rank and did that with any classified she would have been prosecuted. The part that bothers me is we hold someone fresh out of high school to a higher legal standards than Hillary.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Nobody is safe from hackers.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
I just don't find it stunning or shocking that Hillary's server was hacked. It's ironic though, since they (the Clintons) thought they could do cyber security better than the government they served.