It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: matafuchs
Build a wall and case closed....
what about asylum seekers?
they are being turned away at the ports.
a wall does not control the smuggling problem we deal with at the ports
the national guard was enacted to act as temporary wall yet the smuggling continues
There must be a cap on asylum seekers too. Asylum seeking cannot and should not ever mean an open border gateway. Changing the words from illegal immigrant to asylum seeker, doesn't mean you get your open borders wish granted.
Laws can be changed so asylum can be sought at embassies outside the U.S. We should not entice children being sent across a desert where they are raped and killed.
yes states can set there limits
the feds can only legally make recommendations
no it would not be wise to allow people to apply outside the usa
the system would literly implode under the pressure of the whole world applying at the same time.
the thought behind making them come here to apply is that the harder you make it the less applications we would get and those that made it here would be the stronger among them
sad but true
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: matafuchs
Build a wall and case closed....
what about asylum seekers?
they are being turned away at the ports.
a wall does not control the smuggling problem we deal with at the ports
the national guard was enacted to act as temporary wall yet the smuggling continues
There must be a cap on asylum seekers too. Asylum seeking cannot and should not ever mean an open border gateway. Changing the words from illegal immigrant to asylum seeker, doesn't mean you get your open borders wish granted.
Laws can be changed so asylum can be sought at embassies outside the U.S. We should not entice children being sent across a desert where they are raped and killed.
yes states can set there limits
the feds can only legally make recommendations
no it would not be wise to allow people to apply outside the usa
the system would literly implode under the pressure of the whole world applying at the same time.
the thought behind making them come here to apply is that the harder you make it the less applications we would get and those that made it here would be the stronger among them
sad but true
Easy peasy, we have limited intake, apply IQ, Education, etc, merit tests. Take the best of the best seeking Asylum from all over the world.
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: matafuchs
Build a wall and case closed....
what about asylum seekers?
they are being turned away at the ports.
a wall does not control the smuggling problem we deal with at the ports
the national guard was enacted to act as temporary wall yet the smuggling continues
There must be a cap on asylum seekers too. Asylum seeking cannot and should not ever mean an open border gateway. Changing the words from illegal immigrant to asylum seeker, doesn't mean you get your open borders wish granted.
Laws can be changed so asylum can be sought at embassies outside the U.S. We should not entice children being sent across a desert where they are raped and killed.
yes states can set there limits
the feds can only legally make recommendations
no it would not be wise to allow people to apply outside the usa
the system would literly implode under the pressure of the whole world applying at the same time.
the thought behind making them come here to apply is that the harder you make it the less applications we would get and those that made it here would be the stronger among them
sad but true
Easy peasy, we have limited intake, apply IQ, Education, etc, merit tests. Take the best of the best seeking Asylum from all over the world.
I agree somewhat
now understand that asylum is only a small portion of the total intake and it is not really an area where allowing the best is the wisest choice since the goal of asylum is to provide a safe haven for those in the world that have been beaten and battered by life the most. Those that if not allowed to enter would wither away and die.
The rest of the intake certainly needs to be exactly as you stated.
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: Xenogears
originally posted by: howtonhawky
originally posted by: matafuchs
Build a wall and case closed....
what about asylum seekers?
they are being turned away at the ports.
a wall does not control the smuggling problem we deal with at the ports
the national guard was enacted to act as temporary wall yet the smuggling continues
There must be a cap on asylum seekers too. Asylum seeking cannot and should not ever mean an open border gateway. Changing the words from illegal immigrant to asylum seeker, doesn't mean you get your open borders wish granted.
Laws can be changed so asylum can be sought at embassies outside the U.S. We should not entice children being sent across a desert where they are raped and killed.
yes states can set there limits
the feds can only legally make recommendations
no it would not be wise to allow people to apply outside the usa
the system would literly implode under the pressure of the whole world applying at the same time.
the thought behind making them come here to apply is that the harder you make it the less applications we would get and those that made it here would be the stronger among them
sad but true
Easy peasy, we have limited intake, apply IQ, Education, etc, merit tests. Take the best of the best seeking Asylum from all over the world.
I agree somewhat
now understand that asylum is only a small portion of the total intake and it is not really an area where allowing the best is the wisest choice since the goal of asylum is to provide a safe haven for those in the world that have been beaten and battered by life the most. Those that if not allowed to enter would wither away and die.
The rest of the intake certainly needs to be exactly as you stated.
If illegal migrants inundate the asylum seeking system, and we can only let in a certain amount, we must choose measures that ensure the best for our country.